Soggy in NOLA
Diamond Member
- Jul 31, 2009
- 40,565
- 5,359
- 1,830
that law is already in place fool
Why should they be discriminated against?
Exactly.. thank you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that law is already in place fool
Why should they be discriminated against?
See... I am the one with the idea that supports true equal treatment and government non-intervention on matters that do not involved governmental operations.... and the GM supporters still don't like it... why?? simple... because it is not really about equal treatment.. it is about recognition, acceptance, advancing an agenda, and stickittothemanitis... it is about the government being used as a tool forcing those things
that law is already in place fool
Why should they be discriminated against?
Exactly.. thank you.
I think many Catholics/Christians and other religious people are tired of this fight.
Because people are realizing it's not a big deal. When the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled gay marriage was legal close to 70% of people in the state were opposed to the decision. Today, the majority support it. Why? In my opinion because they've seen that it hasn't harmed a soul. The only state where there has really been a backlash is in Iowa where all the Supreme Court judges who were up for reelection this year got voted out and well, that's Iowa.
See... I am the one with the idea that supports true equal treatment and government non-intervention on matters that do not involved governmental operations.... and the GM supporters still don't like it... why?? simple... because it is not really about equal treatment.. it is about recognition, acceptance, advancing an agenda, and stickittothemanitis... it is about the government being used as a tool forcing those things
Why should they be discriminated against?
Exactly.. thank you.
Because there is no right for group marriage in the US.
There is however a restriction on people to marry the ONE person they love.
You people are on the wrong side of histroy as always.
So, everyone should have the 'right' to marry whomever/whatever/however many they love and have legal protection in certain areas of the law because of that? Really?
yes... so long as we're talking about consent adults.
So, you're for any adult polygamist relatiotionship? 10 people? 20 people? Is there any limit?
that law is already in place fool
Why should they be discriminated against?
Exactly.. thank you.
Because there is no right for group marriage in the US.
There is however a restriction on people to marry the ONE person they love.
You people are on the wrong side of histroy as always.
Why should they be discriminated against?
Exactly.. thank you.
Because there is no right for group marriage in the US.
There is however a restriction on people to marry the ONE person they love.
You people are on the wrong side of histroy as always.
See... I am the one with the idea that supports true equal treatment and government non-intervention on matters that do not involved governmental operations.... and the GM supporters still don't like it... why?? simple... because it is not really about equal treatment.. it is about recognition, acceptance, advancing an agenda, and stickittothemanitis... it is about the government being used as a tool forcing those things
marriage is a creation of government, so you can't have government 'nonintervention' in regard to government creatred rights and obligations.
no matter how much homophobes rail against it.
Exactly.. thank you.
Because there is no right for group marriage in the US.
There is however a restriction on people to marry the ONE person they love.
You people are on the wrong side of histroy as always.
So, if they would then decide to form a group to get their rights, just like the gays did, you would be all for it then?
The tax credit for kids is about building the future of the US.
Its money well spent
Exactly.. thank you.
Because there is no right for group marriage in the US.
There is however a restriction on people to marry the ONE person they love.
You people are on the wrong side of histroy as always.
So, if they would then decide to form a group to get their rights, just like the gays did, you would be all for it then?
yes... so long as we're talking about consent adults.
So, you're for any adult polygamist relatiotionship? 10 people? 20 people? Is there any limit?
do you always go for the strawman instead of discussing real issues?
do you appreciate it when people talk about how christians want to take over secular schools and force us to live in a theocracy?
or is that exaggerating the circumstances as regards the norm?
Because there is no right for group marriage in the US.
There is however a restriction on people to marry the ONE person they love.
You people are on the wrong side of histroy as always.
So, if they would then decide to form a group to get their rights, just like the gays did, you would be all for it then?
No because every where the group marriages have exsisted they end up abusing children sexually.
Its why its illegal fool
See... I am the one with the idea that supports true equal treatment and government non-intervention on matters that do not involved governmental operations.... and the GM supporters still don't like it... why?? simple... because it is not really about equal treatment.. it is about recognition, acceptance, advancing an agenda, and stickittothemanitis... it is about the government being used as a tool forcing those things
marriage is a creation of government, so you can't have government 'nonintervention' in regard to government creatred rights and obligations.
no matter how much homophobes rail against it.
I think many Catholics/Christians and other religious people are tired of this fight.
Because people are realizing it's not a big deal. When the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled gay marriage was legal close to 70% of people in the state were opposed to the decision. Today, the majority support it. Why? In my opinion because they've seen that it hasn't harmed a soul. The only state where there has really been a backlash is in Iowa where all the Supreme Court judges who were up for reelection this year got voted out and well, that's Iowa.