Federal Judge Rejects GOP Challenge To Invalidate Nearly 127,000 Votes In Democratic-Leaning Houston

[Dana7360]

The federal judge just rejected the Texas gop lame attempt to disenfranchise over 127 thousand voters.

The republicans are losing in the courts in their attempts to cheat their way to a win in the election.

They can appeal and I wouldn't be surprised if they do but thus far, every court has ruled against the republicans.

Most drive-thru voting locations to close for Election Day in Houston-area county at center of legal drama

The Houston-area county at the center of a legal fight over drive-thru voting decided late Monday to close nine of the 10 polling places that the county had used as drive-thru voting locations.

www.cnn.com

 

[Auld Phart]

(I wonder how many more times I'm going to see this thread?)

 

[JustAGuy1]

Dems are doing their damndest to steal this election. In Pennsylvania Ballots do not have to have a Post Mark nor do the signatures have to match to the voter, I know...nothing to see there

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Dems are doing their damndest to steal this election. In Pennsylvania Balots do not have to have a Post Mark nor do the signatures have o match to the voter, I know...nothing to see there

That's OK

If they steal the election, no one will care.

The only possible uprising would be if Trump gets elected.

 

[toobfreak]

The federal judge just rejected the Texas gop lame attempt to disenfranchise over 127 thousand voters.

BIG DIFFERENCE between throwing out illegal unqualified votes and disenfranchising actual voters, son.

The first PREVENTS CHEATING.

 

[colfax_m]

Dems are doing their damndest to steal this election. In Pennsylvania Balots do not have to have a Post Mark nor do the signatures have o match to the voter, I know...nothing to see there

What does that have to do with the OP?

 

[colfax_m]

The first PREVENTS CHEATING.

There was no one saying that the votes that the republicans were trying to throw out were not from legal voters.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Dems are doing their damndest to steal this election. In Pennsylvania Balots do not have to have a Post Mark nor do the signatures have o match to the voter, I know...nothing to see there

What does that have to do with the OP?

Sue me.

 

[colfax_m]

Sue me.

This is a story about Republicans trying to get judges to toss out votes cast by legal voters in Texas.

Join me in denouncing this as deplorable and un-American.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Sue me.

This is a story about Republicans trying to get judges to toss out votes cast by legal voters in Texas.

Join me in denouncing this as deplorable and un-American.

So you don't care that Penn Dems are cheating?

 

[Obiwan]

If you listen to the broadcast, it seems to boil down to whether or not the Republicans that filed the suit have standing...

Since the judge ruled they didn't, find someone that does, refile, and get ready to head to the SCOTUS if necessary....

 

[Obiwan]

The first PREVENTS CHEATING.

There was no one saying that the votes that the republicans were trying to throw out were not from legal voters.

According to the news broadcast at the link, the issue seems to be whether the votes were actually collected in a building (as required by state law)....

Sorry, but if the votes were collected illegally, there are certainly grounds to toss them!!!!

 

[colfax_m]

So you don't care that Penn Dems are cheating?

I will when I see actual cheating.

 

[colfax_m]

According to the news broadcast at the link, the issue seems to be whether the votes were actually collected in a building (as required by state law)....

Looks good to me.

 

[JustAGuy1]

So you don't care that Penn Dems are cheating?

I will when I see actual cheating.

No you won't, all you care about is winning, you don't care how it happens. Now, had you read the source you'd have seen Penn is mentioned in the article.

 

[colfax_m]

No you won't, all you care about is winning, you don't care how it happens. Now, had you read the source you'd have seen Penn is mentioned in the article.

The right makes a LOT of allegations of cheating but it’s usually manufactured complaining. Like when Barr made a big splash about Trump votes being thrown away. The real story was far different than the headlines.

Accepting mail in votes after Election Day is not cheating.

 

[JustAGuy1]

No you won't, all you care about is winning, you don't care how it happens. Now, had you read the source you'd have seen Penn is mentioned in the article.

The right makes a LOT of allegations of cheating but it’s usually manufactured complaining. Like when Barr made a big splash about Trump votes being thrown away. The real story was far different than the headlines.

Accepting mail in votes after Election Day is not cheating.

LOL, is not requiring a valid postmark or not establishing that the signatures match the voter?

 

[colfax_m]

No you won't, all you care about is winning, you don't care how it happens. Now, had you read the source you'd have seen Penn is mentioned in the article.

The right makes a LOT of allegations of cheating but it’s usually manufactured complaining. Like when Barr made a big splash about Trump votes being thrown away. The real story was far different than the headlines.

Accepting mail in votes after Election Day is not cheating.

LOL, is not requiring a valid postmark or not establishing that the signatures match the voter?

Is it the voters fault if the envelope doesn’t have a postmark?

 

[Turtlesoup]

The federal judge just rejected the Texas gop lame attempt to disenfranchise over 127 thousand voters.

The republicans are losing in the courts in their attempts to cheat their way to a win in the election.

They can appeal and I wouldn't be surprised if they do but thus far, every court has ruled against the republicans.

Most drive-thru voting locations to close for Election Day in Houston-area county at center of legal drama

The Houston-area county at the center of a legal fight over drive-thru voting decided late Monday to close nine of the 10 polling places that the county had used as drive-thru voting locations.

www.cnn.com

They have already snagged DALLAS JONES of he BIDEN campaign along with his co-horts of cheating----------the votes will be dealt with immediately following the election as will the criminal charge.s. BTW, they are saying Biden fired Jones.

 

[JustAGuy1]

No you won't, all you care about is winning, you don't care how it happens. Now, had you read the source you'd have seen Penn is mentioned in the article.

The right makes a LOT of allegations of cheating but it’s usually manufactured complaining. Like when Barr made a big splash about Trump votes being thrown away. The real story was far different than the headlines.

Accepting mail in votes after Election Day is not cheating.

LOL, is not requiring a valid postmark or not establishing that the signatures match the voter?

Is it the voters fault if the envelope doesn’t have a postmark?

Like I said, you don't care HOW you win, just so you win. Progs have NO integrity or ethics. None.