Discussion in 'Election Forums' started by Conservative, Nov 6, 2012.
Libtards be desperate.
When was it painted?
Was there no other spot in the school that could be used?
Yup... My guess is that since it wasn't covered up election Law has been violated.
Doesn't really matter when it was painted. It's presence that close to the voting area is electioneering. It should have bee covered.
there is nothi ng wrong with a school having a mural of the president of the US
Where does it solicit votes?
moron. it's an attempt to influence voters, having it next to the voting machines. It's electioneering and should have been covered.
I guess if it was a mural of Bush, you'd be okay with that too, right?
Well.. in my eyes.. it kinda does... if this was painted before (months or years ago) then the choice made of the placement was bad and these idiotic people need to be taken out of the responsibility of setting up the polling place.... if this was pained after the placement choice, this was a deliberate act to sway people
just the fact that the machines were placed in front of it is an attempt to sway voters. It should have been covered if there was no place else to house the machines.
Separate names with a comma.