Gaza construction convoy crosses from Egypt

It is not a siege on food. It is a siege on freedom.

The food thing is a straw man.


oh gee---tinnie is making a tentative leap
into a tiny modicum of truth----good tinnie.
What "FREEDOMS" are abridged to the
Gazans in response following their defeat
in the arabist/islamicist aggression of 1967
and their incessant BOMB ON STINKING
ass activities?

For the record---I agree--there is a robust
effort on the part of Israel to avoid the
bomb on stinking ass activities AND
the launching of baby brain smashing
nail bombs which are lethal to baby
brains but are declared "harmless'"
by nazis ---these restrictions do annoy
you and your fellows
 
It is not a siege on food. It is a siege on freedom.

The food thing is a straw man.


oh gee---tinnie is making a tentative leap
into a tiny modicum of truth----good tinnie.
What "FREEDOMS" are abridged to the
Gazans in response following their defeat
in the arabist/islamicist aggression of 1967
and their incessant BOMB ON STINKING
ass activities?

For the record---I agree--there is a robust
effort on the part of Israel to avoid the
bomb on stinking ass activities AND
the launching of baby brain smashing
nail bombs which are lethal to baby
brains but are declared "harmless'"
by nazis ---these restrictions do annoy
you and your fellows

Is there there a point in all this blabber someplace?
 
It is not a siege on food. It is a siege on freedom.

The food thing is a straw man.


oh gee---tinnie is making a tentative leap
into a tiny modicum of truth----good tinnie.
What "FREEDOMS" are abridged to the
Gazans in response following their defeat
in the arabist/islamicist aggression of 1967
and their incessant BOMB ON STINKING
ass activities?

For the record---I agree--there is a robust
effort on the part of Israel to avoid the
bomb on stinking ass activities AND
the launching of baby brain smashing
nail bombs which are lethal to baby
brains but are declared "harmless'"
by nazis ---these restrictions do annoy
you and your fellows


Is there there a point in all this blabber someplace?


Tinnie is stumped again
 
wrong again crotch boy----you are engaging in silly sophistry which
simply ---IMMEDIATELY BACKFIRES on you. Did you know that since
1950 there has been a GENERAL BOYCOTT---not only of "ALL
PRODUCTS MADE IN ISRAEL --- BUT EVEN ON ANY COMPANY
IN THE WORLD THAT DOES BUSINESS WITH ISRAEL by all
"MUSLIM LANDS" ???? the concept was that by so doing---
the pigs and dogs would accomplish a STARVATION SIEGE

"collective punishment" "WAR CRIMES"
----do not use those terms
because now you have to eat them
A boycott on Israeli products, is not the same thing as a military quarantine of an entire area with 1.5 million people.

No one should be punished for a crime they didn't commit. That is the basis of making "collective punishment" a war crime. And this blockade collectively punishes everyone in Gaza.
Nations may indeed decide whether or not to have economic or any relations with other states. It may not interfere in the lawful right of nations (including Palestine) to engage politically, economically or other legal ways with countries it chooses.

Blockading Gaza is illegal. Doing so is an act of war. It’s also a crime against humanity. So is brutality in any form as well as high-seas piracy.


“No State may exercise any kind of jurisdiction over foreign vessels as long as there is no suspicion of slave trading, weapons or drug smuggling, piracy or unauthorized broadcasting. Since none of these exceptions existed, Israel had no right to stop and seize Estelle.”

“Imposing a naval blockade is only possible in an International Armed Conflict which requires at least two conflicting States. Since Israel does not recognize the State of Palestine, the conditions for an International Armed Conflict are not fulfilled.”

“Therefore, there is also no legal ground to impose a naval blockade on the Gaza Strip.”

No State may exercise any kind of jurisdiction over foreign vessels as long as there is no suspicion of slave trading, weapons or drug smuggling,
 
It is not a siege on food. It is a siege on freedom.

The food thing is a straw man.

A “siege on freedom”? Really, tinny?

Based on its founding principles and stated goals, could anyone reasonably state that the Hamas terrorist syndicate is suited to further “freedom” and lead an Gazan democracy?
This does seem a fox and henhouse analogy.

As for Hamas, of course it is a violent “Palestinian” franchise of the Moslem Brotherhood.

My concern with murderous, criminally insane politico-religious throwbacks is two-fold:
1) the example of Hamas in forcibly establishing Islamist law, as they interpret it upon the citizens of Gaza. This is antidemocratic and anti-freedom.
2) their hate speech which spurs their criminally insane minions toward actions and calls for violence against "Jews"--not merely Israelis (and even that is a concern).

What is the ultimate goal of Hamas and the ideology they seek to enact? Would you describe calls for genocide counter to democratic principles?

Can we expect acceptance of Hamas in a reconciled “Palestinian” government, without elimination of the pro-violence, anti-democratic, and antisemitic (not merely anti-Israel) provisions of the Hamas charter?
 
wrong again crotch boy----you are engaging in silly sophistry which
simply ---IMMEDIATELY BACKFIRES on you. Did you know that since
1950 there has been a GENERAL BOYCOTT---not only of "ALL
PRODUCTS MADE IN ISRAEL --- BUT EVEN ON ANY COMPANY
IN THE WORLD THAT DOES BUSINESS WITH ISRAEL by all
"MUSLIM LANDS" ???? the concept was that by so doing---
the pigs and dogs would accomplish a STARVATION SIEGE

"collective punishment" "WAR CRIMES"
----do not use those terms
because now you have to eat them
A boycott on Israeli products, is not the same thing as a military quarantine of an entire area with 1.5 million people.

No one should be punished for a crime they didn't commit. That is the basis of making "collective punishment" a war crime. And this blockade collectively punishes everyone in Gaza.
Nations may indeed decide whether or not to have economic or any relations with other states. It may not interfere in the lawful right of nations (including Palestine) to engage politically, economically or other legal ways with countries it chooses.

Blockading Gaza is illegal. Doing so is an act of war. It’s also a crime against humanity. So is brutality in any form as well as high-seas piracy.


“No State may exercise any kind of jurisdiction over foreign vessels as long as there is no suspicion of slave trading, weapons or drug smuggling, piracy or unauthorized broadcasting. Since none of these exceptions existed, Israel had no right to stop and seize Estelle.”

“Imposing a naval blockade is only possible in an International Armed Conflict which requires at least two conflicting States. Since Israel does not recognize the State of Palestine, the conditions for an International Armed Conflict are not fulfilled.”

“Therefore, there is also no legal ground to impose a naval blockade on the Gaza Strip.”

No State may exercise any kind of jurisdiction over foreign vessels as long as there is no suspicion of slave trading, weapons or drug smuggling,

Good point. There was no question that the flotilla did not have any arms. All boats were inspected by the authorities at the ports of departure. Journalists and others were invited to inspect the cargo. When confronted at sea. the flotilla volunteered to have an international organization like the Red Cross or UN inspect the vessels at sea.

The allegation that there might be weapons is pure bullshit.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Jos
A boycott on Israeli products, is not the same thing as a military quarantine of an entire area with 1.5 million people.

No one should be punished for a crime they didn't commit. That is the basis of making "collective punishment" a war crime. And this blockade collectively punishes everyone in Gaza.

No State may exercise any kind of jurisdiction over foreign vessels as long as there is no suspicion of slave trading, weapons or drug smuggling,

Good point. There was no question that the flotilla did not have any arms. All boats were inspected by the authorities at the ports of departure. Journalists and others were invited to inspect the cargo. When confronted at sea. the flotilla volunteered to have an international organization like the Red Cross or UN inspect the vessels at sea.

The allegation that there might be weapons is pure bullshit.

Obviously a matter of opinion----cargo that comes into the
USA gets "INSPECTED" very very very carefully---and some
how your friends STILL manage to import tons of HEROIN
---for sale to support the activities of your friends
I have been told by an agent that the stuff comes in black
cakes STAMPED with an encouraging motif of
CROSSED SCIMITARS << touching , is it not??

since when did the red cross develope an expertise
in security?
 
No State may exercise any kind of jurisdiction over foreign vessels as long as there is no suspicion of slave trading, weapons or drug smuggling,

Good point. There was no question that the flotilla did not have any arms. All boats were inspected by the authorities at the ports of departure. Journalists and others were invited to inspect the cargo. When confronted at sea. the flotilla volunteered to have an international organization like the Red Cross or UN inspect the vessels at sea.

The allegation that there might be weapons is pure bullshit.

Obviously a matter of opinion----cargo that comes into the
USA gets "INSPECTED" very very very carefully---and some
how your friends STILL manage to import tons of HEROIN
---for sale to support the activities of your friends
I have been told by an agent that the stuff comes in black
cakes STAMPED with an encouraging motif of
CROSSED SCIMITARS << touching , is it not??

since when did the red cross develope an expertise
in security?

cargo that comes into the
USA gets "INSPECTED"

Are you saying that the Palestinians had the right to inspect the cargo on arrival?
 
A boycott on Israeli products, is not the same thing as a military quarantine of an entire area with 1.5 million people.

No one should be punished for a crime they didn't commit. That is the basis of making "collective punishment" a war crime. And this blockade collectively punishes everyone in Gaza.

No State may exercise any kind of jurisdiction over foreign vessels as long as there is no suspicion of slave trading, weapons or drug smuggling,

Good point. There was no question that the flotilla did not have any arms. All boats were inspected by the authorities at the ports of departure. Journalists and others were invited to inspect the cargo. When confronted at sea. the flotilla volunteered to have an international organization like the Red Cross or UN inspect the vessels at sea.

The allegation that there might be weapons is pure bullshit.

For some reason, there is a suspicion whenever your terrorist buddies are involved.
 
For some reason, there is a suspicion whenever your terrorist buddies are involved.

It's called paranoia
Paranoia [&#716;pær&#601;&#712;n&#596;&#618;.&#601;] (adjective: paranoid [&#712;pær&#601;.n&#596;&#618;d]) is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion. Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory beliefs, or beliefs of conspiracy concerning a perceived threat towards oneself.
Paranoia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
For some reason, there is a suspicion whenever your terrorist buddies are involved.

It's called paranoia
Paranoia [&#716;pær&#601;&#712;n&#596;&#618;.&#601;] (adjective: paranoid [&#712;pær&#601;.n&#596;&#618;d]) is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion. Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory beliefs, or beliefs of conspiracy concerning a perceived threat towards oneself.
Paranoia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yeah, I'd be paranoid about your terrorist buddies smuggling more weapons using boats.
Probably has something to do with your terrorist buddies firing rockets into civilian areas.
 
For some reason, there is a suspicion whenever your terrorist buddies are involved.

It's called paranoia
Paranoia [&#716;pær&#601;&#712;n&#596;&#618;.&#601;] (adjective: paranoid [&#712;pær&#601;.n&#596;&#618;d]) is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion. Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory beliefs, or beliefs of conspiracy concerning a perceived threat towards oneself.
Paranoia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yeah, I'd be paranoid about your terrorist buddies smuggling more weapons using boats.
Probably has something to do with your terrorist buddies firing rockets into civilian areas.

Smuggling is an interesting term. Palestinian law states that it is legal for Palestine to import and manufacture weapons.
 

Yeah, I'd be paranoid about your terrorist buddies smuggling more weapons using boats.
Probably has something to do with your terrorist buddies firing rockets into civilian areas.

Smuggling is an interesting term. Palestinian law states that it is legal for Palestine to import and manufacture weapons.

If your buddies weren't terrorists, that might mean something.
 

Yeah, I'd be paranoid about your terrorist buddies smuggling more weapons using boats.
Probably has something to do with your terrorist buddies firing rockets into civilian areas.

Smuggling is an interesting term. Palestinian law states that it is legal for Palestine to import and manufacture weapons.

You seem befuddled regarding international law and an armed Islamic terrorist enclave firing rockets at a sovereign nation.
 
Yeah, I'd be paranoid about your terrorist buddies smuggling more weapons using boats.
Probably has something to do with your terrorist buddies firing rockets into civilian areas.

Smuggling is an interesting term. Palestinian law states that it is legal for Palestine to import and manufacture weapons.

If your buddies weren't terrorists, that might mean something.

Terrorist is another interesting propaganda term.
 
Yeah, I'd be paranoid about your terrorist buddies smuggling more weapons using boats.
Probably has something to do with your terrorist buddies firing rockets into civilian areas.

Smuggling is an interesting term. Palestinian law states that it is legal for Palestine to import and manufacture weapons.

You seem befuddled regarding international law and an armed Islamic terrorist enclave firing rockets at a sovereign nation.

????

Where is this sovereign nation you are talking about. Where are its borders?
 
Based on its founding principles and stated goals, could anyone reasonably state that the Hamas terrorist syndicate is suited to further “freedom” and lead an Gazan democracy?
No one has the right to make that call, except the Palestinian's living in Gaza and Israel has no right whatsoever to deny them their right to self-determination.

BTW, Hamas members have stated many times they're willing to accept a two-state solution based on the '67 borders, but you continually dismiss it as bullshit, yet when they make off-the-cuff remarks about "open war" with Israel, in response to its 45 year occupation of Palestinian land, you treat it as gospel.

Awe, the beauty of the illogical-paradox!
 
Good point. There was no question that the flotilla did not have any arms. All boats were inspected by the authorities at the ports of departure. Journalists and others were invited to inspect the cargo. When confronted at sea. the flotilla volunteered to have an international organization like the Red Cross or UN inspect the vessels at sea.

The allegation that there might be weapons is pure bullshit.

Obviously a matter of opinion----cargo that comes into the
USA gets "INSPECTED" very very very carefully---and some
how your friends STILL manage to import tons of HEROIN
---for sale to support the activities of your friends
I have been told by an agent that the stuff comes in black
cakes STAMPED with an encouraging motif of
CROSSED SCIMITARS << touching , is it not??

since when did the red cross develope an expertise
in security?

cargo that comes into the
USA gets "INSPECTED"

Are you saying that the Palestinians had the right to inspect the cargo on arrival?



rosie>>>
it interests me that two eager terrorist ass lickers --jos and sherri --both
endorsed tinnie's terrorist fart.

An interesting factoid regarding the filth of all three is that US homeland
security had actually consulted Israeli experts regarding cargo brought into
the ports of New York City----in danger of being USED to cover up islamo nazi
"IMPORTS" -------they seem to assume that when it comes to smugging
their baby murdering machinery------ALL ISLAMO NAZI PIGS
use the same techniques and Israel has experience with the
islamo nazi filth ----they are probably right ----on
this board they are all of the same blood thirsty jihadist mind
 

Forum List

Back
Top