- Dec 4, 2013
- 5,403
- 606
- 155
Let's see... wrong... wrong.... wrong... conditionally right.... unknown. Not too good.
Hitler ascended to power of a party that already called itself "socialist" in its name -- a term he (Hitler) accepted with objection. He was no socialist. But the term itself was a relatively new and trendy term at the time with marketing power. You know, like "libertarian" has become today. These things go in swings. But while his party may have had governmentally socialist tenets in principle, he was socially firmly on the right, if not off-the-scale right.
"It is theorized" huh...
(remainder of link from Loonybird.com dismissed)
ROFL! So they called themselves socialists, they said they were socialists, they adopted all the same agenda planks as other socialist parties, but you just know they weren't socialist?
Do you ever wonder why you hear people smirking when you post this crap?
So modern day Germany is still under Nazi rule?
Jesus Christ the shit you people say, I don't know how you live with yourselves.
Holy Shit ! The crap you people post is unbeleivable -I don't know how you can look at yourselves in the Mirror without busting out in laughter ! But please don't stop - you're fuzzy logic and convoluted semantic contortions are great entertainment
Last edited: