Gold Member
- Apr 26, 2011
- 2,979
- 500
- 130
He was out of line for trying to assert that "contempt" is not important to Holder, he was being disrespectful toward Holder by trying to assert something that has no real merit.
Your last three sentences reflect they type of mental midget that you are. Thanks for the laugh clown.
Holder was held in contempt because he refused to cooperate with a Congressional investigation into who ultimately signed off on a program that allowed thousands of assault weapons to be transported into Mexico by known criminals with drug cartel connections. These weapons are still turning up at crime scenes in Mexico.
Why is that not important to you? Why would this administration, after unequivocally denouncing Bush for doing it, invoke executive privilege to protect the people responsible for this?
Are you really that partisan?
What was the final disposition of those contempt charges? Was he indicted? I didn't know Bush did the same thing, were the Republicans outraged by it then, did they hold a Congressional investigation into it?
Why invoke Executive Privilege? Who has been held responsible? Was the initial program ended during Bush's tenure?