iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,919
- 1,600
i think we're a ways from passing legislation. what are you afraid you're about to lose? engraved bump stocks?You object to passing legislation only after the facts are known?well as long as no one is getting ahead of themselves here, great.Because those investigating are doing a public service. Now I realize the investigation is still ongoing, but... If our public officials cannot share with us the details of what happened; they certainly shouldn't be allowed to change laws prompted by this incident until they do. Only in that way can we the people determine if our public servants are acting in our best interest, and with our consent.Well, knowing the contents of the note he reportedly left behind would go a long way toward dipelling speculation. If he was a one off; and not part of something bigger, or deeper; then it's over. And there's no reason not to tell the public what it says...like the whole FOURTH FLOOR SHOOTER who somehow shot through glass w/o breaking it but wait, they did break it only they cleaned it up quick to hide it, no wait...
a lot of this may turn out to be true. i just don't see a need to pre-determine what I think it should be cause that in turn usually has people then forcing "evidence" to show them correct. if not, well they're hiding things...
maybe. or they can tell everyone what it is out of context for the rest of the story and people can make it fit their own agenda.
not sure why people think we have a right to see crime scene evidence.
just wow.