its his typical homo personal attack thingcant prove a negative
you FAIL
Prove you never sucked a dick or took it up the ass by another man.
where did that come from?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
its his typical homo personal attack thingcant prove a negative
you FAIL
Prove you never sucked a dick or took it up the ass by another man.
where did that come from?
you fucking morons are too fucking stupid for words
and bobo, you are the chief moron
incompetence. moronand since they have made multiple errorsActually you did.
Whoops!
So are you going to take back your claim that you can't prove something is unintentional? Yes or no?
the facts support that
still havent seen your facts to back up that it was intentional
Alright, I'll take that as a no. This is gonna be fun
Do explain how multiple instances of something happening lead to the conclusion that something was unintentional rather than intentional. Explain the reasoning behind that.
cant prove a negative
you FAIL
Prove you never sucked a dick or took it up the ass by another man.
where did that come from?
incompetence. moronand since they have made multiple errors
the facts support that
still havent seen your facts to back up that it was intentional
Alright, I'll take that as a no. This is gonna be fun
Do explain how multiple instances of something happening lead to the conclusion that something was unintentional rather than intentional. Explain the reasoning behind that.
sheeesh
how many fucking times do you have to be told that?
incompetence. moronand since they have made multiple errors
the facts support that
still havent seen your facts to back up that it was intentional
Alright, I'll take that as a no. This is gonna be fun
Do explain how multiple instances of something happening lead to the conclusion that something was unintentional rather than intentional. Explain the reasoning behind that.
sheeesh
how many fucking times do you have to be told that?
which one makes them look good?incompetence. moronAlright, I'll take that as a no. This is gonna be fun
Do explain how multiple instances of something happening lead to the conclusion that something was unintentional rather than intentional. Explain the reasoning behind that.
sheeesh
how many fucking times do you have to be told that?
No, dipshit. I want a reason why its incompetence as opposed to them competentently doing it on purpose. I'm aware that the choices are between incompetence or them lying. Repeating what you believe ad nauseum isn't the same as providing evidence for what you believe.
So. Again. What reason do you have to believe that something happening multiple times would lead one to the conclusion that it was incompetence.
which one makes them look good?incompetence. moron
sheeesh
how many fucking times do you have to be told that?
No, dipshit. I want a reason why its incompetence as opposed to them competentently doing it on purpose. I'm aware that the choices are between incompetence or them lying. Repeating what you believe ad nauseum isn't the same as providing evidence for what you believe.
So. Again. What reason do you have to believe that something happening multiple times would lead one to the conclusion that it was incompetence.
think about it
if you run a network, do you want people thinking you cant even get your graphics right?
no, you wouldnt
thus either its incompetence or they dont give a shit
which one makes them look good?No, dipshit. I want a reason why its incompetence as opposed to them competentently doing it on purpose. I'm aware that the choices are between incompetence or them lying. Repeating what you believe ad nauseum isn't the same as providing evidence for what you believe.
So. Again. What reason do you have to believe that something happening multiple times would lead one to the conclusion that it was incompetence.
think about it
if you run a network, do you want people thinking you cant even get your graphics right?
no, you wouldnt
thus either its incompetence or they dont give a shit
Maybe they care more about being a Republican propaganda machine than looking good, eh? If they wanted to look good they'd make provide some semblance of impartiality, which they clearly don't.
Thanks for posting the link about Fox news winning the right to misinform. I remember seeing and hearing that discussed before.which one makes them look good?
think about it
if you run a network, do you want people thinking you cant even get your graphics right?
no, you wouldnt
thus either its incompetence or they dont give a shit
Maybe they care more about being a Republican propaganda machine than looking good, eh? If they wanted to look good they'd make provide some semblance of impartiality, which they clearly don't.
The Corporations that own Fox News & Rush Limbaugh's radio stations don't efen care if they make a profit.
Think about how much money it costs presidential candidates for a 30 second commercial.
Now think about Rush getting to spew the GOP agenda to millions of Americans for 3 hours a day, and Fox spews bullshit on us 24/7.
Invaluable.
And no one watching Fox cares. Or, they believe those mistakes and won't believe you or me even if we prove them to be wrong. Look at Dive. He's justifying all those mistakes. He clearly doesn't see their agenda. He's brainwashed. He'll defend anything they do.
Oh, and by the way, Fox News doesn't just make mistake, they lie. And a court said they have the right to lie.
Fox News gets okay to misinform public, court ruling | Media Reform | CeaseSPIN.org
Here is your proof its not on accident. Checkmate Dive. You lose, again.
The attorneys for Fox, owned by media baron Rupert Murdock, successfully argued the First Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on the public airwaves.
except that link LIESThanks for posting the link about Fox news winning the right to misinform. I remember seeing and hearing that discussed before.Maybe they care more about being a Republican propaganda machine than looking good, eh? If they wanted to look good they'd make provide some semblance of impartiality, which they clearly don't.
The Corporations that own Fox News & Rush Limbaugh's radio stations don't efen care if they make a profit.
Think about how much money it costs presidential candidates for a 30 second commercial.
Now think about Rush getting to spew the GOP agenda to millions of Americans for 3 hours a day, and Fox spews bullshit on us 24/7.
Invaluable.
And no one watching Fox cares. Or, they believe those mistakes and won't believe you or me even if we prove them to be wrong. Look at Dive. He's justifying all those mistakes. He clearly doesn't see their agenda. He's brainwashed. He'll defend anything they do.
Oh, and by the way, Fox News doesn't just make mistake, they lie. And a court said they have the right to lie.
Fox News gets okay to misinform public, court ruling | Media Reform | CeaseSPIN.org
Here is your proof its not on accident. Checkmate Dive. You lose, again.
The attorneys for Fox, owned by media baron Rupert Murdock, successfully argued the First Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on the public airwaves.
yet those stations make huge profitswhich one makes them look good?
think about it
if you run a network, do you want people thinking you cant even get your graphics right?
no, you wouldnt
thus either its incompetence or they dont give a shit
Maybe they care more about being a Republican propaganda machine than looking good, eh? If they wanted to look good they'd make provide some semblance of impartiality, which they clearly don't.
The Corporations that own Fox News & Rush Limbaugh's radio stations don't efen care if they make a profit.
Think about how much money it costs presidential candidates for a 30 second commercial.
Now think about Rush getting to spew the GOP agenda to millions of Americans for 3 hours a day, and Fox spews bullshit on us 24/7.
Invaluable.
And no one watching Fox cares. Or, they believe those mistakes and won't believe you or me even if we prove them to be wrong. Look at Dive. He's justifying all those mistakes. He clearly doesn't see their agenda. He's brainwashed. He'll defend anything they do.
Oh, and by the way, Fox News doesn't just make mistake, they lie. And a court said they have the right to lie.
Fox News gets okay to misinform public, court ruling | Media Reform | CeaseSPIN.org
Here is your proof its not on accident. Checkmate Dive. You lose, again.
The attorneys for Fox, owned by media baron Rupert Murdock, successfully argued the First Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on the public airwaves.
yet those stations make huge profitsMaybe they care more about being a Republican propaganda machine than looking good, eh? If they wanted to look good they'd make provide some semblance of impartiality, which they clearly don't.
The Corporations that own Fox News & Rush Limbaugh's radio stations don't efen care if they make a profit.
Think about how much money it costs presidential candidates for a 30 second commercial.
Now think about Rush getting to spew the GOP agenda to millions of Americans for 3 hours a day, and Fox spews bullshit on us 24/7.
Invaluable.
And no one watching Fox cares. Or, they believe those mistakes and won't believe you or me even if we prove them to be wrong. Look at Dive. He's justifying all those mistakes. He clearly doesn't see their agenda. He's brainwashed. He'll defend anything they do.
Oh, and by the way, Fox News doesn't just make mistake, they lie. And a court said they have the right to lie.
Fox News gets okay to misinform public, court ruling | Media Reform | CeaseSPIN.org
Here is your proof its not on accident. Checkmate Dive. You lose, again.
The attorneys for Fox, owned by media baron Rupert Murdock, successfully argued the First Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on the public airwaves.
go figure
bobo the moron shows he is a fucking moron once again
ya know, i find it amazing that Nik and Bobo are here defending Fox News
i'm calling them incompetent
they are saying they arent
wonders never cease
LOLya know, i find it amazing that Nik and Bobo are here defending Fox News
i'm calling them incompetent
they are saying they arent
wonders never cease
Fox News has always been very competent. The only problem is that it has no desire to actually portray information honestly.
LOLya know, i find it amazing that Nik and Bobo are here defending Fox News
i'm calling them incompetent
they are saying they arent
wonders never cease
Fox News has always been very competent. The only problem is that it has no desire to actually portray information honestly.
keep defending them
so, like you, they keep making themselves look stupid on purposeLOLFox News has always been very competent. The only problem is that it has no desire to actually portray information honestly.
keep defending them
Umm saying that they purposefully mislead and lie the public for propaganda purposes isn't exactly a "defense". Mussolini, after all, did make the trains run on time but thats not exactly a ringing endorsement of his regime.
so, like you, they keep making themselves look stupid on purposeLOL
keep defending them
Umm saying that they purposefully mislead and lie the public for propaganda purposes isn't exactly a "defense". Mussolini, after all, did make the trains run on time but thats not exactly a ringing endorsement of his regime.
so, like you, they keep making themselves look stupid on purposeLOL
keep defending them
Umm saying that they purposefully mislead and lie the public for propaganda purposes isn't exactly a "defense". Mussolini, after all, did make the trains run on time but thats not exactly a ringing endorsement of his regime.