John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 22,601
- 12,074
- 1,288
seymour flops is a bot asking others if they are bots
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Exactly what a bot would be programmed to say.seymour flops is a bot asking others if they are bots
Actually, she made her sex life the state’s business when she decided conducted, and I weigh so as to to interfere with a marriage, which is a state sanctioned binding contract. Such “private” behavior becomes public when it comes out in a divorce. She, being nominally a lawyer, should have known that.
It is also the state’s business when she and her married lover colluded to defraud the state and the county out of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The fact she is hot on Trump's heels and got several gulty pleas says otherwise.It is you Trump deranged folk who should be most concerned about Willis’ conduct in office. Using the investigation as a way to enrich her married lover should make you ask yourself whether she is committed to convicting Trump or is it to stretch out the case to make as much money for her beau as possible.
Why is this anyone's business? It seems you are the one with the sexual hangups. They dated, they found they weren't compatible, and they moved on and stayed friends. This is what adults do.Furthermore, I don’t know why she decided she had to have another woman’s man, when there are literally millions of single American men like our own unfortunate Mr. @fjb who are reduced to dating sites from which they are regularly kicked off for being too “enthusiastic.”
exactly what a counter bot would sayExactly what a bot would be programmed to say.
Evidence?exactly what a counter bot would say
flops, stop with the allegations and come up with evidence
She showed the receipts!More allegations from Merchant. Everyone knows they had an affair. No one has proven corruption.
Stop the Orange allegations.
No, the defense only has to show the obvious: that Willis has mishandled the case and should be DQ!Your side has to prove criminality. No one has to prove innocence to you.
Defense has not done that. It has not. She has shown the case has followed the elements of proof.No, the defense only has to show the obvious: that Willis has mishandled the case and should be DQ!