Federalizing newspapers and killing blogs...

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Capitalist, May 29, 2010.

  1. Capitalist
    Offline

    Capitalist Jeffersonian Liberal

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    835
    Thanks Received:
    209
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +211
    Writing at Business Insider, Jeff Jarvis describes the next stage of the administration's systematic obliteration of the Constitution: federalizing newspapers and killing blogs. The Federal Trade Commission has posted its "potential policy recommendations to support the reinnvention of journalism", which is not only an unprecedented federal overreach, but truly a repudiation of the First Amendment itself.

    Consider what Jarvis calls 'the iPad tax' -- a 5% fee on all consumer electronics -- which is intended to raise $4 billion a year. That money would be spent on government-funded news.

    The Implications of Government-Funded News...

    ...are well nigh horrifying. Not only does the FTC propose "circling the wagons" around old media -- The New York Times, The Washington Post and the like -- the financial lifeline supplied by the federal government would also serve as a leash. If you thought old media was aligned with the mission of the Democrat Party before, just wait until it's dependent upon the feds for salaries and benefits.

    The FTC Suggests Killing Blogs to Bolster Newspapers...

    ...through a series of bizarre policy recommendations that are predicated upon the following conclusion:

    [N]ewspapers have not yet found a new, sustainable business model, and there is reason for concern that such a business model may not emerge. Therefore, it is not too soon to start considering policies that might encourage innovations to help support journalism into the future..

    By "journalism", the FTC means "newspapers" and by "encourage innovations" the FTC means stifle competition. Among the FTC's suggestions:

    • Tightly limit what search engines and news aggregators (like Drudge Report) are allowed to report;

    • Potentially define certain kinds of news reports as "proprietary facts" rather than events in the public domain;

    • Rather than protect consumers against price-fixing (one of its missions), the FTC rallies around antitrust exemptions for newspapers that could help them monopolize news distribution;

    • Redistributing wealth from individual taxpayers to old media, which would serve to bolster the coffers of newspapers while simultaneously reducing journalistic independence and truly creating a "state-run media".

    Sinister

    Jarvis concludes that the real problem with the FTC's position "is the alignment of the legacy institutions of media and government. Here, the internet is not the salvation of news, journalism, and democracy. It’s the other side."

    I think Jarvis is naive: this is nothing less than a sinister, diabolical effort to shred the First Amendment and create a state-run media complex designed to report only what the government wants reported.

    This is an utterly ominous development and one that should remind readers why this President embraces dictators like Hugo Chavez. He seems to envy the control that dictators exercise over their subjects.

    And he seeks to emulate them.
    directorblue dot blogspot dot com
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. syrenn
    Offline

    syrenn BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2010
    Messages:
    47,839
    Thanks Received:
    10,388
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +10,404
    just the words "government funded news"

    SCARES THE SHIT OUT OF ME!


    And before some of you get your panties in a bunch, that goes for both right and left governments.
     
  3. boedicca
    Offline

    boedicca Uppity Water Nymph Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    41,772
    Thanks Received:
    12,766
    Trophy Points:
    2,250
    Location:
    The Land of Funk
    Ratings:
    +22,719
    Why do you think the Financial Reform Bill includes the FTC provision that will enable them to kill blogs by eliminating advertising revenue?
     
  4. Baruch Menachem
    Offline

    Baruch Menachem '

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,204
    Thanks Received:
    3,235
    Trophy Points:
    185
    Ratings:
    +3,305
    A 4% tax is not news. It will bring constancy to the tax code on electronic communication. There has been a 3% tax on long distance telephone and telegraph since 1896.

    And democrats funding dying businesses is not news either. newspapers are dying partly because they are old tech, and partly because they have been serving their customers badly for nearly two generations.

    We have had government sponsored news since the 1960s. It does real badly in the ratings because it is badly done, but it has been on forever.


    It is odd that the government sponsored news program was the only one personality based, and the guys had the most boring personalities in news. Also bugged me that it was named for the two white guys and the black woman who did all the heavy lifting on the program was just a 'correspondent.'
     
  5. AmericanFirst
    Offline

    AmericanFirst Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    12,204
    Thanks Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +2,005
    This Admin wants to control the media because it does not like the american people to know the truth about what they are doing. They are wrong and they know it. They are socialist pigs.
     

Share This Page