ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
I don't hate anyone.
I'm simply documenting one more aspect of this empty suit that made and makes him an exceptionally poor choice for the position he holds.
In the past I have suggested that he might be better suited for, say...Deputy Undersectretary of Education.
It seems that more and more folks agree with this appraisal.
I admit to a Manichean outlook, which may or may not be perfect for political perspective, but I have no problem leaving that consideration to you...meaning, if you feel that oratorical ability and terrific smile gives one the credentials to be President of the United States...well, De gustibus non est disputandum.
Now, it seems that your post is an attempt to belittle the significance of the OP, and as such defines you as having all the depth of wallpaper.
Put a little effort into it!
So, and dont back peddle here, You believe that someone must be a good writer to be qualified for the POTUS, is that what youre saying? Or that being a good writer is a part of being the POTUS?
No one can agree with your appraisal that you just made up, in fact I would bet that NOT ONE PERSON has said he would be better at the Deputy Education whatever you said. You're welcome to prove me wrong.
You simply dislike the MAN. And all of your opinions come from that being your foundation. Sure today it's his biography, tomorrow it'll be the way he plays basketball or how he chews his food.
Yours is a very silly post.
1."You believe that someone must be a good writer to be qualified for the POTUS, "
Of course, I never said that. It doesn't set a good tone to your argument if you have to make things up.
You said
I'm simply documenting one more aspect of this empty suit that made and makes him an exceptionally poor choice for the position he holds.
Why did you say that if writing isnt at least part of what you think a POTUS be good at?