Fascism and Progressives: An Intimate Relationship

Let's see... wrong... wrong.... wrong... conditionally right.... unknown. Not too good.

Hitler ascended to power of a party that already called itself "socialist" in its name -- a term he (Hitler) accepted with objection. He was no socialist. But the term itself was a relatively new and trendy term at the time with marketing power. You know, like "libertarian" has become today. These things go in swings. But while his party may have had governmentally socialist tenets in principle, he was socially firmly on the right, if not off-the-scale right.



"It is theorized" huh...

(remainder of link from Loonybird.com dismissed)

ROFL! So they called themselves socialists, they said they were socialists, they adopted all the same agenda planks as other socialist parties, but you just know they weren't socialist?

Do you ever wonder why you hear people smirking when you post this crap?

So modern day Germany is still under Nazi rule?

Jesus Christ the shit you people say, I don't know how you live with yourselves.

Holy Shit ! The crap you people post is unbeleivable -I don't know how you can look at yourselves in the Mirror without busting out in laughter ! But please don't stop - you're fuzzy logic and convoluted semantic contortions are great entertainment :D
 
Last edited:
Teddy Roosevelt was the first Progressive President. Woodrow Wilson was a statist, a war mongering racist.

The President can't direct the IRS. The NSA survailence apparatus has had bipartisan support from both houses of congress. The murderous Nazi regime of Hitler was textbook fascism. Neither party resembles them.

WND? Really?

Neither party resembles them?

The Nazi Party were socialists and demanded mandated health care for all. The Nazi's were environmentalists, creating the first national park in Europe and restricting hunting on certain endangered species and halted the construction of a damn on the Rhine and had their soldiers plant trees. The Nazis also gave PETA a run for their money, creating the harshest laws against mistreatment of animals and sending violators to the Russian front. Spending was also out of control. It was so bad that Hitler forbad the government from passing budgets in 1938. Economist Keynes, the progressive economic guru, once said that Hitler proved his economic theories to be correct, even before he had a chance to finish writing them. He added that his theories were best implemented by a dictatorship than an economy based in free trade.

Hitler railed against capitalism citing it was a Jewish economic scheme and also championed gun control.

As for genocide, the Nazi war machine targeted Jews because they were an easy target. Jews often were better off financially and had a long history of Europe of persecution. They then rounded them up, took their wealth, and sent them away to die. Then the Nazi's would plunder the nations they invaded as they created banks and currency to loot stores and the entire economy of the nations they conquered. The Nazi's then told these captive governments to round up the Jews, take their wealth, and save their respective economies. The Jewish genocide was nothing short of a money making scheme.

Today, some 50 million plus aborted babies, women around the US still have abortions because they want to avoid economic hardship. Funny how some things never change. It's still all about money.

As for military conquest, the US has troops in over 70 countries around the world. Hitler never came close to that type of world control.

Progressive leaders depend upon a stupid, docile base.

Yes ! Correct - "Stupid" -as in willfully ignorant and thoroughly brainwashed by a blatant Orwellian Progressive Media Machine.

docile ? - Docile implies laid back and non aggressive, It's the conservatives who've been too docile in letting this shit take hold , unfortunately the docile ones are the poorly organized right wing in their failures to preserve , protect and defend their [our] liberties, freedom and way of life.
 
Last edited:
Let's see... wrong... wrong.... wrong... conditionally right.... unknown. Not too good.

Hitler ascended to power of a party that already called itself "socialist" in its name -- a term he (Hitler) accepted with objection. He was no socialist. But the term itself was a relatively new and trendy term at the time with marketing power. You know, like "libertarian" has become today. These things go in swings. But while his party may have had governmentally socialist tenets in principle, he was socially firmly on the right, if not off-the-scale right.



"It is theorized" huh...

(remainder of link from Loonybird.com dismissed)

ROFL! So they called themselves socialists, they said they were socialists, they adopted all the same agenda planks as other socialist parties, but you just know they weren't socialist?

Do you ever wonder why you hear people smirking when you post this crap?

So modern day Germany is still under Nazi rule?

Jesus Christ the shit you people say, I don't know how you live with yourselves.

It's not ruled by the Nazi party, but it's still under a similar economic system. So is the United States, for that matter. We also adopted fascism prior to WW II.
 
ROFL! So they called themselves socialists, they said they were socialists, they adopted all the same agenda planks as other socialist parties, but you just know they weren't socialist?

Do you ever wonder why you hear people smirking when you post this crap?

So modern day Germany is still under Nazi rule?

Jesus Christ the shit you people say, I don't know how you live with yourselves.

It's not ruled by the Nazi party, but it's still under a similar economic system. So is the United States, for that matter. We also adopted fascism prior to WW II.

To a certain extent -this is somewhat correct -there are elements of fascism that were slipped into the American System before and since WWII . And there are many more elements being rammed through in recent years - FRom the Clinton Regime till the present tyrant Except they have relabeled it as socialism , affirmative action, gay rights - modern fascists /socialists/progressives / Liberals [Socio-Fascists] are masters of marketing and skillful engineers of oxymoronic semantics .
 
Last edited:
The far right, libertarians, and anarchists simply do not want to engage the realities of the 21st century
 
YUP.

Amazed that I am for once agreeing with PC?

The yoke of crypto-fascism really got put on our backs during WWI and the Wilson Admin.

We got the FED, too.

Although I still think WILSON was not entirely aware of what he was doing (as it regards the FED) he is not innocent of the crimes against our civil liberties that are still effecting this nation to this day.
 
The far right, libertarians, and anarchists simply do not want to engage the realities of the 21st century

The far left /soci-fascists simply wish to alter the realities of the 21st Century, and replace them with a Brave New World. If they have their way we'll being living peacefully on an Animal Farm with our Big Brother. Heck if they'd had their way this would have happenned way back in 1984
 
“Rob Schneider Tells Chris Stigall: We Are Sliding Very Fast Towards Fascism

Democracies don’t end well. We are sliding very fast towards fascism. It’s an ugly kind of thing. There’s this kind of mob mentality that we have to be careful of,” he said.

He believes comedians are pressured toward one side of the political spectrum.

“There’s a polarization that’s happening…I do think you look can look at government and go, ‘Wow, it is out of control now,’ and if you do criticize or tend to be not directly along a liberal stand, you can get murdered,” Schneider commented."
Rob Schneider Tells Chris Stigall: We Are Sliding Very Fast Towards Fascism « CBS Philly


Some Liberals are opening their eyes.
 
Teddy Roosevelt was the first Progressive President. Woodrow Wilson was a statist, a war mongering racist.

The President can't direct the IRS. The NSA survailence apparatus has had bipartisan support from both houses of congress. The murderous Nazi regime of Hitler was textbook fascism. Neither party resembles them.

WND? Really?

Neither party resembles them?

The Nazi Party were socialists and demanded mandated health care for all. The Nazi's were environmentalists, creating the first national park in Europe and restricting hunting on certain endangered species and halted the construction of a damn on the Rhine and had their soldiers plant trees. The Nazis also gave PETA a run for their money, creating the harshest laws against mistreatment of animals and sending violators to the Russian front. Spending was also out of control. It was so bad that Hitler forbad the government from passing budgets in 1938. Economist Keynes, the progressive economic guru, once said that Hitler proved his economic theories to be correct, even before he had a chance to finish writing them. He added that his theories were best implemented by a dictatorship than an economy based in free trade.

Hitler railed against capitalism citing it was a Jewish economic scheme and also championed gun control.

As for genocide, the Nazi war machine targeted Jews because they were an easy target. Jews often were better off financially and had a long history of Europe of persecution. They then rounded them up, took their wealth, and sent them away to die. Then the Nazi's would plunder the nations they invaded as they created banks and currency to loot stores and the entire economy of the nations they conquered. The Nazi's then told these captive governments to round up the Jews, take their wealth, and save their respective economies. The Jewish genocide was nothing short of a money making scheme.

Today, some 50 million plus aborted babies, women around the US still have abortions because they want to avoid economic hardship. Funny how some things never change. It's still all about money.

As for military conquest, the US has troops in over 70 countries around the world. Hitler never came close to that type of world control.

Abortion was outlawed in Nazi Germany.

And killling Jews is outlawed in Progressive America.

What is your point?
 
Neither party resembles them?

The Nazi Party were socialists and demanded mandated health care for all. The Nazi's were environmentalists, creating the first national park in Europe and restricting hunting on certain endangered species and halted the construction of a damn on the Rhine and had their soldiers plant trees. The Nazis also gave PETA a run for their money, creating the harshest laws against mistreatment of animals and sending violators to the Russian front. Spending was also out of control. It was so bad that Hitler forbad the government from passing budgets in 1938. Economist Keynes, the progressive economic guru, once said that Hitler proved his economic theories to be correct, even before he had a chance to finish writing them. He added that his theories were best implemented by a dictatorship than an economy based in free trade.

Hitler railed against capitalism citing it was a Jewish economic scheme and also championed gun control.

As for genocide, the Nazi war machine targeted Jews because they were an easy target. Jews often were better off financially and had a long history of Europe of persecution. They then rounded them up, took their wealth, and sent them away to die. Then the Nazi's would plunder the nations they invaded as they created banks and currency to loot stores and the entire economy of the nations they conquered. The Nazi's then told these captive governments to round up the Jews, take their wealth, and save their respective economies. The Jewish genocide was nothing short of a money making scheme.

Today, some 50 million plus aborted babies, women around the US still have abortions because they want to avoid economic hardship. Funny how some things never change. It's still all about money.

As for military conquest, the US has troops in over 70 countries around the world. Hitler never came close to that type of world control.

Abortion was outlawed in Nazi Germany.

And killling Jews is outlawed in Progressive America.

What is your point?

That can easily change. It was outlawed in Germany until 1933.
 
That is unless we're talking about Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis or any other citizen of the confederacy, eh Pogo?

Uh.... what?
Why would they be different? I don't get it.

Are you under the impression I'm from the South or something? :dunno:

All your Komrades in here think Lee and Davis should have been strung up, that a public university named after Lee should condemn him for owning slaves before the war, yet you think Wilson should be given a pass because mores were different in his day.

I'm not surprise you don't see the incongruity.

Umm.... where in the blue fuck have I posted anything resembling any of the above elements, ever? Where have I ever posted about Lee or Davis at all?
Wilson, I have posted about. Now what part of "world class racist asshole" can be somehow interpreted as "giving him a pass"? Are ya fuckin' stoopid?

What color were those mushrooms? :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
You keep saying Hitler wasn't a socialist and all the Nazi rhetoric was just a ruse, yet you continually fail to offer any evidence that he was a supporter of capitalism.

I didn't even bring up capitalism, dumbass.

What the fuck kind of island do you live on, where everything is black and white?

Your denial implied as such.

Is your name "Bripat"? I realize you both count as "dumbass" but try to read the quote byline.... duh.
 
You keep saying Hitler wasn't a socialist and all the Nazi rhetoric was just a ruse, yet you continually fail to offer any evidence that he was a supporter of capitalism.

I didn't even bring up capitalism, dumbass.

What the fuck kind of island do you live on, where everything is black and white?

You claim Hitler wasn't a socialist. Then what was he? What is this third thing that isn't capitalism but is yet "right-wing?"

Such a simpleton - you actually believe the entire world is classified into either "capitalism" or "communism", end of story.

You're not even worth the time to explain. Go get an education.
 
Teddy Roosevelt was the first Progressive President. Woodrow Wilson was a statist, a war mongering racist.

The President can't direct the IRS. The NSA survailence apparatus has had bipartisan support from both houses of congress. The murderous Nazi regime of Hitler was textbook fascism. Neither party resembles them.

WND? Really?

Neither party resembles them?

The Nazi Party were socialists and demanded mandated health care for all. The Nazi's were environmentalists, creating the first national park in Europe and restricting hunting on certain endangered species and halted the construction of a damn on the Rhine and had their soldiers plant trees. The Nazis also gave PETA a run for their money, creating the harshest laws against mistreatment of animals and sending violators to the Russian front. Spending was also out of control. It was so bad that Hitler forbad the government from passing budgets in 1938. Economist Keynes, the progressive economic guru, once said that Hitler proved his economic theories to be correct, even before he had a chance to finish writing them. He added that his theories were best implemented by a dictatorship than an economy based in free trade.

Hitler railed against capitalism citing it was a Jewish economic scheme and also championed gun control.

As for genocide, the Nazi war machine targeted Jews because they were an easy target. Jews often were better off financially and had a long history of Europe of persecution. They then rounded them up, took their wealth, and sent them away to die. Then the Nazi's would plunder the nations they invaded as they created banks and currency to loot stores and the entire economy of the nations they conquered. The Nazi's then told these captive governments to round up the Jews, take their wealth, and save their respective economies. The Jewish genocide was nothing short of a money making scheme.

Today, some 50 million plus aborted babies, women around the US still have abortions because they want to avoid economic hardship. Funny how some things never change. It's still all about money.

As for military conquest, the US has troops in over 70 countries around the world. Hitler never came close to that type of world control.

Abortion was outlawed in Nazi Germany.

And Germany had started passing national health care laws before Hitler was even born. So much for reliable sources. :rolleyes:
 
I didn't even bring up capitalism, dumbass.

What the fuck kind of island do you live on, where everything is black and white?

Your denial implied as such.

Is your name "Bripat"? I realize you both count as "dumbass" but try to read the quote byline.... duh.

You still haven't made anything resembling a credible case - you lose [Again] - bye bye
 

Forum List

Back
Top