TheProgressivePatriot
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #161
Oh good grief Dickey boy! Get a grip! Such histrionics do not become you." Marriage was basically an institution to protect children and to prevent inbreeding and queers can't breed anyway, ?" Make up your mind. Can gay people "breed "or not ? You seem terribly confused. You have some strange ideas about how marriage came to be and why. I would try to school you but I'm not certified in special education.Well marriage between a man and a woman was been the law for a lot longer, faggot. Besides why do you give a shit? Marriage was basically an institution to protect children and to prevent inbreeding and queers can't breed anyway, thankfully. Of course you could always move to someplace where life is easier for queers, whoever that place maybe if it exists. I know why not try the middle east and some of the Muslim countries? LOLThis is sickening, disgusting and heart breaking ! There is something seriously wrong with people who think that they have the right to control the lives of other people in the name of their distorted and bastardized version of religious liberty.
Same sex marriage has been the law of the land since June of 2015. Five years. Same sex couples have actually been getting married much longer than that in some states. Society has not been undermined and the institution of marriage has not been destroyed. In fact, in my estimation, is stronger when there is inclusion and the base is broadened.
Furthermore, it is not even an issue for the vast majority of Americans. These same sex couple have just become part of the social fabric and are an integral part of the community like everyone else. They work, they pay taxes, they volunteer, the maintain homes and establish families. And now they and their children can enjoy the same legal protections , financial advantages and social status as the rest of us take for granted.
And what will happen if Obergefell is overturned. No doubt some states- and we could pretty much name then- would halt such weddings. But it is unknown if they would, or could void the marriages that have taken place already. Straight people should consider how they would feel if their marriage was somehow annulled for some bogus religious reason- such as not being married in a church. They should think about how their lives would be upended by a cascade of legal and financial issues thrown at them.
It is clear to me that people like Davis and Moore have serious problems and suffer from something bordering on a religious psychosis. They have absolutely no compassion or empathy for the people who would be devastated by this.
I can think of no time in the history of this nation that a right was established and then revoked. It would truly be a dark day in America if such a thing were to happen . My only hope is that John Roberts, a conservative to be sure- but one who is also concerned about his legacy, and that of his court-would not let this happen.
Ex-Judge Roy Moore Files Supreme Court Brief to Urge End to Equal Marriage
"The Foundation believes that the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment did not intend for it to protect a right to same-sex marriage," the briefing said.www.newsweek.com
Moving on, the fact is that gay people can and do have children by a variety of means just like heterosexuals do. More importantly, they provide homes and are parents to those children .
Lastly, your making assumptions about my sexuality based on my politics exposes just how apathetically ignorant you are as does you reference to moving to to someplace where life is easier for queers. The fact is that life is quite good for gay people right here these days, despite the dwindling ignorance and bigotry of dinosaurs like you who will soon be extinct. Wipe the spit off of you chin and get a grip DICKEY !
