Will the Benghazi Debacle Be a Debate Question?
Four are dead in Libya and we know now they asked for increased security. They were denied. We originally heard from the White House that the riots were due to a nuisance film against the Prophet of Mohammad. They went with that until the real story was getting leaked shortly after and continued with that story until it was no use.
Now we know, that was imposssible and whistleblowers are coming forward and telling the real story. A Congressional hearing is called for next week.
The debate rules say, the topic called for is the Economy unless breaking news comes into play. Does this qualify for Breaking News? We have yet to hear from the president on this topic. He hasn't explained why this embassy was not fortified although the embassy was attacked earlier, as many as four times before this and the attacks were announced beforehand on facebook. We need an explanation. And if we can't get them from him voluntarily, we should get them from him during the debate.
Can it happen with a liberal commentary?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-more-security-before-libya-attack-lawmakers/
Four are dead in Libya and we know now they asked for increased security. They were denied. We originally heard from the White House that the riots were due to a nuisance film against the Prophet of Mohammad. They went with that until the real story was getting leaked shortly after and continued with that story until it was no use.
Now we know, that was imposssible and whistleblowers are coming forward and telling the real story. A Congressional hearing is called for next week.
The debate rules say, the topic called for is the Economy unless breaking news comes into play. Does this qualify for Breaking News? We have yet to hear from the president on this topic. He hasn't explained why this embassy was not fortified although the embassy was attacked earlier, as many as four times before this and the attacks were announced beforehand on facebook. We need an explanation. And if we can't get them from him voluntarily, we should get them from him during the debate.
Can it happen with a liberal commentary?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-more-security-before-libya-attack-lawmakers/
Last edited: