It is a Right, and I have Explained why... People don't get to Redifine our Natural Existence Exclusively for ONE Deviation from what is just because they want to.
Religion is Irrelevant in my Argument, and in the one Made by the Supreme Court in Loving.
peace...
Our "natural design" is a Monkey. Or wait, stuff before that. "Natural Design" is a pair of hands. A pair of hands can be used for many things, but they're not all legal. Natural design therefore should not govern what's legal and not, because natural design (we have canine toofies) would have us eating...............................each other.
Natural Design, determining law, is a stupid premise.
In your Opinion...
It is in Fact a Fact that what Distinguishes Heteros and Homos is the Ability to ProCreate...
A Responsibility that a Civil Society Protects and Sanctions.
But guess what, Homosexuals are also Capable of ProCreation, but only when they Marry Flesh with the Opposite Sex...
As we were Designed to do by Nature.
peace...
"PROTECTS" in what way? Currently, being gay is not "illegal" and our population is booming, too-much in fact. Our society needs less world Citizens currently, because of the amount of non-renewable and inadequate resources. So again, another faulty premise because slowing the population growth isn't fucking bad at all. No, this is not a call for Eugenics.