Fiorina TIES Trump 22/22 in first post-Debate No. 2 GOP nomination poll

[Statistikhengst]

Behold:

Gravis (R) / OAN, released 18.09.2015:
1,337 RRV, MoE = +/-3.0
The link will probably be defunct pretty quickly, OAN uses the same URL for all polling results and until now, I have not seen any archive links. For this reason, two screenshots.





Margin: TIE (Fiorina/Trump)

Also:







This is interesting not in that Gravis (R) is a good pollster. It is not. It has a mathematical bias that is FAR to the right, and OAN is a self-identified Conservative news outlet, with commentators like Sarah Palin on the payroll. It's interesting because the last OAN numbers saw Trump soaring in to the upper 30s and now, he has sunk to 22. That's a pretty steep dip, to say the least.

FYI.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Trump is being seen as a shitty debater and a idiot. I predict in a month he'll be third.

 

[Camp]

The poll is the beginning of what will be seen in the next few days, a dispelling of the nonsense vote for your favorite polls where goofy Trump supporters vote over and over to make it appear like he did great in the debate. Non scientific entertainment polls that mean less than nothing

 

[S.J.]

Hey look, Stat finds another obscure poll to engage his fantasy of Trump losing ground. LOL

 

[Statistikhengst]

Hey look, Stat finds another obscure poll to engage his fantasy of Trump losing ground. LOL

So, when Gravis (R) / OAN found Trump beating Clinton by 8 points 3 weeks ago, that was also an "obscure poll" too, right?
Thanks for admitting that Gravis is an unimportant Republican polling firm. I appreciate that.

This is what happens when silly Righties write BEFORE they think.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

There is really not that much od a difference between the Rude pundit The Rude Pundit: Random Observations on a Clusterfuck at the Reagan Library
Nobody lied more than Carly Fiorina. Nearly every fucking word out of her stupid fucking mouth was a fucking lie. She lied about what was in the Planned Parenthood videos. She lied about climate change. She lied about her record at Hewlett-Packard. She lied about the need for...fuck it, she just lied. But she lied with such confidence that everyone will mistake it for truth. So of course she's the winner of the debate.




and the The New York Times

The NYT take is below

Peel back the boasting and insults, the lies and exaggerations common to any presidential campaign. What remains is a collection of assertions so untrue, so bizarre, that they form a vision as surreal as the Ronald Reagan jet looming behind the candidates’ lecterns.

It felt at times as if the speakers were no longer living in a fact-based world where actions have consequences, programs take money and money has to come from somewhere. Where basic laws — like physics and the Constitution — constrain wishes. Where Congress and the public, allies and enemies, markets and militaries don’t just do what you want them to, just because you say they will.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Wait.

What happened to the GOP "War on Wimmenz!!!!!"?

Fiorina/Carson and Liberals have no choice but to go Lemming off the cliff

 

[S.J.]

So, when Gravis (R) / OAN found Trump beating Clinton by 8 points 3 weeks ago, that was also an "obscure poll" too, right?

Yep.

Thanks for admitting that Gravis is an unimportant Republican polling firm. I appreciate that.

You're welcome.

This is what happens when silly Righties write BEFORE they think.

No, it's what happens when hacks like you post insignificant polls out of desperation. You get called on it.