Even the Warmists Don't Believe In Global Warming

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Conservative, Dec 29, 2011.

  1. Conservative
    Offline

    Conservative Type 40

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    17,082
    Thanks Received:
    2,026
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +2,030
    Even the Warmists Don't Believe In Global Warming - Forbes

    Al Gore can suck it.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,560
    Thanks Received:
    5,424
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,368
    Geo-engineering involve major unforseen consequences. But the rest of the article is pure shit.

    Home
     
  3. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,571
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,674
    But what of the Progressives’ argument that, because the effects of climate change are potentially so disastrous, we should surrender our freedom and move to a centrally planned world economy managed by experts, “just in case”?

    Someone speaking for someone else..., AGAIN!!! Either attach that quote to a specific person or persons or STFU. Why should we accept conservatives telling us, "I've got mine, to hell with the rest of you"? Why would we want to accept such a patently unChristian philosophy?!?!
     
  4. Conservative
    Offline

    Conservative Type 40

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    17,082
    Thanks Received:
    2,026
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +2,030
    such as?????
     
  5. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,560
    Thanks Received:
    5,424
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,368
    Now if we knew for sure, they would not be unforeseen, now, would they.

    Aswan Dam is a prime example of unforeseen consequences. And the effects of many of the suggestions would be world wide, and not easily remedied.

    However, having said this, were you to read what the scientists reactions to the massive methane outgassing in the Arctic last fall, you would see that they are actively considering geo-engineering, contrary to that shit article.

    I really find it disturbing that people actually write this kind of nonsense without the slightest research as to what the scientists are actually doing.
     
  6. Conservative
    Offline

    Conservative Type 40

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    17,082
    Thanks Received:
    2,026
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +2,030
    you claim geo-engineering involves 'major unforeseen consequences'.

    you then go on to say 'Now if we knew for sure, they would not be unforeseen, now, would they'.

    You're telling me there are major consequences, but you don't know what they are.

    HOW then, do you know they are 'major'?
     
  7. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,269
    Thanks Received:
    2,920
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,257
    The progressives best get used to lots and lots of fracking and clean coal in the coming years..........its happening s0ns. Best buckle up your chinstraps and hope for the next green techonology because green energy stuff is going to get its trickle her and trickle there.........nothing more......at least for a decade. Only the hopelessly duped think its anything more than a fad.
     
  8. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,571
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,674
    Is there really even a question of 'if'? The logical topics of discussion are 'when' and 'how bad'. Just thought I'd clear things up so we can all start a new year with the proper perspective.


    :party: HAPPY NEW YEAR
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2011
  9. skookerasbil
    Offline

    skookerasbil Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    24,269
    Thanks Received:
    2,920
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Not the middle of nowhere
    Ratings:
    +6,257
    CONSERVATIVE...........I just read the article. Brilliant and so spot on.

    Ive been saying it for two solid years now.,.......the alarmist contingent is upstream wihtout a paddle. Their cause is so hopeless at this point.......the past two years, the escalator down has been at a rate that is amazing even to me.
     
  10. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    41,016
    Thanks Received:
    7,987
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +19,784





    Methane plumes are a result of sea water intrusion THOUSANDS OF YEARS ago. And will naturally go away in a few more thousand years. Mother Earth works sloooooooowly.

    Though not as slow as olfraud!:lol::lol:
     

Share This Page