Gay Marriage is NOT "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival."

[del]

Apparently none of you idiots can defend the abominable lifestyle you've chosen, so you have to resort to attacks. You liberals fucks are so predictable.

tissue, sweetie?

What are you, ten?

is that too old for you?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Apparently none of you idiots can defend the abominable lifestyle you've chosen, so you have to resort to attacks.

You Lonestar fucks are so predictable.

I'm defending the notion that no one should have to defend themselves to you and your abominable opinion.

It's immaterial to the constitutional outcome, remember?

Then why are you idiots so defensive?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

tissue, sweetie?

What are you, ten?

is that too old for you?

Was the question too hard for you?

 

[del]

What are you, ten?

is that too old for you?

Was the question too hard for you?

you said *hard*

closet case.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

is that too old for you?

Was the question too hard for you?

you said *hard*

closet case.

I'll take that as a yes, the question was too hard for you.

And no I didn't say hard, I typed the word hard, damn you liberals are stupid.

 

[del]

Was the question too hard for you?

you said *hard*

closet case.

I'll take that as a yes, the question was too hard for you.

And no I didn't say hard, I typed the word hard, damn you liberals are stupid.

stupid doesn't even begin to encompass the lack of intelligence indicated by categorizing me as a liberal, queenie.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

you said *hard*

closet case.

I'll take that as a yes, the question was too hard for you.

And no I didn't say hard, I typed the word hard, damn you liberals are stupid.

stupid doesn't even begin to encompass the lack of intelligence indicated by categorizing me as a liberal, queenie.

If I was a liberal I'd deny it too.

 

[del]

I'll take that as a yes, the question was too hard for you.

And no I didn't say hard, I typed the word hard, damn you liberals are stupid.

stupid doesn't even begin to encompass the lack of intelligence indicated by categorizing me as a liberal, queenie.

If I was a liberal I'd deny it too.

i didn't deny it, stupid.

call me what you want; i've been called worse by better.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

stupid doesn't even begin to encompass the lack of intelligence indicated by categorizing me as a liberal, queenie.

If I was a liberal I'd deny it too.

i didn't deny it, stupid.

call me what you want; i've been called worse by better.

No you haven't.

 

[del]

If I was a liberal I'd deny it too.

i didn't deny it, stupid.

call me what you want; i've been called worse by better.

No you haven't.

snappy comeback, queenie.

 

[bodecea]

Obviously you don't. But that's because you're too fucking stupid to care. I pity idiots like you.

Who are you kidding? You get neck strain looking up at othere people on the intelligence scale.

I wouldn't shit ya, you're my favorite turd!


Albeit a stupid one.

So....THAT's what you're into. Ugh.

 

[bodecea]

you said *hard*

closet case.

I'll take that as a yes, the question was too hard for you.

And no I didn't say hard, I typed the word hard, damn you liberals are stupid.

stupid doesn't even begin to encompass the lack of intelligence indicated by categorizing me as a liberal, queenie.

Sad to say...in Texas he just MIGHT be considered a genius.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Both concessions are duly noted.

Come back when either of you have a intelligent argument to make.

 

[bodecea]

Both concessions are duly noted.

Come back when either of you have a intelligent argument to make.

It's even funnier that you think anyone here has conceded to you.

 

[Ravi]

Would you believe mal pos repped me for that...

I ALWAYS PosRep you, Ravioli... Tell the Truth.



peace...

Yes, it's true. You always pos rep me because I'm always right.

 

[Carol]

Thanks to Psiheyhackr, I have this great quote from Isaac Asimor

“The difference between understanding and not understanding is also the difference between respect and admiration on the one side, and hate and fear on the other.”

I think this really applies to our attitude and opinions regarding many things and espeically homosexuality.

 

[mal]

Would you believe mal pos repped me for that...

I ALWAYS PosRep you, Ravioli... Tell the Truth.



peace...

Yes, it's true. You always pos rep me because I'm always right.

I do it because the Negativity that Defines your Existence makes me kinda Sad...

So I try to Cheer ya up, Kid!...



peace...

 

[ConHog]

I ALWAYS PosRep you, Ravioli... Tell the Truth.



peace...

Yes, it's true. You always pos rep me because I'm always right.

I do it because the Negativity that Defines your Existence makes me kinda Sad...

So I try to Cheer ya up, Kid!...



peace...

The sad thing is, Ravi honestly believes she's always right, which is of course the ultimate proof of ignorance.

 

[mal]

And marriage has been defined by the SCOTUS as a union between one man and one woman.

No it hasn't....unless you want to prove your statement with a link.

More than a century ago, the U.S. Supreme Court spoke of the "union for life of one man and one woman in the holy estate of matrimony." Murphy v. Ramsey, 114 U.S. 15, 45 (1985)

And it has also been defined as a union between one man and one woman in the Defense Of Marriage Act, which I've posted below.

104th CONGRESS 2D SESSION

H.R. 3396

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Mr. BARR of Georgia (for himself, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Ms. MYRICK, Mr. VOLKMER, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. BRYANT, and Mr. EMERSON) introduced the following bill, which was referred to the Committee on_____________

A BILL

To define and protect the institution of marriage.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the "Defense of Marriage Act".

SEC. 2. POWERS RESERVED TO THE STATES.

(a) IN GENERAL. -- Chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding after section 1738B the following:

Section 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof

"No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such relationship."

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT. -- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 115 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1738B the following new item: "1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof."

SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.

(a) IN GENERAL. -- Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

"Section 7. Definition of 'marriage' and 'spouse'

"In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife."

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT. -- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 6 the following new item:

"7. Definition of 'marriage' and 'spouse'."

"Defense Of Marriage Act" 5/96 H.R. 3396 Summary/Analysis

del almost did it... You posted the above, and as deldo's is Job in Life, he tried to Shit all over what he could not deal with in the Hopes that Playing with his own Fecal would Distract from the Substance you Posted...

Not today.



peace...

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Both concessions are duly noted.

Come back when either of you have a intelligent argument to make.

It's even funnier that you think anyone here has conceded to you.

Oh but they have and that includes you. All you have is personal attacks and insults, you have no intelligent argument to make.