Uhhh, OK???P F Tinmore, et al,
I SIS NOT say that; not at all.
(COMMENT)Why do you pimp Israeli propaganda?Article 30 does say "nationals of the State to which such territory is transferred." Assuming that the word "state" is interpreted to mean government, THEN: the interpretation would be: nationals of the Territory to which the Mandate Applied.
But in NO CASE has the implication been made that in 1923, there was a "State of Palestine." The Government of Palestine was the Mandatory.
The Mandate was not Palestine.
It is important to understand, and understand the short title for what is means.
§ The first clause in the Preamble for the Mandate for Palestine (1922):Neither the Mandatory Powers that were appointed of the Convention of Allied Powers, or the Council for the League of Nations had yet made an agreement which the exact boundaries of (what was to become) "Palestine." In 1922 the Boundary Commission Report was yet to be reviewed and accepted by the newly appointed Mandatory Powers. It had been submitted by Lieutenant Colonel N. Paulet, French Army Surveyor, and Lieutenant Colonel S. F. Newcombe, British Army, HM's Royal Engineers, leadership of the Boundary Commission.
§ This Order may be cited as "The Palestine Order in Council, 1922."
[The Allied] Powers [said:] the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them;
•√• The limits of this Order are the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine.
This boundary definition was not to change until after the end of hostilities and the establishment of the Armistice Agreements of 1949, following the armed incursion across the frontiers.
Most Respectfully,
R
This boundary definition was not to change until after the end of hostilities and the establishment of the Armistice Agreements of 1949, following the armed incursion across the frontiers.
Do you have some links to that?
You are joking right, RIGHT ! ! ! ! have you completely ignored every link from the UN archives that show the arab league invaded the mandate of palestine and then were driven back by the Jews. The accepted boundary was altered by an international treaty signed by the parties involved, and the palestinian signature was obviously missing as it did not exist as a nation.the arab league invaded the mandate of palestine
Indeed, Palestine not Israel. They did not attack Palestine. They did not attack Israel. So where do you get that they started the war when they did not attack anybody?
BTW, the Mandate left Palestine the day before.
Indeed, there was no mythical "state of Pal'istan". You're forever befuddled by contingent history.