Further proof global warming is a hoax!

Science does not care about public opinion based on parroting fudge, fraud, and flat out lies.

Science cares about DATA, and the truth of the data is that, outside of Urban Heat Sink Effect, there is precisely NO EVIDENCE Earth is warming, and Co2 did not warm anything in the atmosphere.
As CO2 soaks up infrared energy, it vibrates and re-emits the infrared energy back in all directions. About half of that energy goes out into space, and about half of it returns to Earth as heat, contributing to the 'greenhouse effect.

A simple CO2 example is that if the atmosphere of venus were the same as earths atmosphere, venus would be same temperature as earth.
 
Science does not care about public opinion based on parroting fudge, fraud, and flat out lies.

Science cares about DATA, and the truth of the data is that, outside of Urban Heat Sink Effect, there is precisely NO EVIDENCE Earth is warming, and Co2 did not warm anything in the atmosphere.
Younger, better-educated Republicans are accepting the science, consistent with common sense and confirmed by demonstrable consequences. Incorrigible ideologues are upset by it.

An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people.



Screen Shot 2023-05-17 at 4.15.19 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-10-18 at 7.42.24 PM.png


OGC.gif
 
Better-informed, less ideologically dogmatic younger Republicans bode well for the future:
... Majorities of Americans say the federal government, businesses and other actors are doing too little to reduce the effects of climate change and express support for a variety of policy approaches aimed at addressing the issue...
The survey... finds that members of Generation Z, as well as Millennials (those born between 1981 and 1996), are more open than older Americans to some of the farther-reaching policy proposals related to climate change...
Roughly two-thirds of Gen Z adults (66%) and Millennials (64%) oppose increasing offshore oil and gas drilling, compared with 46% of Baby Boomer and older adults. There are similar generational differences over increasing the use of hydraulic fracturing. Among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, younger adults are much less inclined than their older counterparts to support the increased use of fossil fuel energy sources.
For example, Gen Z Republicans are 30 percentage points less likely than Baby Boomer and older Republicans (44% vs. 74%) to favor more hydraulic fracturing, the primary extraction technique for natural gas. There are similar generational divides among Republicans over expanding offshore oil and gas drilling, as well as coal mining.
Gen Z Republicans are about three times as likely as Baby Boomer and older Republicans to favor phasing out fossil fuel use entirely (20% vs. 6%). And roughly a third of Gen Z Republicans (34%) support phasing out gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035, compared with 14% of Republicans in the Baby Boomer and older generations.

Attitudes will change when they can't charge their cell phones, use their tablets or crank the air.
 

its explained there correctly.


LOL!!

It is explained much better here...

Two and only two measures of atmospheric temps = satellites and balloons


satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

Scientists were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data.


NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST THERE!!!


The satellites and balloons were highly correlated. Co2 went up, atmospheric temps did not = THEORY REJECTED

What came next was the most conflicted FUDGE JOB in science history


"Orbit Wobble" = fudge the satellite data higher

"shade issues" = which were constant and hence did not interfere with detection of temperature change = fudge the balloons higher




LOL!!


All your side has is FUDGE, FRAUD, and an army of PARROTING MORON SCIENCE INVALIDS



Does increasing atmospheric Co2 cause warming?

NO

THEORY REJECTED
 
As CO2 soaks up infrared energy, it vibrates and re-emits the infrared energy back in all directions.
does what it re-emit get hotter than what it absorbed? And doesn't half of that go to space? You remain stupid to the elites who control your strings puppet man.
 
yep, co2 cools, it radiates half of what it absorbs to space. Cooler. When a molecule emits it cools off.
There is a reason the venus atmosphere is 900F. Partly because its 75x as dense as ours, and partly because its mostly carbon dioxide. If venus had our atmosphere, it would be basically the same temperature as earth
 
According to calculations, maximum temperatures would be just around 35 °C (95 °F), given an Earth-like atmosphere.[41][42]

Thanks.

You know max temp is different than average temp?

What kind of bad math are they using to say max temps on Venus would be less than max temps on Earth?

Especially when you understand that Venus gets about double the energy per square meter as Earth.
 
Thanks.

You know max temp is different than average temp?

What kind of bad math are they using to say max temps on Venus would be less than max temps on Earth?

Especially when you understand that Venus gets about double the energy per square meter as Earth.
you can see about it at the references [41][42]

but also NASA says that the greenhouse effect on Venus makes in 700F hotter.
 

Forum List

Back
Top