facebook killer, killed himself

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

JQ Public. .the link I provided explains what I am saying to you about Othello being 'black'. It gives you the historical context.

That is just one man's opinion. Since many moors have black skin it is silly to not recognize that the range of skin tones among them is as varied as those of Blacks in America.

Skin tone range isn't the important part anyway. The fact is that the Moors were considered to be the same as Turks and Arabs to the Europeans of the time. You can even find painting from the time, and they do depict varying skin tones of Moors, and even actual subsaharan negroes...but the features of the negroes are depicted different than the Moors.

But the pictures could be viewed another way. Perhaps the Moors depicted are the Blacks and the lighter folks are their slaves.

No. That's not correct. The blacks are the slaves....as they had always been wherever they were outside of subsaharan Africa. Heck...they still enslave each other in parts of subsaharan Africa.

So I guess we have to agree to disagree.

Guess so. But this isn't a matter of simple disagreement. You are taking a revisionist view that can easily be proven false.

 

[JQPublic1]

That is just one man's opinion. Since many moors have black skin it is silly to not recognize that the range of skin tones among them is as varied as those of Blacks in America.

Skin tone range isn't the important part anyway. The fact is that the Moors were considered to be the same as Turks and Arabs to the Europeans of the time. You can even find painting from the time, and they do depict varying skin tones of Moors, and even actual subsaharan negroes...but the features of the negroes are depicted different than the Moors.

But the pictures could be viewed another way. Perhaps the Moors depicted are the Blacks and the lighter folks are their slaves.

No. That's not correct. The blacks are the slaves....as they had always been wherever they were outside of subsaharan Africa. Heck...they still enslave each other in parts of subsaharan Africa.

So I guess we have to agree to disagree.

Guess so. But this isn't a matter of simple disagreement. You are taking a revisionist view that can easily be proven false.

That is just one man's opinion. Since many moors have black skin it is silly to not recognize that the range of skin tones among them is as varied as those of Blacks in America.

Skin tone range isn't the important part anyway. The fact is that the Moors were considered to be the same as Turks and Arabs to the Europeans of the time. You can even find painting from the time, and they do depict varying skin tones of Moors, and even actual subsaharan negroes...but the features of the negroes are depicted different than the Moors.

But the pictures could be viewed another way. Perhaps the Moors depicted are the Blacks and the lighter folks are their slaves.

No. That's not correct. The blacks are the slaves....as they had always been wherever they were outside of subsaharan Africa. Heck...they still enslave each other in parts of subsaharan Africa.

So I guess we have to agree to disagree.

Guess so. But this isn't a matter of simple disagreement. You are taking a revisionist view that can easily be proven false.

The revisions occured when the Greeks usurped the legacy of KMT (medu neter meaning land of the Blacks.) .and, during the decline of that great African civilization,took credit for all they were taught there...to include the language of science...mathematics. Europeans are the revisionist historians who, invented race and all the divisiveness and social stratification accompanying it. Even Chritianity was not spared as images of God and Jesus sculpted or graven in the likeness of iconic whiteness
whereas fair skin, blue eyes, and blonde hair
was made synonymous with divine causality.. If White men could create the notion that God and Jesus looked like them..the power intrinsic to that belief could be an invaluable tool to subjugate the darker people of the world. That strategy worked far beyond expectations. But that wasn't good enough. The complete destruction of Black history was necessary to not only justify slavery, but to secure the revisionist history making Whites the originators of all knowledge by the grace of their white god. Totally false...