Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars - The Melting Ice Sheet

Procrustes Stretched

And you say, "Oh my God, am I here all alone?"
Dec 1, 2008
60,271
7,487
1,840
Positively 4th Street
Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars - The Melting Ice Sheet

What's going on?

http://graphics.latimes.com/exxon-arctic/

Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars

What's going on?


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/30/world/united-states-russia-arctic-exploration.html

Has Corporate America been falling behind? Or has the US Government since the 1980s not been hard enough on developing plans for the Arctic?

Between 1986 and 1992, Croasdale’s team looked at both the positive and negative effects that a warming Arctic would have on oil operations, reporting its findings to Exxon headquarters in Houston and New Jersey.


The good news for Exxon, he told an audience of academics and government researchers in 1992, was that “potential global warming can only help lower exploration and development costs” in the Beaufort Sea.


---

In 2012, with great fanfare, China sent a refurbished icebreaker, the Xuelong, or Snow Dragon, across one such route. Signaling its ambitions to be a “polar expedition power,” China is now building a second icebreaker, giving it an icebreaking fleet equal to America’s. Russia, by far the largest Arctic nation, has 41 in all.

“The United States really isn’t even in this game,” Admiral Zukunft said at a conference in Washington this year.

He lamented the lack of urgency in Washington, contrasting it with the challenges of the Cold War, when the United States and the Soviet Union confronted each other in the Arctic and beyond. “When Russia put Sputnik in outer space, did we sit with our hands in pocket with great fascination and say, ‘Good for Mother Russia’?”
Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars

What's going on?


are ideologically motivated citizens helping to kill American opportunities (some would say exceptionalism) in the near future?

Obama Frets Over Melting Ice While Putin Claims The Arctic


Even the Council on Foreign Relations has something to say about it

In the twenty-first century, many experts believe that climate change, technological advances, and rising global demand for resources may at last unlock the considerable economic potential of the Circumpolar North. The melting of Arctic sea ice to record lows in recent years has prompted many nations, principally those with Arctic Ocean coastlines—the United States, Canada, Russia, Norway, and Denmark (Greenland)—to reassess their commitments and interests in the icy reaches atop the globe.

Many forecast Arctic summers will be free of ice in a matter of decades, potentially opening the region up to hundreds of billions of dollars in investment, including energy production, shipping, and fishing. The thaw will also pose new security demands as greater human activity induces states to increase their military and constabulary presence. While most experts dismiss the prospects for armed aggression in the Arctic, some defense analysts and academics assert that territorial disputes and a competition for resources have primed the Arctic for a new Cold War.


http://www.cfr.org/arctic/emerging-arctic/p32620#!/
 
from 2012

http://www.economist.com/node/21556798

Special report: The Arctic
The melting north
The Arctic is warming twice as fast as the rest of the planet, says James Astill. The retreating ice offers access to precious minerals and new sea lanes—but also carries grave dangers
Jun 16th 2012 | From the print edition

Depends on how hot or cold it gets.

Arctic sea ice volume increased by more than a quarter after the summers of 2013 and 2014 as a result of unusually cool temperatures, a deviation from the general downward trend of ice levels, according to new research published in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Arctic Sea Ice Rebounded—But the Melting Hasn't Stopped

How are those snow free winters in Europe going??

Greg
 
How many American corporations involved in oil exploration are spending money on researching global warming and it's potential effects on exploration?

I wonder. If corporations did not believe in global warming, why would they bother spending money? How would that help US companies beat the Russians and Chinese and others in oil exploration if the Arctic?
 
Last edited:
I would think the environmentalists who are so-called lefties would be denying climate change science in order to keep corporations out of the Arctic

The Emerging Arctic

Meanwhile, environmentalists are concerned that a new era of Arctic exploration and development could spoil one of the planet’s last great frontiers, a pristine habitat home to iconic wildlife and native communities that have subsisted there for thousands of years. Climatologists warn that the extraction of Arctic fossil fuels will contribute to global warming at a time when they believe nations should be paring back greenhouse-gas emissions and pursuing alternative energy sources.


http://www.cfr.org/arctic/emerging-arctic/p32620#!/
-
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher. Each of these functions make CFR an indispensable resource in a complex world.

 
Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars - The Melting Ice Sheet

What's going on?

http://graphics.latimes.com/exxon-arctic/

Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars

What's going on?


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/30/world/united-states-russia-arctic-exploration.html

Has Corporate America been falling behind? Or has the US Government since the 1980s not been hard enough on developing plans for the Arctic?

Between 1986 and 1992, Croasdale’s team looked at both the positive and negative effects that a warming Arctic would have on oil operations, reporting its findings to Exxon headquarters in Houston and New Jersey.


The good news for Exxon, he told an audience of academics and government researchers in 1992, was that “potential global warming can only help lower exploration and development costs” in the Beaufort Sea.


---

In 2012, with great fanfare, China sent a refurbished icebreaker, the Xuelong, or Snow Dragon, across one such route. Signaling its ambitions to be a “polar expedition power,” China is now building a second icebreaker, giving it an icebreaking fleet equal to America’s. Russia, by far the largest Arctic nation, has 41 in all.

“The United States really isn’t even in this game,” Admiral Zukunft said at a conference in Washington this year.

He lamented the lack of urgency in Washington, contrasting it with the challenges of the Cold War, when the United States and the Soviet Union confronted each other in the Arctic and beyond. “When Russia put Sputnik in outer space, did we sit with our hands in pocket with great fascination and say, ‘Good for Mother Russia’?”
Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars

What's going on?


are ideologically motivated citizens helping to kill American opportunities (some would say exceptionalism) in the near future?

Obama Frets Over Melting Ice While Putin Claims The Arctic


Even the Council on Foreign Relations has something to say about it

In the twenty-first century, many experts believe that climate change, technological advances, and rising global demand for resources may at last unlock the considerable economic potential of the Circumpolar North. The melting of Arctic sea ice to record lows in recent years has prompted many nations, principally those with Arctic Ocean coastlines—the United States, Canada, Russia, Norway, and Denmark (Greenland)—to reassess their commitments and interests in the icy reaches atop the globe.

Many forecast Arctic summers will be free of ice in a matter of decades, potentially opening the region up to hundreds of billions of dollars in investment, including energy production, shipping, and fishing. The thaw will also pose new security demands as greater human activity induces states to increase their military and constabulary presence. While most experts dismiss the prospects for armed aggression in the Arctic, some defense analysts and academics assert that territorial disputes and a competition for resources have primed the Arctic for a new Cold War.


http://www.cfr.org/arctic/emerging-arctic/p32620#!/

Yet the far left uses far left blog sites for their "facts"

Here is a sample of empirical evidence..

CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013.png


Learn how to follow empirical evidence versus AGW propaganda..
 
I would think the environmentalists who are so-called lefties would be denying climate change science in order to keep corporations out of the Arctic

The Emerging Arctic

Meanwhile, environmentalists are concerned that a new era of Arctic exploration and development could spoil one of the planet’s last great frontiers, a pristine habitat home to iconic wildlife and native communities that have subsisted there for thousands of years. Climatologists warn that the extraction of Arctic fossil fuels will contribute to global warming at a time when they believe nations should be paring back greenhouse-gas emissions and pursuing alternative energy sources.


http://www.cfr.org/arctic/emerging-arctic/p32620#!/
-
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher. Each of these functions make CFR an indispensable resource in a complex world.


"Death to America" trumps that, Dants; you KNOW that!!

Greg
 
How many American corporations involved in oil exploration are spending money on researching global warming and it's potential effects on exploration?

I wonder. If corporations did not believe in global warming, why would they bother spending money? How would that help US companies beat the Russians and Chinese and others in oil exploration if the Arctic?

You wonder?? So you don't KNOW!! Of course not. I wonder how much the Russkies will lose??

Greg
 
Yet the far left uses far left blog sites for their "facts"

...

Learn how to follow empirical evidence versus AGW propaganda..

Why are US oil companies and others spending so much money since teh 1980s researching the potential effects of global warming on oil exploration? Why would they keep spending money 30 years later?

http://graphics.latimes.com/exxon-arctic/

The company hired Stephen Lonergan, a Canadian geographer from McMaster University, to study the effect of climate change there. Lonergan used several climate models in his analysis, including the NASA model. They all concluded that things would get warmer and wetter and that those effects “cannot be ignored,” he said in his report.

As a result, the company should expect “maintenance and repair costs to roads, pipelines and other engineering structures” to be sizable in the future, he wrote. A warmer Arctic would threaten the stability of permafrost, he noted, potentially damaging the buildings, processing plants and pipelines that were built on the solid, frozen ground.

In addition, the company should expect more flooding along its riverside facilities, an earlier spring breakup of the ice pack, and more-severe summer storms. But it was the increased variability and unpredictability of the weather that was going to be the company’s biggest challenge, he said.​
 
from 2012

http://www.economist.com/node/21556798

Special report: The Arctic
The melting north
The Arctic is warming twice as fast as the rest of the planet, says James Astill. The retreating ice offers access to precious minerals and new sea lanes—but also carries grave dangers
Jun 16th 2012 | From the print edition





Wow! Only three years old! Good job silly boy! Here's what it was like today...\\Look at that. Still within the 20 year average. To hear idiots like you tell it the North Pole is open ocean. Oh yeah, have you seen the reports about that "open northwest passage"?

Well, it seems it ain't as nice as they claim... Who knew!



N_stddev_timeseries.png




Abstract
Recently, the feasibility of commercial shipping in the ice-prone Northwest Passage (NWP) has attracted a lot of attention. However, very little ice thickness information actually exists. We present results of the first ever airborne electromagnetic ice thickness surveys over the NWP carried out in April and May 2011 and 2015 over first-year and multiyear ice. These show modal thicknesses between 1.8 and 2.0 m in all regions. Mean thicknesses over 3 m and thick, deformed ice were observed over some multiyear ice regimes shown to originate from the Arctic Ocean. Thick ice features more than 100 m wide and thicker than 4 m occurred frequently. Results indicate that even in today's climate, ice conditions must still be considered severe. These results have important implications for the prediction of ice breakup and summer ice conditions, and the assessment of sea ice hazards during the summer shipping season.

Ice thickness in the Northwest Passage - Haas - 2015 - Geophysical Research Letters - Wiley Online Library
 
If Exxon had only hired westwall back when they started spending money on the potential effects of global warming back in the 1980s, they could have saves beau coupe cash

Today, as Exxon’s scientists predicted 25 years ago, Canada’s Northwest Territories has experienced some of the most dramatic effects of global warming. While the rest of the planet has seen an average increase of roughly 1.5 degrees in the last 100 years, the northern reaches of the province have warmed by 5.4 degrees and temperatures in central regions have increased by 3.6 degrees.

Since 2012, Exxon Mobil and Imperial have held the rights to more than 1 million acres in the Beaufort Sea, for which they bid $1.7 billion in a joint venture with BP. Although the companies have not begun drilling, they requested a lease extension until 2028 from the Canadian government a few months ago. Exxon Mobil declined to comment on its plans there.

Croasdale said the company could be “taking a gamble” the ice will break up soon, finally bringing about the day he predicted so long ago — when the costs would become low enough to make Arctic exploration economical.

http://graphics.latimes.com/exxon-arctic/
 
What is it with these amateur climate scientists like westwall and their graphs and images as if they actually know what they are talking about and funnier -- as if they are actually qualified to debate the climate science?

Then they try to engage people into tit for tats with dueling images and graphs?

Dante has consistently stated he does not play a climate scientist on the web or in real life. Dante not only bets on the fastest horse, the scientific consensus, but he bets that no matter what, the poor demented denier types will go to their graves insisting it's all been a global conspiracy that is anti-American ignoring it is American companies that have been on board for decades
 
Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars - The Melting Ice Sheet

What's going on?

http://graphics.latimes.com/exxon-arctic/

Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars

What's going on?


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/30/world/united-states-russia-arctic-exploration.html

Has Corporate America been falling behind? Or has the US Government since the 1980s not been hard enough on developing plans for the Arctic?

Between 1986 and 1992, Croasdale’s team looked at both the positive and negative effects that a warming Arctic would have on oil operations, reporting its findings to Exxon headquarters in Houston and New Jersey.


The good news for Exxon, he told an audience of academics and government researchers in 1992, was that “potential global warming can only help lower exploration and development costs” in the Beaufort Sea.


---

In 2012, with great fanfare, China sent a refurbished icebreaker, the Xuelong, or Snow Dragon, across one such route. Signaling its ambitions to be a “polar expedition power,” China is now building a second icebreaker, giving it an icebreaking fleet equal to America’s. Russia, by far the largest Arctic nation, has 41 in all.

“The United States really isn’t even in this game,” Admiral Zukunft said at a conference in Washington this year.

He lamented the lack of urgency in Washington, contrasting it with the challenges of the Cold War, when the United States and the Soviet Union confronted each other in the Arctic and beyond. “When Russia put Sputnik in outer space, did we sit with our hands in pocket with great fascination and say, ‘Good for Mother Russia’?”
Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars

What's going on?


are ideologically motivated citizens helping to kill American opportunities (some would say exceptionalism) in the near future?

Obama Frets Over Melting Ice While Putin Claims The Arctic


Even the Council on Foreign Relations has something to say about it

In the twenty-first century, many experts believe that climate change, technological advances, and rising global demand for resources may at last unlock the considerable economic potential of the Circumpolar North. The melting of Arctic sea ice to record lows in recent years has prompted many nations, principally those with Arctic Ocean coastlines—the United States, Canada, Russia, Norway, and Denmark (Greenland)—to reassess their commitments and interests in the icy reaches atop the globe.

Many forecast Arctic summers will be free of ice in a matter of decades, potentially opening the region up to hundreds of billions of dollars in investment, including energy production, shipping, and fishing. The thaw will also pose new security demands as greater human activity induces states to increase their military and constabulary presence. While most experts dismiss the prospects for armed aggression in the Arctic, some defense analysts and academics assert that territorial disputes and a competition for resources have primed the Arctic for a new Cold War.


http://www.cfr.org/arctic/emerging-arctic/p32620#!/


Can't help but wonder if the dragging feet approach to climate change is deliberate. Some joint effort to melt polar ice to get to the oil.
 
What is it with these amateur climate scientists like westwall and their graphs and images as if they actually know what they are talking about and funnier -- as if they are actually qualified to debate the climate science?

Then they try to engage people into tit for tats with dueling images and graphs?

Dante has consistently stated he does not play a climate scientist on the web or in real life. Dante not only bets on the fastest horse, the scientific consensus, but he bets that no matter what, the poor demented denier types will go to their graves insisting it's all been a global conspiracy that is anti-American ignoring it is American companies that have been on board for decades
There is no "scientific consensus".

You are a victim of brainwashing.
 
Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars - The Melting Ice Sheet

What's going on?

http://graphics.latimes.com/exxon-arctic/

Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars

What's going on?


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/30/world/united-states-russia-arctic-exploration.html

Has Corporate America been falling behind? Or has the US Government since the 1980s not been hard enough on developing plans for the Arctic?

Between 1986 and 1992, Croasdale’s team looked at both the positive and negative effects that a warming Arctic would have on oil operations, reporting its findings to Exxon headquarters in Houston and New Jersey.


The good news for Exxon, he told an audience of academics and government researchers in 1992, was that “potential global warming can only help lower exploration and development costs” in the Beaufort Sea.


---

In 2012, with great fanfare, China sent a refurbished icebreaker, the Xuelong, or Snow Dragon, across one such route. Signaling its ambitions to be a “polar expedition power,” China is now building a second icebreaker, giving it an icebreaking fleet equal to America’s. Russia, by far the largest Arctic nation, has 41 in all.

“The United States really isn’t even in this game,” Admiral Zukunft said at a conference in Washington this year.

He lamented the lack of urgency in Washington, contrasting it with the challenges of the Cold War, when the United States and the Soviet Union confronted each other in the Arctic and beyond. “When Russia put Sputnik in outer space, did we sit with our hands in pocket with great fascination and say, ‘Good for Mother Russia’?”
Exxon - Warming in the Arctic - Russia - Oil Wars

What's going on?


are ideologically motivated citizens helping to kill American opportunities (some would say exceptionalism) in the near future?

Obama Frets Over Melting Ice While Putin Claims The Arctic


Even the Council on Foreign Relations has something to say about it

In the twenty-first century, many experts believe that climate change, technological advances, and rising global demand for resources may at last unlock the considerable economic potential of the Circumpolar North. The melting of Arctic sea ice to record lows in recent years has prompted many nations, principally those with Arctic Ocean coastlines—the United States, Canada, Russia, Norway, and Denmark (Greenland)—to reassess their commitments and interests in the icy reaches atop the globe.

Many forecast Arctic summers will be free of ice in a matter of decades, potentially opening the region up to hundreds of billions of dollars in investment, including energy production, shipping, and fishing. The thaw will also pose new security demands as greater human activity induces states to increase their military and constabulary presence. While most experts dismiss the prospects for armed aggression in the Arctic, some defense analysts and academics assert that territorial disputes and a competition for resources have primed the Arctic for a new Cold War.


http://www.cfr.org/arctic/emerging-arctic/p32620#!/


Can't help but wonder if the dragging feet approach to climate change is deliberate. Some joint effort to melt polar ice to get to the oil.
D4E, do you even know what glaciers do? Don't you even know that they move.
 
We haven't had a sound coherent energy policy in this country since the Eisenhower administration.

We're the only nation on earth that doesn't allow drilling in our outer-continental shelves. And we're the only ones to prohibit the export of domestically produced crude oil.
 

Forum List

Back
Top