First redneck Baltimore cop trial begins

DigitalDrifter

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2013
47,536
25,849
2,605
Oregon
Time to make these rednecks pay for what they did to Freddie Gray!



Trial of Baltimore police officer charged in man's death to start

n">Trial begins on Monday for a Baltimore police officer charged in the death of a black man from an injury he suffered while in police custody that triggered rioting and protests and fueled a U.S. debate on police brutality.

Officer William Porter, 26, is the first of six officers scheduled for separate trials in Baltimore City Circuit Court for the death in April of Freddie Gray.

Trial will begin with jury selection. Judge Barry Williams last week ordered the identities of jurors to be shielded to keep them from facing outside pressure.

Gray, 25, died from a spinal injury suffered in the back of a police transport van after he was taken into custody. Porter is accused of ignoring Gray's requests for medical aid and not putting a seatbelt on him, even though he was shackled and handcuffed.

Porter faces charges of second-degree assault, manslaughter, misconduct in office and reckless endangerment. If convicted on all counts he could face more than 25 years in prison.

The other officers are charged with offenses ranging from second-degree murder for van driver Officer Caesar Goodson to misconduct.

Protests, rioting and looting flared in the largely black city after Gray's death, and National Guard troops were sent in and a curfew imposed to restore order. Gray's death added fuel to a national debate on police tactics and treatment of minorities.

Prosecutors have said they want Porter to testify first so they can use him as a potential witness against Goodson and Sergeant Alicia White.

Porter's lawyers have said in court papers that he was ready to testify in his own defense. Three of the six officers, including Porter, are black, and three are white.

David Jaros, a University of Baltimore associate law professor, said prosecutors face a tough challenge in convicting Porter and the other officers.

Police are normally reluctant to testify against other officers and judges and juries tend to acquit in misconduct cases, he said. Prosecutors also will have to show that a reasonable person would have tried to get Gray medical aid and that Porter failed to do so.

"I keep waiting for, if not a smoking gun, at least a warm weapon to reveal itself," he said.

Starting dates for the other trials are from Jan. 6 to March 9. Baltimore agreed in September to pay a $6.4 million civil settlement to Gray's family.

Trial of Baltimore police officer charged in man's death to start
 
A cop is a cop no matter what their skin color. I hope he gets what's coming to him.

What's coming to him ?

A not guilty verdict. Or dismissal of charges. This case is so fucked up and politically motivated....I'd say about a 2% chance he's convicted.

Then...of course...he won't cooperate and testify against other cops. Jurors for those trials will be swayed by this verdict...like it or not it's true.

And...Baltimore will burn. Again.
 
This is one trial that wont be cut and dry..

Oh I agree.

These arrests and trial were a reaction to riots and purely politically driven.

Should be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Yeah the death of a guy who was minding his own business has nothing to do with it :rolleyes:

You mean of a known drug dealer who ran from cops? On a street corner that the SAME prosecutor sent an email to a Lieutenant about cracking down on? The SAME Lt. she is now charging with murder for arresting a drug dealer on that very corner she ordered him onto? The drug dealer who has a history of trying to hurt himself to get lawsuit money....and a witness in the van who said he heard him smashing himself into the van wall?

Oh yeah....that one.


This is a medical negligence case AT BEST. And the Democrat witch hunters are trying to jail cops on murder over it?
 
This is one trial that wont be cut and dry..

Oh I agree.

These arrests and trial were a reaction to riots and purely politically driven.

Should be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Yeah the death of a guy who was minding his own business has nothing to do with it :rolleyes:

You mean of a known drug dealer who ran from cops? On a street corner that the SAME prosecutor sent an email to a Lieutenant about cracking down on? The SAME Lt. she is now charging with murder for arresting a drug dealer on that very corner she ordered him onto? The drug dealer who has a history of trying to hurt himself to get lawsuit money....and a witness in the van who said he heard him smashing himself into the van wall?

Oh yeah....that one.


This is a medical negligence case AT BEST. And the Democrat witch hunters are trying to jail cops on murder over it?
We'll see. The fact that it's gone to court instead of being swept under the rug and hushed up is already a victory.
 
This is one trial that wont be cut and dry..

Oh I agree.

These arrests and trial were a reaction to riots and purely politically driven.

Should be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Yeah the death of a guy who was minding his own business has nothing to do with it :rolleyes:

You mean of a known drug dealer who ran from cops? On a street corner that the SAME prosecutor sent an email to a Lieutenant about cracking down on? The SAME Lt. she is now charging with murder for arresting a drug dealer on that very corner she ordered him onto? The drug dealer who has a history of trying to hurt himself to get lawsuit money....and a witness in the van who said he heard him smashing himself into the van wall?

Oh yeah....that one.


This is a medical negligence case AT BEST. And the Democrat witch hunters are trying to jail cops on murder over it?
We'll see. The fact that it's gone to court instead of being swept under the rug and hushed up is already a victory.
that depends on what you call "victory". See, you, like BLM, are irrational, emotional knee-jerkers that never consider anything outside of the echo chamber.
 
And the first dominoe begins it's tilt....

fry em like bacon

2B36FBD800000578-3191305-image-m-10_1439137560073.jpg
 
This is one trial that wont be cut and dry..

Oh I agree.

These arrests and trial were a reaction to riots and purely politically driven.

Should be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Yeah the death of a guy who was minding his own business has nothing to do with it :rolleyes:

You mean of a known drug dealer who ran from cops? On a street corner that the SAME prosecutor sent an email to a Lieutenant about cracking down on? The SAME Lt. she is now charging with murder for arresting a drug dealer on that very corner she ordered him onto? The drug dealer who has a history of trying to hurt himself to get lawsuit money....and a witness in the van who said he heard him smashing himself into the van wall?

Oh yeah....that one.


This is a medical negligence case AT BEST. And the Democrat witch hunters are trying to jail cops on murder over it?
We'll see. The fact that it's gone to court instead of being swept under the rug and hushed up is already a victory.
that depends on what you call "victory". See, you, like BLM, are irrational, emotional knee-jerkers that never consider anything outside of the echo chamber.
Yeah it's not like accusations against police result in a charge at radically lower rates than the general populace. Or that when successfully charged they are convicted at a radically lower rate than the general populace. Or anything like that.

:rolleyes:
 
Oh I agree.

These arrests and trial were a reaction to riots and purely politically driven.

Should be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Yeah the death of a guy who was minding his own business has nothing to do with it :rolleyes:

You mean of a known drug dealer who ran from cops? On a street corner that the SAME prosecutor sent an email to a Lieutenant about cracking down on? The SAME Lt. she is now charging with murder for arresting a drug dealer on that very corner she ordered him onto? The drug dealer who has a history of trying to hurt himself to get lawsuit money....and a witness in the van who said he heard him smashing himself into the van wall?

Oh yeah....that one.


This is a medical negligence case AT BEST. And the Democrat witch hunters are trying to jail cops on murder over it?
We'll see. The fact that it's gone to court instead of being swept under the rug and hushed up is already a victory.
that depends on what you call "victory". See, you, like BLM, are irrational, emotional knee-jerkers that never consider anything outside of the echo chamber.
Yeah it's not like accusations against police result in a charge at radically lower rates than the general populace. Or that when successfully charged they are convicted at a radically lower rate than the general populace. Or anything like that.

:rolleyes:
I agree with your point. Too bad, you don't comprehend mine :(
 
Yeah the death of a guy who was minding his own business has nothing to do with it :rolleyes:

You mean of a known drug dealer who ran from cops? On a street corner that the SAME prosecutor sent an email to a Lieutenant about cracking down on? The SAME Lt. she is now charging with murder for arresting a drug dealer on that very corner she ordered him onto? The drug dealer who has a history of trying to hurt himself to get lawsuit money....and a witness in the van who said he heard him smashing himself into the van wall?

Oh yeah....that one.


This is a medical negligence case AT BEST. And the Democrat witch hunters are trying to jail cops on murder over it?
We'll see. The fact that it's gone to court instead of being swept under the rug and hushed up is already a victory.
that depends on what you call "victory". See, you, like BLM, are irrational, emotional knee-jerkers that never consider anything outside of the echo chamber.
Yeah it's not like accusations against police result in a charge at radically lower rates than the general populace. Or that when successfully charged they are convicted at a radically lower rate than the general populace. Or anything like that.

:rolleyes:
I agree with your point. Too bad, you don't comprehend mine :(
What that this officer could be innocent? Possibly. Maybe he did his job perfectly and Gray just magically died somehow.
 
You mean of a known drug dealer who ran from cops? On a street corner that the SAME prosecutor sent an email to a Lieutenant about cracking down on? The SAME Lt. she is now charging with murder for arresting a drug dealer on that very corner she ordered him onto? The drug dealer who has a history of trying to hurt himself to get lawsuit money....and a witness in the van who said he heard him smashing himself into the van wall?

Oh yeah....that one.


This is a medical negligence case AT BEST. And the Democrat witch hunters are trying to jail cops on murder over it?
We'll see. The fact that it's gone to court instead of being swept under the rug and hushed up is already a victory.
that depends on what you call "victory". See, you, like BLM, are irrational, emotional knee-jerkers that never consider anything outside of the echo chamber.
Yeah it's not like accusations against police result in a charge at radically lower rates than the general populace. Or that when successfully charged they are convicted at a radically lower rate than the general populace. Or anything like that.

:rolleyes:
I agree with your point. Too bad, you don't comprehend mine :(
What that this officer could be innocent? Possibly. Maybe he did his job perfectly and Gray just magically died somehow.
THIS is what I meant by the echo chamber...
 
Oh I agree.

These arrests and trial were a reaction to riots and purely politically driven.

Should be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Yeah the death of a guy who was minding his own business has nothing to do with it :rolleyes:

You mean of a known drug dealer who ran from cops? On a street corner that the SAME prosecutor sent an email to a Lieutenant about cracking down on? The SAME Lt. she is now charging with murder for arresting a drug dealer on that very corner she ordered him onto? The drug dealer who has a history of trying to hurt himself to get lawsuit money....and a witness in the van who said he heard him smashing himself into the van wall?

Oh yeah....that one.


This is a medical negligence case AT BEST. And the Democrat witch hunters are trying to jail cops on murder over it?
We'll see. The fact that it's gone to court instead of being swept under the rug and hushed up is already a victory.
that depends on what you call "victory". See, you, like BLM, are irrational, emotional knee-jerkers that never consider anything outside of the echo chamber.
Yeah it's not like accusations against police result in a charge at radically lower rates than the general populace. Or that when successfully charged they are convicted at a radically lower rate than the general populace. Or anything like that.

:rolleyes:

Police are given the authority to carry weapons and go enforce laws....which often involves detaining offenders and sometimes using force to do so.

The general public does not have that authority.

So....accusations against each are obviously very different. Courts know this. Jurors are shown the difference.

Liberals don't get that.
 
Yeah the death of a guy who was minding his own business has nothing to do with it :rolleyes:

You mean of a known drug dealer who ran from cops? On a street corner that the SAME prosecutor sent an email to a Lieutenant about cracking down on? The SAME Lt. she is now charging with murder for arresting a drug dealer on that very corner she ordered him onto? The drug dealer who has a history of trying to hurt himself to get lawsuit money....and a witness in the van who said he heard him smashing himself into the van wall?

Oh yeah....that one.


This is a medical negligence case AT BEST. And the Democrat witch hunters are trying to jail cops on murder over it?
We'll see. The fact that it's gone to court instead of being swept under the rug and hushed up is already a victory.
that depends on what you call "victory". See, you, like BLM, are irrational, emotional knee-jerkers that never consider anything outside of the echo chamber.
Yeah it's not like accusations against police result in a charge at radically lower rates than the general populace. Or that when successfully charged they are convicted at a radically lower rate than the general populace. Or anything like that.

:rolleyes:

Police are given the authority to carry weapons and go enforce laws....which often involves detaining offenders and sometimes using force to do so.

The general public does not have that authority.

So....accusations against each are obviously very different. Courts know this. Jurors are shown the difference.

Liberals don't get that.
Bucs from now on just post that police shouldn't be held to any standards. It's short and to the point.
 
I like the way they are holding different trials for each person. It guaruantees that all will be found not guilty since they cannot verify statements with the others.

If it was a conspiracy charge they'd be toast. But now when they say something happened all the defense has to say is that the other guy hasnt gone on trial yet so you cant include his statements.

Voila
 

Forum List

Back
Top