Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The thing to remember about the skewed polling? WISCONSIN BABY...WISCONSIN! The media tried to hand it to the democrat there as well...
RCP had Walker up over Barrett the entire election.
Whoosh!
The thing to remember about the skewed polling? WISCONSIN BABY...WISCONSIN! The media tried to hand it to the democrat there as well...
RCP had Walker up over Barrett the entire election.
Whoosh!
Perhaps so...But there also was a record democrat turnout in '08, that is highly unlikely to repeat itself....It's also patently obvious that democrats are being oversampled, to the point that the oversamples are the basically the spread in the polls.The thing to remember about the skewed polling? WISCONSIN BABY...WISCONSIN! The media tried to hand it to the democrat there as well...
RCP had Walker up over Barrett the entire election.
Whoosh!
Yeah, I don't recall one credible pollster or pundit actually claiming Walker would lose. I wanted Walker to lose, and I was the first to acknowledge he'd almost certainly win.
In 2008 they were talking about the Bradley Effect and telling Democrats "BE READY TO LOSE SUCKERS!". Didn't manifest in 2008 and the polls won't be wrong this year either.
Perhaps so...But there also was a record democrat turnout in '08, that is highly unlikely to repeat itself....It's also patently obvious that democrats are being oversampled, to the point that the oversamples are the basically the spread in the polls.
Trust me...Libertarians like me aren't going to vote for Boiking.
Pre-elction polls are BS. I remember reading about an election, (maybe Carter?) That the loser was up 9 points and the opposing won by a landslide. You can make the polls outcome in your favor. Pretty sure that is why obama is up. Well at least on CNN/ABC/YAHOO/NBC LOL!
Oh, hell no...I haven't voted for a single republican since '94....But that's just me.Trust me...Libertarians like me aren't going to vote for Boiking.
But will you vote for Mitt? I've got to say, if ever there was an election I expect a third party candidate to break 10% in some states, it's this one. When your choice is a Liberal from Massachusetts and a Liberal from Illinois.... well... that third party option is looking mighty attractive even for me.
The thing to remember about the skewed polling? WISCONSIN BABY...WISCONSIN! The media tried to hand it to the democrat there as well...
RCP had Walker up over Barrett the entire election.
Whoosh!
You realize your link doesnt prove what you write, right?
[The thing to remember about the skewed polling? WISCONSIN BABY...WISCONSIN! The media tried to hand it to the democrat there as well...
Finally, what do the Independent voter numbers show? Even in these corrupt polls where Dems are being egregiously oversampled, Romney has a DOUBLE DIGIT lead amongst Independents.
Nuff said.
What Obama and his allies are doing now: The Democrats want to convince [these anti-Obama voters] falsely that Romney will lose to discourage them from voting. So they lobby the pollsters to weight their surveys to emulate the 2008 Democrat-heavy models. They are lobbying them now to affect early voting. IVR [Interactive Voice Response] polls are heavily weighted. You can weight to whatever result you want. Some polls have included sizable segments of voters who say they are not enthusiastic to vote or non-voters to dilute Republicans. Major pollsters have samples with Republican affiliation in the 20 to 30 percent range, at such low levels not seen since the 1960s in states like Virginia, Florida, North Carolina and which then place Obama ahead. The intended effect is to suppress Republican turnout through media polling bias. Well see a lot more of this.
Read More
The thing to remember about the skewed polling? WISCONSIN BABY...WISCONSIN! The media tried to hand it to the democrat there as well...
RCP had Walker up over Barrett the entire election.
Whoosh!
You realize your link doesnt prove what you write, right?
Dem Poll Shows Walker and Barrett Tied in Recall | Mother Jones
Poll: Walker, Barrett tied in recall race - Mackenzie Weinger - POLITICO.com
Daily Kos: Marquette Poll: Tom Barrett and Scott Walker Tied in WI Governor Recall Race
DOOSSHH!
You realize your link doesnt prove what you write, right?
Dem Poll Shows Walker and Barrett Tied in Recall | Mother Jones
Poll: Walker, Barrett tied in recall race - Mackenzie Weinger - POLITICO.com
Daily Kos: Marquette Poll: Tom Barrett and Scott Walker Tied in WI Governor Recall Race
DOOSSHH!
Like most liberals reinventing the talking points as if the internet can't be uncovered to reveal their horseshit- he just attempts to ignore the facts. The facts are that the media polls are being heavenly weighted in favor of Obama...that is what exit polls for Walker did as well and again, was propagated by a biased media...and we all saw how that worked for them.
You realize your link doesnt prove what you write, right?
I asserted that RCP had Walker up the entire campaign and the link to RCP that I provided backs that claim up.
Does it hurt to be this stupid?
Winner - Rassmussen A-
2008 Intrade Vs. Actual Election Results
Winner - Rasmussen, Pew
The List: Which presidential polls were most accurate? | Texas on the Potomac | a Chron.com blog
Winner - Rassmussen A
Flashback: Rasmussen Most Accurate Pollster in 2008
Winner - Rassmussen, Pew
http://www.fordham.edu/images/acade...ccuracy in the 2008 presidential election.pdf
In reference to the 2008 presidential election, a Talking Points Memo article said, "Rasmussen's final polls had Obama ahead 52%-46%, which was nearly identical to Obama's final margin of 53%-46%, and made him one of the most accurate pollsters out there
Rasmussen Reports - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 2010, Rasmussen Reports was the first to show Republican Scott Brown had a chance to defeat Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts Senate race. Just after Brown's upset win, Ben Smith at Politico reported, "The overwhelming conventional wisdom in both parties until a Rasmussen poll showed the race in single digits in early January was that Martha Coakley was a lock. (It's hard to recall a single poll changing the mood of a race quite that dramatically.)"[45]
A study by Boston University and the Pew Research Centers Project for Excellence in Journalism about how the Massachusetts Senate race was covered in the media concluded, "...Rasmussen Reports poll that showed the overwhelming Republican underdog, Scott Brown, climbing to within single digits (nine points) of Martha Coakley. That poll, perhaps more than anything else, signaled that a possible upset was brewing and galvanized both the media and political worlds.
Rasmussen Reports - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia