Exposing The Neo-Jews

[JimBowie1958]

Hey poli. The reason Jews , blacks and basically all
Minorities vote dem is simple . The GOP is the party of racists and that's a deal breaker .

Bullshit.

The Dimms are the party of race baiting, Jim Crow and the defense of slavery as blacks are too stupid to be free (they once claimed).

Blacks in the Dimmocratic party makes as much sense as Jews in a Nazi party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hey poli. The reason Jews , blacks and basically all
Minorities vote dem is simple . The GOP is the party of racists and that's a deal breaker .

There are so very many differences between the two of us, that reciting them would require far more time and space than this venue allows.

But....for proof, notice that when I design and construct a thread, it is documented, supported, and proven with numerous examples.


Your slander, alas, "The GOP is the party of racists," includes not a single example, documentation, nor hint of support.
Hence, you are clearly revealed to be both a liar and a fool.

Agreed?

Cutting and pasting hack articles written by far right kooks is proof of nothing .

You've never had an independent thought since I've been here . You might as well be a spam bot .

Hey poli. The reason Jews , blacks and basically all
Minorities vote dem is simple . The GOP is the party of racists and that's a deal breaker .

There are so very many differences between the two of us, that reciting them would require far more time and space than this venue allows.

But....for proof, notice that when I design and construct a thread, it is documented, supported, and proven with numerous examples.


Your slander, alas, "The GOP is the party of racists," includes not a single example, documentation, nor hint of support.
Hence, you are clearly revealed to be both a liar and a fool.

Agreed?

Cutting and pasting hack articles written by far right kooks is proof of nothing .

You've never had an independent thought since I've been here . You might as well be a spam bot .

There are so very many differences between the two of us, that reciting them would require far more time and space than this venue allows.

But....for proof, notice that when I design and construct a thread, it is documented, supported, and proven with numerous examples.


Your slander, alas, "The GOP is the party of racists," includes not a single example, documentation, nor hint of support.
Hence, you are clearly revealed to be both a liar and a fool.

And a day later you still cannot support your post.

You are and will always be a liar and a fool.

Agreed?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Politics trumps (pardon the pun) religious affiliation primarily on the left because lefties have no basic core values. You can't even call Chuckie Schumer a hypocrite for supporting an anti-semite congressman for DNC chair. He is merely an empty suit.

Cons have fake "values" that they dump whenever they become inconvenient.

"Cons have fake "values" that they dump whenever they become inconvenient."


Let's check the examples you've been able to provide....


Hmmm......


None.


You must be a Liberal, huh?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Apparently this thread is introducing us to its author's Neo-anti-semitism.

 

[Timmy]

Politics trumps (pardon the pun) religious affiliation primarily on the left because lefties have no basic core values. You can't even call Chuckie Schumer a hypocrite for supporting an anti-semite congressman for DNC chair. He is merely an empty suit.

Cons have fake "values" that they dump whenever they become inconvenient.

"Cons have fake "values" that they dump whenever they become inconvenient."


Let's check the examples you've been able to provide....


Hmmm......


None.


You must be a Liberal, huh?

You want examples?

Cons say they are pro troops. Until one gets in their way then they mock their service . See John Kerry and McCain .

Cons are for state rights . Except if we are talking about pot.

Cons are fo religious freedom. Except when it's non Christians, they must be banned from the US .

 

[PoliticalChic]

Politics trumps (pardon the pun) religious affiliation primarily on the left because lefties have no basic core values. You can't even call Chuckie Schumer a hypocrite for supporting an anti-semite congressman for DNC chair. He is merely an empty suit.

Cons have fake "values" that they dump whenever they become inconvenient.

"Cons have fake "values" that they dump whenever they become inconvenient."


Let's check the examples you've been able to provide....


Hmmm......


None.


You must be a Liberal, huh?

You want examples?

Cons say they are pro troops. Until one gets in their way then they mock their service . See John Kerry and McCain .

Cons are for state rights . Except if we are talking about pot.

Cons are fo religious freedom. Except when it's non Christians, they must be banned from the US .

Still waiting for linked,sourced examples.

Via this post, you have continued to be our best source of Greenhouse gases.

 

[Timmy]

Politics trumps (pardon the pun) religious affiliation primarily on the left because lefties have no basic core values. You can't even call Chuckie Schumer a hypocrite for supporting an anti-semite congressman for DNC chair. He is merely an empty suit.

Cons have fake "values" that they dump whenever they become inconvenient.

"Cons have fake "values" that they dump whenever they become inconvenient."


Let's check the examples you've been able to provide....


Hmmm......


None.


You must be a Liberal, huh?

You want examples?

Cons say they are pro troops. Until one gets in their way then they mock their service . See John Kerry and McCain .

Cons are for state rights . Except if we are talking about pot.

Cons are fo religious freedom. Except when it's non Christians, they must be banned from the US .

Still waiting for linked,sourced examples.

Via this post, you have continued to be our best source of Greenhouse gases.

Why do you need links to common knowledge?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Politics trumps (pardon the pun) religious affiliation primarily on the left because lefties have no basic core values. You can't even call Chuckie Schumer a hypocrite for supporting an anti-semite congressman for DNC chair. He is merely an empty suit.

Cons have fake "values" that they dump whenever they become inconvenient.

"Cons have fake "values" that they dump whenever they become inconvenient."


Let's check the examples you've been able to provide....


Hmmm......


None.


You must be a Liberal, huh?

You want examples?

Cons say they are pro troops. Until one gets in their way then they mock their service . See John Kerry and McCain .

Cons are for state rights . Except if we are talking about pot.

Cons are fo religious freedom. Except when it's non Christians, they must be banned from the US .

Still waiting for linked,sourced examples.

Via this post, you have continued to be our best source of Greenhouse gases.

Why do you need links to common knowledge?

Your education continues.


1. Citing an authority with an established reputation is better, of course, than citing someone whose credentials are not so lofty. (http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml)

Composition Patterns: Developing an Argument

2. What has been pejoratively referred to as ‘simply cut and paste,’ is, in fact, carefully chosen to substantiate a point. Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of facts.(Critical Appraisal and Analysis - Critically Analyzing Information Sources - LibGuides at Cornell University)


3. While you will never be able to construct an unassailable post as I do, a more extensive reading, studying, and research program would suit every Liberal far better than the propaganda and talking points that you rely on.


Reform your self forthwith.