Gallup Tracking Obama Up 6% Plus One Party Government Now Preferred!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
Soon local governments can go back to the cheap voting machines again. The local Democratic Precinct Ward Official can deliver the count, as is usual.

And in fact, as is usual, there is no Sicilian--at the top of any ticket--out running, again, this year.

The most recent Gallup Tracking has Obama up 6% over Romney, at 50% to 44% according to their multi-day track. Even Rasmussen has Obama leading.

And so last week, Gallup also finds that mostly people now prefer a one-party government!

Americans' Preference Shifts Toward One-Party Government

China has long understood this need best, and the economy in fact is "slowing" down to a 7% growth rate. Conservatives still live in Bush I, Term I, before Bill Clinton on the matter of China. Central authority regrouped, and recentralized--after the decentralization. In China, Big Corporations and Banking happen when central policy is met, and that is not decentralized.

Socialism Today - China's hybrid economy

And the link notes what is widely well known, and even before the crash.

So if there is a one-party government preference, then there is the winning President, the Winning Senate, and only a House needing Change You Can Believe In!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(France, of course, has its own revolutionary history itself: Of a proper working relationship with the rich! Even among the English, Her Majesty long ago, in fact, consented to be taxed. The Royals, too, seem to know that the new Credit Market Money needs to be spread around--bills getting paid and not defaulted--for matters even picture perfect to work! The Danes are apparently, long since on board, with this concept--spreading things around, themselves! There is all kinds of Interest in the West--and likely in the Wild West, at least--about the Royals, spreading themselves around!)
 
Last edited:
One Party Government Is Clearly Preferred, 38% in the reporting, whereas only 23% want different parties in control. And that was last month!

ABC Washington Post found Romney so unlikeable, that better they could say, "68% had a favorable impression of President Obama, whereas 71% of our survey found Governor Romney to really be a first class asshole!"

Now, they even have proof! The videotape of the dance with with the wealthy is starting to get reflected in other polls.

Really. . . .wide gaps. . . .are being noticed(?)! 38% to 23% is a really wide gap!

So the trend reported in the Gallup results tends to be corroborated in other polling.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations--notice even gap between them, and "victims" alleged in the dance before the rich wolves, somewhere in the territories!)
 
Last edited:
I would normally support diversity 3-4 parties, the problem is when more people from the fringe get voted in, like in 2010.
 
It is not directly shown, but the Rise of the Tea Party Fringe coincides with the U. S. Credit Rating lowering. The House Republicans were headed toward default. Moody's actually took direct fault with that one party.

That was months ago, and is not now looming large. Senate leader Reid is working with the Republicans on acceptable alternatives to the Fiscal Cliff, which includes Defense Cuts.

So what Bad News anyone is hearing about economies: Is Default threats looming in Europe. All this year anyone has heard about the Default threats actually in Europe!

The Democrats are not identified with that threat at all.

The Fringe Tea Party actually wanted to take credit for it, In the United States.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great Half-Wit Father in Washington: Now noted for the better side(?)! Do that more and Mickey Mouse maybe stop being jealous(?)! Anyone notices that serious debate preparations are probably underway! "Oh! Who's The Leader Of The Club that's made for you and me?! B-A-R! A-C-K! O-B-A-M-A(?)!)
 
I would normally support diversity 3-4 parties, the problem is when more people from the fringe get voted in, like in 2010.

Actually, the fringers were voted out... and you will see even more of this come November. The Dems have accomplished NOTHING... they can't even get a budget done.

They're toast.
 
It doesn't surprise me that preference for a one party system is on the rise. Our country has become so polarized and partisan, no doubt nearly 4 in 10 people prefer autocracy.
 
We already have 1 party the sheeple just think there is a difference so they remain passive little drones easy to control.
 
One party is the preference? Really?
From your source:
38% prefer a one party presidency and Congress. That's not like 51% prefer a one party government.

Really. What the GOP did for the last four years is unacceptable. The country made it's choice and the butt hurt republicans threw a snit fit over it. It's time to see what a UNITED government can do for America.
 
One party is the preference? Really?
From your source:
38% prefer a one party presidency and Congress. That's not like 51% prefer a one party government.

Really. What the GOP did for the last four years is unacceptable. The country made it's choice and the butt hurt republicans threw a snit fit over it. It's time to see what a UNITED government can do for America.

See how far that 38% takes you on your ride to utopia, Huggy. :eusa_hand:
 
One party is the preference? Really?
From your source:
38% prefer a one party presidency and Congress. That's not like 51% prefer a one party government.

Really. What the GOP did for the last four years is unacceptable. The country made it's choice and the butt hurt republicans threw a snit fit over it. It's time to see what a UNITED government can do for America.

See how far that 38% takes you on your ride to utopia, Huggy. :eusa_hand:

It's not "my" ride. There is no utopia. Big business would prefer the economy to grow despite their record profits. They need more customers. The newGOPers don't understand that a strong middle class is vital to growth. Crazy ideologues don't manage well.
 
One Party Government Is Clearly Preferred, 38% in the reporting, whereas only 23% want different parties in control. And that was last month!
[...]
What I take from the one party rule answer (of which 38% is a plurality over the other two options) is that some large number of democrats would like all three branches under exclusive democrat control, and some lesser number of republicans would like all three branches under exclusive republican control.

This suggests, to me at least, that republicans are more inclined towards bi-partisanship as an electorate than are democrats, and that is an indication of greater tolerance for philosophical differences.

It has been my observation over fifty years of political activity, that that has indeed been the case.
 
Last edited:
Really. What the GOP did for the last four years is unacceptable. The country made it's choice and the butt hurt republicans threw a snit fit over it. It's time to see what a UNITED government can do for America.

See how far that 38% takes you on your ride to utopia, Huggy. :eusa_hand:

It's not "my" ride. There is no utopia. Big business would prefer the economy to grow despite their record profits. They need more customers. The newGOPers don't understand that a strong middle class is vital to growth. Crazy ideologues don't manage well.

Yet the medium income has dwindled nearly 5,000 dollars under Obama's tenure. Obama has no plan except to spend more of taxpayers money. His empty rhetoric isn't going to make it happen, Huggy.
 
About four words can win the next four debates.

"Now, most of the bad economic news is from Europe, Not From the Bush Administration!"
They left in bad news, they created bad news, and then as the opposition: Their own people created even more bad news!

You can even count the four words(?). . .or four-letter words(?)!

The two stupid guys, way too stupid: Have their own electoral base to contend with! Their very own people are just possibly being noticed the source of all the problems!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
(Sounds like a hit from SMERSH. . .or something(?)!"
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top