Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
South Carolina's instincts to join hands and not be racially divided was either just good morals, or paying attention...likely both...
Well first let's line up the facts we know so far:
1. Dylann Roof is almost certainly gay, certainly loves flag burning and big near-naked black dudes pumping iron on his shirt; and from all accounts, attempts to paint him out as a "conservative bigot" are falling flat on their face. If the cardboard cutout left narrative is to be believed, he should've been wearing an American flag t-shirt and burning the "Gold's Gym" logo instead..
2. Left media outlets (not necessarily either of the two quoted at the top) highly sympathetic to the a certain controversial movement's need to generate kneejerk "civil rights" support in the public, have also be oxygenating with a leaf-blower racial tensions since at least last year in order to tag their main pet "civil rights" cause onto a "wave of public racial/civil rights outrage/sympathy", generated in large part artificially. Certainly augmented artificially.. (Missouri, etc.)
3. Another Southern Christian church just announced the day before Roof's crime that they would not condone, nor participate in or facilitate gay marriage no matter what SCOTUS says.
4. Roof, likely homosexual, sat in a Bible study meeting the next day for an hour listening to the current topic of the day (maybe the Huge Christian announcement the day before?) and then gunned down 9 Christians who were also black.
5. Witnesses say he had intended to shoot up a predominantly white college instead.
6. Roof was about stirring up racial unrest, a racial civil war.
7. But so have a certain media outlets been up to exactly the same thing.
Here's what Roof's dapper young guy pal had to say about D. Roof's intentions about race and about the shooting venue changing:
Dylan Roof, is a "very soft-spoken, shy but keenly smart young man" according to his mother and friends. By all accounts, he was capable of taking it upon himself to multi task an Agenda he'd likely seen being played out on certain media outlets over the last year. If so, we have both a crime against blacks AND a crime against Christians. And if you take the rules about inciting civil unrest for nefarious reasons and the federal punishment for that, we may have a crime against the United States of America.
There will be umpteen responses to this thread asking you to ignore the reasons why this frail young intelligent, soft-spoken man with black and white pals both who swear he wasn't racist, might want to ramp up racial tensions. And I submit they may be in part payroll bloggers from certain media outlets I've been talking about...in damage control mode...
continued..
Well first let's line up the facts we know so far:
1. Dylann Roof is almost certainly gay, certainly loves flag burning and big near-naked black dudes pumping iron on his shirt; and from all accounts, attempts to paint him out as a "conservative bigot" are falling flat on their face. If the cardboard cutout left narrative is to be believed, he should've been wearing an American flag t-shirt and burning the "Gold's Gym" logo instead..
2. Left media outlets (not necessarily either of the two quoted at the top) highly sympathetic to the a certain controversial movement's need to generate kneejerk "civil rights" support in the public, have also be oxygenating with a leaf-blower racial tensions since at least last year in order to tag their main pet "civil rights" cause onto a "wave of public racial/civil rights outrage/sympathy", generated in large part artificially. Certainly augmented artificially.. (Missouri, etc.)
3. Another Southern Christian church just announced the day before Roof's crime that they would not condone, nor participate in or facilitate gay marriage no matter what SCOTUS says.
4. Roof, likely homosexual, sat in a Bible study meeting the next day for an hour listening to the current topic of the day (maybe the Huge Christian announcement the day before?) and then gunned down 9 Christians who were also black.
5. Witnesses say he had intended to shoot up a predominantly white college instead.
6. Roof was about stirring up racial unrest, a racial civil war.
7. But so have a certain media outlets been up to exactly the same thing.
Here's what Roof's dapper young guy pal had to say about D. Roof's intentions about race and about the shooting venue changing:
Dylan Roof, is a "very soft-spoken, shy but keenly smart young man" according to his mother and friends. By all accounts, he was capable of taking it upon himself to multi task an Agenda he'd likely seen being played out on certain media outlets over the last year. If so, we have both a crime against blacks AND a crime against Christians. And if you take the rules about inciting civil unrest for nefarious reasons and the federal punishment for that, we may have a crime against the United States of America.
There will be umpteen responses to this thread asking you to ignore the reasons why this frail young intelligent, soft-spoken man with black and white pals both who swear he wasn't racist, might want to ramp up racial tensions. And I submit they may be in part payroll bloggers from certain media outlets I've been talking about...in damage control mode...
Last edited:
Well, now you know.. THE MEDIA.
