Gay marriage legal in Massachussetts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally posted by KLSuddeth
normal? abnormal?

If homosexuality isnt normal whatever that means, please tell me why its ok for 2 women to be going at it in the porn that most guys love to look at AND fantasize about being in the middle of it?

Just curious

Well, as much as I liked being with two ladies on a couple of occasions neither occasion involved them going at it with each other, it was strictly females on male:D I personally ff past the lesbo scenes in my skin flicks as I like to see an end result:D
 
That was a good answer - I see your point.

Note - I said I SEE your point....I even respect it.
I am not against homosexual marriage though, and I dont expect that to change.

But you made yoour point - thanks :)

*this is directed to freedom*
 
Originally posted by OCA
See, logic says that as a human being we were born with the innate urge to breed with the opposite sex,


No. Some are born with different urges. Logic is silent on the topic.
well biology says that also, so if those two factors are really insisputable than the lifestyle choice really doesn't have to prove anything because those are two pretty strong arguments right there.

Maybe these are natural population controls. Jever think of that, Wisenstein?
 
Two girls is different, because they do not inflict the damage that is caused by to males ripping each others anus apart in attempts to impregnate each others fecal matter.
 
so its ok as long as they (the 2 men) do not engage in anal sex?
Oral is ok?
 
Why is it more important to liberals to be seen as PC than to make a simple choice between normal and abnormal concerning homosexuality?
 
Originally posted by Sir Evil
Visually disgusting Big's, but I think it's a sense of homosexualality any way you slice it!

Please don't discuss the scents of homosexuality.
 
Originally posted by OCA
Why is it more important to liberals to be seen as PC than to make a simple choice between normal and abnormal concerning homosexuality?

How about a simple choice about race based discrimination? Is it right or wrong? That's the simple choice I'd like YOU to make. Since we're comparing wish lists.
 
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
No. Some are born with different urges. Logic is silent on the topic.


Maybe these are natural population controls. Jever think of that, Wisenstein?

Nice try at grabbing straws. Better luck next time. Maybe you ought to leave this thread to the big boys and go play with the tonka trucks.
 
Originally posted by OCA
Nice try at grabbing straws. Better luck next time. Maybe you ought to leave this thread to the big boys and go play with the tonka trucks.

Nice usage of the most worn out metaphor known to man.

Maybe you and the big boys should go in the backroom and discuss changing some of your previous choices, so you could get to know each other better.
 
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
How about a simple choice about race based discrimination? Is it right or wrong? That's the simple choice I'd like YOU to make. Since we're comparing wish lists.

AA isn't raced based discrimination therefore it is a complete and ridiculous fallacy that I support race based discrimination. But by all means change the subject if you think it will deflect attention away from the pummelling you are taking here.
 
Originally posted by Sir Evil
No worries, the visuals are bad enough not sure that I could handle the scents!:D

What's that smell, it smells like beef and vaseline.
 
Originally posted by OCA
AA isn't raced based discrimination therefore it is a complete and ridiculous fallacy that I support race based discrimination. But by all means change the subject if you think it will deflect attention away from the pummelling you are taking here.

It is race based discrimination. It's primary effect is to be discriminatory. So it's not really fallacious. You support racial discrimination. If you want to argue that it's not THAT MUCH racial discrimination, that's a fair argument, but I hate seeing you lie to yourself and others.
 
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Please don't discuss the scents of homosexuality.

Yeah dammit! You are giving RWA a stiffy and he can't type and spank it at the same time.

BTW RWA I will not fly to Atlanta and fuck your ass just because you beg me in a PM, I cannot be bought off!
 
Originally posted by OCA
Yeah dammit! You are giving RWA a stiffy and he can't type and spank it at the same time.

BTW RWA I will not fly to Atlanta and fuck your ass just because you beg me in a PM, I cannot be bought off!

Act III, full transformation into monkey-like imbecile.
 
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
It is race based discrimination. It's primary effect is to be discriminatory. So it's not really fallacious. You support racial discrimination. If you want to argue that it's not THAT MUCH racial discrimination, that's a fair argument, but I hate seeing you lie to yourself and others.

Oh *sigh* everyone knows that i'm not discriminatory nor is AA in most cases discriminatory against whites but by all means continue on with your irrational rant little guy.
 
Originally posted by OCA
Oh *sigh* everyone knows that i'm not discriminatory nor is AA in most cases discriminatory against whites but by all means continue on with your irrational rant little guy.

Yeah. Sometimes white people get jobs, so i guess your full race based lockout is yet to be achieved. Better luck with your agenda going forward, Malcolm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top