Evading Mosher’s FOI

Discussion in 'Environment' started by IanC, Dec 30, 2011.

  1. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,192
    Thanks Received:
    1,070
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,441
    when the climategate1.0 emails came out the official line was that they were harmless and taken out of context. the climategate2.0 emails have added a lot of context to the original batch, and also undercut many of the excuses that were made to explain the first batch.

    Steve McIntyre of Climate Audit has culled and organized many of the emails that pertain to the effort to thwart FOI in respect to releasing temp data from CRU at UEA. Evading Mosher’s FOI « Climate Audit

    it is interesting to see how Phil Jones sucked in officials from the university to defend him, and how they conspired to evade the law even after they realized Jones had lied to them. I really think some people should lose their jobs as a warning to others who might be tempted to break the law in the future to save face.
     
  2. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,192
    Thanks Received:
    1,070
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,441
    or we could discuss Jones' 'delete all emails' email.

    - Bishop Hill blog - The Palutikoff email

    hahahaha, they didnt delete their emails (except for Wahl), they just moved them somewhere else and 'couldnt find them'. how convenient! not exactly the same statements they gave out for FOI, or after climategate1.0 is it? is no one else concerned at how easily these guys lie to protect themselves or their colleagues? the whistleblower still has over 200,000 more emails that can be released. I wonder if he still expects climate science to come clean by itself, or whether he will just keep releasing more emails to disprove their latest lies and excuses.
     

Share This Page