Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Babbling the truth, dupe.All your personal attack don't change the facts, but you keep babbling...You are totally misinformed, hater dupe. A functional snarling cretin. Absolutely clueless, the world's laughingstock and horror. Racist ugly American fool of the greedy idiot megarich New BS GOP.Your desired Commander and Chief is a lying POS with absolutely no credibility...What difference does it make?Silly wingnuts!
...yet you STILL want that as your President.
Sept. 16, 2012, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice went on five Sunday TV news shows to explain why a few days earlier attacks on U.S. State Department facilities in Benghazi, Libya, killed four Americans, including our ambassador. It was all just a demonstration provoked by an Internet video that got out of hand, Rice said.
It was a cover-up, of course. Rice was pushing in a re-election year a fiction that the administration believed would do the least amount of damage to President Obama’s campaign.
The administration couldn’t allow itself to admit that things were going poorly in the Middle East after it had been saying progress was being made.
Clinton herself went with the story even though she knew it wasn’t true. But was she merely a cog in the conspiracy to cover up the truth, or one of its planners?
An email from a batch released Monday strongly suggests she was an architect.
Her schedule, the Washington Examiner has reported, shows that Clinton met with Rice in Clinton’s office from 9:30 a.m. to 10 a.m. on Sept. 14, 2012 — two days before Rice misled the American people.
The emailed schedule shows only that a meeting with Rice was planned. No subject was referenced. But a previously released Sept. 14, 2012, email that White House aide Ben Rhodes sent to several high-ranking administration staffers had the subject line: “RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 p.m. ET.”
At that prep session, Rice was told “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”
Was this narrative concocted that morning when Clinton and Rice met?
Clinton Emails: It Looks Like She Was An Architect Of The Benghazi Lie
Indictments coming down any day now, any day now.
Are you really that stupid?Derp Derp DerpThat's what she said about her incompetence.What difference does it make?
Sept. 16, 2012, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice went on five Sunday TV news shows to explain why a few days earlier attacks on U.S. State Department facilities in Benghazi, Libya, killed four Americans, including our ambassador. It was all just a demonstration provoked by an Internet video that got out of hand, Rice said.
It was a cover-up, of course. Rice was pushing in a re-election year a fiction that the administration believed would do the least amount of damage to President Obama’s campaign.
The administration couldn’t allow itself to admit that things were going poorly in the Middle East after it had been saying progress was being made.
Clinton herself went with the story even though she knew it wasn’t true. But was she merely a cog in the conspiracy to cover up the truth, or one of its planners?
An email from a batch released Monday strongly suggests she was an architect.
Her schedule, the Washington Examiner has reported, shows that Clinton met with Rice in Clinton’s office from 9:30 a.m. to 10 a.m. on Sept. 14, 2012 — two days before Rice misled the American people.
The emailed schedule shows only that a meeting with Rice was planned. No subject was referenced. But a previously released Sept. 14, 2012, email that White House aide Ben Rhodes sent to several high-ranking administration staffers had the subject line: “RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 p.m. ET.”
At that prep session, Rice was told “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”
Was this narrative concocted that morning when Clinton and Rice met?
Clinton Emails: It Looks Like She Was An Architect Of The Benghazi Lie
Indictments coming down any day now, any day now.
You think she would say that to the families?Derp Derp DerpThat's what she said about her incompetence.What difference does it make?
I don't see why anyone thinks this is going to change the mind of anyone voting for Hillary. They get on Trump for what he said about the fact he could shoot someone and his voters will still vote for him. That made Trump sound so bad but Hillary was actually responsible for someone getting killed and Hillary supporters will still voter for her.
That is a nice bit to bring up during the Trump/Clinton debates!!!Sept. 16, 2012, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice went on five Sunday TV news shows to explain why a few days earlier attacks on U.S. State Department facilities in Benghazi, Libya, killed four Americans, including our ambassador. It was all just a demonstration provoked by an Internet video that got out of hand, Rice said.
It was a cover-up, of course. Rice was pushing in a re-election year a fiction that the administration believed would do the least amount of damage to President Obama’s campaign.
The administration couldn’t allow itself to admit that things were going poorly in the Middle East after it had been saying progress was being made.
Clinton herself went with the story even though she knew it wasn’t true. But was she merely a cog in the conspiracy to cover up the truth, or one of its planners?
An email from a batch released Monday strongly suggests she was an architect.
Her schedule, the Washington Examiner has reported, shows that Clinton met with Rice in Clinton’s office from 9:30 a.m. to 10 a.m. on Sept. 14, 2012 — two days before Rice misled the American people.
The emailed schedule shows only that a meeting with Rice was planned. No subject was referenced. But a previously released Sept. 14, 2012, email that White House aide Ben Rhodes sent to several high-ranking administration staffers had the subject line: “RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 p.m. ET.”
At that prep session, Rice was told “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”
Was this narrative concocted that morning when Clinton and Rice met?
Clinton Emails: It Looks Like She Was An Architect Of The Benghazi Lie
I read it differently. I believe Clinton prepped her initially and Rhodes did a Prep/Confirmation call on Saturday before the shows.The article says and shows the EXACT opposite of what the op says, it shows she did not gather anyone to PREP Rice, that this was done by the whitehouse staffer Ben Rhodes and his team, the following day, at 4 pm, Saturday.
DUH....IF Hillary prepped her in her 30 minute meeting friday am, why would she need to be prepped by the whitehouse team?
Can't you all read and comprehend what you read?
holy smokes!
the tapes or transcripts from the prepping conversation with Rhodes, others from the Whitehouse, and Rice were released by the Benghazi committee over a year ago, (lots of posts/threads on it here)...I read it differently. I believe Clinton prepped her initially and Rhodes did a Prep/Confirmation call on Saturday before the shows.The article says and shows the EXACT opposite of what the op says, it shows she did not gather anyone to PREP Rice, that this was done by the whitehouse staffer Ben Rhodes and his team, the following day, at 4 pm, Saturday.
DUH....IF Hillary prepped her in her 30 minute meeting friday am, why would she need to be prepped by the whitehouse team?
Can't you all read and comprehend what you read?
holy smokes!
