For the Board's liberals, here's an interesting question.

As I have noted --repeatedly -- the way I formulated the question does NOT lump libs together.

That is just your knee jerk reaction.

Typical lib.

actually, you totally ignored the substance of my response.

typical rightwinger.

now why don't you respond to that. :)
He ignored the substance of my post, also.

Who woulda figured? :lol:

When you post something of substance Synthia? We'll be shocked.
 
Me? I think you should ask your question in a way that doesn't lump "LIBS" together in one big homogenous blob....

i have mixed feelings about the issue.

but i'm leaning toward the view that if we don't like something we should change the channel.... and if enough people change the channel, he'll go away on his own. if not, he'll stay.

however, if he were propagandizing the mass murder of a group of people, would you think he should be off the air? and would you support pressuring his sponsors to stop sponsoring his hate show? or if he were encouraging a group of people to engage in terrorism??

i'm not saying this rises to the level of endorsing violence. but where would you draw the line?


As I have noted --repeatedly -- the way I formulated the question does NOT lump libs together.

That is just your knee jerk reaction.

Typical lib.

actually, you totally ignored the substance of my response.

typical rightwinger.

now why don't you respond to that. :)

As I did point out, thee is and was no substance to his post.

You libs should be able to admit it.

But you wont.
 
As I have noted --repeatedly -- the way I formulated the question does NOT lump libs together.

That is just your knee jerk reaction.

Typical lib.

actually, you totally ignored the substance of my response.

typical rightwinger.

now why don't you respond to that. :)
He ignored the substance of my post, also.

Who woulda figured? :lol:

False.

As you knew when you submitted the above quoted post, I had already directly responded to your substance-less post.
 
Media Matters is engaging in real life neg repping.

The op is engaging in neg rep whining.

Bullshit from Ravi. Stupid lying lair.

Attempting to silence the opposition is not remotely the same as a neg rep.

Ravi lies like that because she knows that the truth just exposes her "positions" more and as the trite nonsense they are.
 

Forum List

Back
Top