- Banned
- #241
Eat a dick douche bag.
No one was talking to you my lonely child. If you need attention just ask....otherwise stfu
It's on a public message board, you are talking to everyone.
Did you read that in a fortune cookie?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Eat a dick douche bag.
No one was talking to you my lonely child. If you need attention just ask....otherwise stfu
It's on a public message board, you are talking to everyone.
Zero sympathy here forgot and guns do not go together.
With gun ownership comes responsibility, and part of that responsibility is knowing gun laws, policies, rules, and regulations.
Its better he learn a hard lesson at a young age.
Lets hope this will compel him to never forget about a gun again.
Amen!
You people everyone of you are beyond idiots. So a felony on his record and not getting a diploma is ok with you,I will repeat your a FUCKING ass sucking retard.
CaféAuLait;7176501 said:Eagle Scout Facing Expulsion over Gun Charge
PRINCETON, N.C. (WTVD) -- A Johnston County high school student has been expelled for bringing a gun onto school property, but the school's student body is coming to his defense.
David "Cole" Withrow is a senior at Princeton High School. He was set to graduate in just a few weeks, until his arrest Monday for bringing a gun to school.
Cole, who is an Eagle Scout and an honors student, said he forgot to take his gun out of his truck after skeet shooting. When he got to school and realized the gun was in his car, he went into school to call his mom so he could leave and take the gun home.
Some in the community wonder how a senior with just days left of school can be expelled when two years ago, the school's assistant principal accidentally brought a loaded gun to school in her car and was only suspended for three days.
Students defend classmate expelled for gun | abc11.com
.Withrow had spent the weekend camping with a group of his friends, including Boykins son. The boys went fishing for catfish on Saturday and skeet shooting on Sunday.
He realized he had left his shotgun in his truck on Monday morning as he reached to grab his book bag, said Boykin.
He didnt know what to do, she told Fox News. If you jump in the truck and leave, then they get you for skipping school. Once you are there you have to say.
So the teenager, who did his senior class project on gun safety, locked his truck, walked to the front office and called his mother. Thats when the trouble started
Eagle Scout Facing Expulsion over Gun Charge | FOX News & Commentary: Todd Starnes
So this kid was going to graduate with honors and now he can't. I also find it interesting that the vice principal made the same mistake and was only suspended for three days. I feel there should be a grey area and not so black and white. If the kid had not called his mother to do the right thing school adminstrators would have probably never know the gun was in his car.
CaféAuLait;7176501 said:Eagle Scout Facing Expulsion over Gun Charge
PRINCETON, N.C. (WTVD) -- A Johnston County high school student has been expelled for bringing a gun onto school property, but the school's student body is coming to his defense.
David "Cole" Withrow is a senior at Princeton High School. He was set to graduate in just a few weeks, until his arrest Monday for bringing a gun to school.
Cole, who is an Eagle Scout and an honors student, said he forgot to take his gun out of his truck after skeet shooting. When he got to school and realized the gun was in his car, he went into school to call his mom so he could leave and take the gun home.
Some in the community wonder how a senior with just days left of school can be expelled when two years ago, the school's assistant principal accidentally brought a loaded gun to school in her car and was only suspended for three days.
Students defend classmate expelled for gun | abc11.com
.Withrow had spent the weekend camping with a group of his friends, including Boykins son. The boys went fishing for catfish on Saturday and skeet shooting on Sunday.
He realized he had left his shotgun in his truck on Monday morning as he reached to grab his book bag, said Boykin.
He didnt know what to do, she told Fox News. If you jump in the truck and leave, then they get you for skipping school. Once you are there you have to say.
So the teenager, who did his senior class project on gun safety, locked his truck, walked to the front office and called his mother. Thats when the trouble started
Eagle Scout Facing Expulsion over Gun Charge | FOX News & Commentary: Todd Starnes
So this kid was going to graduate with honors and now he can't. I also find it interesting that the vice principal made the same mistake and was only suspended for three days. I feel there should be a grey area and not so black and white. If the kid had not called his mother to do the right thing school adminstrators would have probably never know the gun was in his car.
Another case of zero tolerance run amok. Schools have got to stop punishing kids for doing the right thing.
Amen!
You people everyone of you are beyond idiots. So a felony on his record and not getting a diploma is ok with you,I will repeat your a FUCKING ass sucking retard.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Again, with rights come responsibility, particularly concerning gun ownership.
The student in question brought a firearm to school in violation of school policy; that he forgot it was in the vehicle is legally irrelevant.
The firearm should have been removed from the car after the range session, not left there overnight where the car or firearm might have been stolen, putting yet another illegal gun on the streets. The student had every opportunity to behave responsibility and he failed to do so.
The student was irresponsible with his firearm and may indeed pay the price accordingly.
Why do people throw out common sense, this story would have never burn.
You people everyone of you are beyond idiots. So a felony on his record and not getting a diploma is ok with you,I will repeat your a FUCKING ass sucking retard.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
Again, with rights come responsibility, particularly concerning gun ownership.
The student in question brought a firearm to school in violation of school policy; that he forgot it was in the vehicle is legally irrelevant.
The firearm should have been removed from the car after the range session, not left there overnight where the car or firearm might have been stolen, putting yet another illegal gun on the streets. The student had every opportunity to behave responsibility and he failed to do so.
The student was irresponsible with his firearm and may indeed pay the price accordingly.
Once again, why wasn't the principle treated the same way?
Zero sympathy here – ‘forgot’ and ‘guns’ do not go together.His crime: He went skeet shooting the day before with some friends, safely unloaded and locked up his shotgun in his truck afterward, and then forgot it was there the next day when he drove to school.
With gun ownership comes responsibility, and part of that responsibility is knowing gun laws, policies, rules, and regulations.
It’s better he learn a hard lesson at a young age.
Let’s hope this will compel him to never ‘forget’ about a gun again.
Zero sympathy here – ‘forgot’ and ‘guns’ do not go together.His crime: He went skeet shooting the day before with some friends, safely unloaded and locked up his shotgun in his truck afterward, and then forgot it was there the next day when he drove to school.
With gun ownership comes responsibility, and part of that responsibility is knowing gun laws, policies, rules, and regulations.
It’s better he learn a hard lesson at a young age.
Let’s hope this will compel him to never ‘forget’ about a gun again.
'Not allowed to graduate' simply means he won't be allowed to participate in the graduation ceremonies; it does not mean he won't get his diploma--he will still have his high school record of graduating with honors, etc. If he, indeed, is an honor student with a great high school record and GPA, he will have already applied to and been admitted to the university of his choice, or one of them, so this will in no way affect his future or anything about his life in the long term, except that he, hopefully, will learn a lesson about 'forgetting' where a gun is that he is responsible for. All this means is he won't take part in graduation ceremonies. Not a big deal in the long run. Not a big deal at all.
This is another instance of the anti-gun control people trying to make 'much ado about nothing.'
CaféAuLait;7183535 said:Zero sympathy here forgot and guns do not go together.
With gun ownership comes responsibility, and part of that responsibility is knowing gun laws, policies, rules, and regulations.
Its better he learn a hard lesson at a young age.
Lets hope this will compel him to never forget about a gun again.
'Not allowed to graduate' simply means he won't be allowed to participate in the graduation ceremonies; it does not mean he won't get his diploma--he will still have his high school record of graduating with honors, etc. If he, indeed, is an honor student with a great high school record and GPA, he will have already applied to and been admitted to the university of his choice, or one of them, so this will in no way affect his future or anything about his life in the long term, except that he, hopefully, will learn a lesson about 'forgetting' where a gun is that he is responsible for. All this means is he won't take part in graduation ceremonies. Not a big deal in the long run. Not a big deal at all.
This is another instance of the anti-gun control people trying to make 'much ado about nothing.'
A felony on his record ( he was charged since the admin overheard him calling him mother when he called her to come get the weapon he forgot) will indeed affect his life. A felony his assistant principal, another teacher and a cop were not charged with when they allowed kids to get a loaded weapon out of the principals car and play with it and or bring a loaded weapon onto school property. None were charged only suspended for two days with pay.
CaféAuLait;7183535 said:'Not allowed to graduate' simply means he won't be allowed to participate in the graduation ceremonies; it does not mean he won't get his diploma--he will still have his high school record of graduating with honors, etc. If he, indeed, is an honor student with a great high school record and GPA, he will have already applied to and been admitted to the university of his choice, or one of them, so this will in no way affect his future or anything about his life in the long term, except that he, hopefully, will learn a lesson about 'forgetting' where a gun is that he is responsible for. All this means is he won't take part in graduation ceremonies. Not a big deal in the long run. Not a big deal at all.
This is another instance of the anti-gun control people trying to make 'much ado about nothing.'
A felony on his record ( he was charged since the admin overheard him calling him mother when he called her to come get the weapon he forgot) will indeed affect his life. A felony his assistant principal, another teacher and a cop were not charged with when they allowed kids to get a loaded weapon out of the principals car and play with it and or bring a loaded weapon onto school property. None were charged only suspended for two days with pay.
Being charged is not being convicted. It is highly doubtful he will be convicted of a felony. If it is a first offense, and would be if he is such a good boy as he is painted, it will be reduced to a misdeanor and he will get some kind of slap on the hand. Again, you are trying to make much ado about essentially nothing. And keep in mind, it is not the school that makes law enforcement charges, it is the police department. For whatever reason, the police department/the DA decided to charge him with a felony, not the school. They have no power to do such a thing. To charge someone with a felony means he broke the law; the school rules are one thing, the law is another. Why the DA didn't charge the teachers, who knows. Why don't you find that out. The attempt to try to point the finger for this at the school is ludicrous. They were following procedure they have to follow in reporting this to the police. They don't have a choice to exempt one student as opposed to another, no matter who the student is. If they only targeted certain students who brought guns to school, you'd be attacking the school for being predjudiced against them. This thread is all about being pro-gun and nothing about reason or logic.
Zero sympathy here forgot and guns do not go together.His crime: He went skeet shooting the day before with some friends, safely unloaded and locked up his shotgun in his truck afterward, and then forgot it was there the next day when he drove to school.
With gun ownership comes responsibility, and part of that responsibility is knowing gun laws, policies, rules, and regulations.
Its better he learn a hard lesson at a young age.
Lets hope this will compel him to never forget about a gun again.
'Not allowed to graduate' simply means he won't be allowed to participate in the graduation ceremonies; it does not mean he won't get his diploma--he will still have his high school record of graduating with honors, etc. If he, indeed, is an honor student with a great high school record and GPA, he will have already applied to and been admitted to the university of his choice, or one of them, so this will in no way affect his future or anything about his life in the long term, except that he, hopefully, will learn a lesson about 'forgetting' where a gun is that he is responsible for. All this means is he won't take part in graduation ceremonies. Not a big deal in the long run. Not a big deal at all.
This is another instance of the anti-gun control people trying to make 'much ado about nothing.'
CaféAuLait;7183535 said:'Not allowed to graduate' simply means he won't be allowed to participate in the graduation ceremonies; it does not mean he won't get his diploma--he will still have his high school record of graduating with honors, etc. If he, indeed, is an honor student with a great high school record and GPA, he will have already applied to and been admitted to the university of his choice, or one of them, so this will in no way affect his future or anything about his life in the long term, except that he, hopefully, will learn a lesson about 'forgetting' where a gun is that he is responsible for. All this means is he won't take part in graduation ceremonies. Not a big deal in the long run. Not a big deal at all.
This is another instance of the anti-gun control people trying to make 'much ado about nothing.'
A felony on his record ( he was charged since the admin overheard him calling him mother when he called her to come get the weapon he forgot) will indeed affect his life. A felony his assistant principal, another teacher and a cop were not charged with when they allowed kids to get a loaded weapon out of the principals car and play with it and or bring a loaded weapon onto school property. None were charged only suspended for two days with pay.
Being charged is not being convicted. It is highly doubtful he will be convicted of a felony. If it is a first offense, and would be if he is such a good boy as he is painted, it will be reduced to a misdeanor and he will get some kind of slap on the hand. Again, you are trying to make much ado about essentially nothing. And keep in mind, it is not the school that makes law enforcement charges, it is the police department. For whatever reason, the police department/the DA decided to charge him with a felony, not the school. They have no power to do such a thing. To charge someone with a felony means he broke the law; the school rules are one thing, the law is another. Why the DA didn't charge the teachers, who knows. Why don't you find that out. The attempt to try to point the finger for this at the school is ludicrous. They were following procedure they have to follow in reporting this to the police. They don't have a choice to exempt one student as opposed to another, no matter who the student is. If they only targeted certain students who brought guns to school, you'd be attacking the school for being predjudiced against them. This thread is all about being pro-gun and nothing about reason or logic.
CaféAuLait;7183535 said:A felony on his record ( he was charged since the admin overheard him calling him mother when he called her to come get the weapon he forgot) will indeed affect his life. A felony his assistant principal, another teacher and a cop were not charged with when they allowed kids to get a loaded weapon out of the principals car and play with it and or bring a loaded weapon onto school property. None were charged only suspended for two days with pay.
Being charged is not being convicted. It is highly doubtful he will be convicted of a felony. If it is a first offense, and would be if he is such a good boy as he is painted, it will be reduced to a misdeanor and he will get some kind of slap on the hand. Again, you are trying to make much ado about essentially nothing. And keep in mind, it is not the school that makes law enforcement charges, it is the police department. For whatever reason, the police department/the DA decided to charge him with a felony, not the school. They have no power to do such a thing. To charge someone with a felony means he broke the law; the school rules are one thing, the law is another. Why the DA didn't charge the teachers, who knows. Why don't you find that out. The attempt to try to point the finger for this at the school is ludicrous. They were following procedure they have to follow in reporting this to the police. They don't have a choice to exempt one student as opposed to another, no matter who the student is. If they only targeted certain students who brought guns to school, you'd be attacking the school for being predjudiced against them. This thread is all about being pro-gun and nothing about reason or logic.
How many thousands of dollars will that set him and his parents back?
And you really think the school has no choice? Seriously? They have moved his suspension all over the board!
This thread is about a school overreacting and the left pretending it is all fair. Felony or misdemeanor, this kid will pay dearly. Of course if he gets jail time, he'll become a Democrat, will never get a good job and live off the state. Win/win for you.
Zero sympathy here forgot and guns do not go together.
With gun ownership comes responsibility, and part of that responsibility is knowing gun laws, policies, rules, and regulations.
Its better he learn a hard lesson at a young age.
Lets hope this will compel him to never forget about a gun again.
'Not allowed to graduate' simply means he won't be allowed to participate in the graduation ceremonies; it does not mean he won't get his diploma--he will still have his high school record of graduating with honors, etc. If he, indeed, is an honor student with a great high school record and GPA, he will have already applied to and been admitted to the university of his choice, or one of them, so this will in no way affect his future or anything about his life in the long term, except that he, hopefully, will learn a lesson about 'forgetting' where a gun is that he is responsible for. All this means is he won't take part in graduation ceremonies. Not a big deal in the long run. Not a big deal at all.
This is another instance of the anti-gun control people trying to make 'much ado about nothing.'
Even a misdemeanor on your record can limit your job opportunities. The school over reacted. At first they were going to expel him, then suspend him for a year, now they are going to let him graduate but not attend the ceremony. That's a heck of a lot of back pedaling. They better drop the felony charges as well. Face it, the school made a mistake in this case and they attempted to ruin a boys life. We can only guess why?
Nothing should have been made of this at all. If they hadn't been listening to his phone call, no one would have been the wiser. All this because he tried to do the right thing. All he's learned is that if he does something wrong, he better keep it to himself and that their are spies everywhere. You could forgive him for becoming paranoid over this for the rest of his life.
Another reason to home school your kids. The public schools are damaging our children, they aren't giving them an education that anyone really wants their kids to have. Big deal, so they know how to toe the line and keep their heads down, is that what we really want for the future leaders of our society?
Being charged is not being convicted. It is highly doubtful he will be convicted of a felony. If it is a first offense, and would be if he is such a good boy as he is painted, it will be reduced to a misdeanor and he will get some kind of slap on the hand. Again, you are trying to make much ado about essentially nothing. And keep in mind, it is not the school that makes law enforcement charges, it is the police department. For whatever reason, the police department/the DA decided to charge him with a felony, not the school. They have no power to do such a thing. To charge someone with a felony means he broke the law; the school rules are one thing, the law is another. Why the DA didn't charge the teachers, who knows. Why don't you find that out. The attempt to try to point the finger for this at the school is ludicrous. They were following procedure they have to follow in reporting this to the police. They don't have a choice to exempt one student as opposed to another, no matter who the student is. If they only targeted certain students who brought guns to school, you'd be attacking the school for being predjudiced against them. This thread is all about being pro-gun and nothing about reason or logic.
How many thousands of dollars will that set him and his parents back?
And you really think the school has no choice? Seriously? They have moved his suspension all over the board!
This thread is about a school overreacting and the left pretending it is all fair. Felony or misdemeanor, this kid will pay dearly. Of course if he gets jail time, he'll become a Democrat, will never get a good job and live off the state. Win/win for you.
If it is against the law to bring a firearm onto school property, then, yes, the school has no option but to report it to the police. The are obligated to do so. If it costs him a lot of money to defend himself, he will learn not to break the law. As far as his suspension from school and not being allowed to participate in school activities, including graduation ceremonies, I imagine that is following school rules and procedures, which, again, they cannot make exceptions about if those rules are to be taken seriously by all of the students now and in the future. He wont' get jail time and most likely will not be convicted of a felony. So you are making a big issue out of nothing. The laws are in place because of things bad people have done. All laws are in place because of those who do bad things, but we all have to obey those laws. That's what a civilized society does. If you make a stupid, irresponsible mistake that breaks the law, you pay for it, just like anyone else.
Being charged is not being convicted. It is highly doubtful he will be convicted of a felony. If it is a first offense, and would be if he is such a good boy as he is painted, it will be reduced to a misdeanor and he will get some kind of slap on the hand. Again, you are trying to make much ado about essentially nothing. And keep in mind, it is not the school that makes law enforcement charges, it is the police department. For whatever reason, the police department/the DA decided to charge him with a felony, not the school. They have no power to do such a thing. To charge someone with a felony means he broke the law; the school rules are one thing, the law is another. Why the DA didn't charge the teachers, who knows. Why don't you find that out. The attempt to try to point the finger for this at the school is ludicrous. They were following procedure they have to follow in reporting this to the police. They don't have a choice to exempt one student as opposed to another, no matter who the student is. If they only targeted certain students who brought guns to school, you'd be attacking the school for being predjudiced against them. This thread is all about being pro-gun and nothing about reason or logic.
How many thousands of dollars will that set him and his parents back?
And you really think the school has no choice? Seriously? They have moved his suspension all over the board!
This thread is about a school overreacting and the left pretending it is all fair. Felony or misdemeanor, this kid will pay dearly. Of course if he gets jail time, he'll become a Democrat, will never get a good job and live off the state. Win/win for you.
If it is against the law to bring a firearm onto school property, then, yes, the school has no option but to report it to the police. The are obligated to do so. If it costs him a lot of money to defend himself, he will learn not to break the law. As far as his suspension from school and not being allowed to participate in school activities, including graduation ceremonies, I imagine that is following school rules and procedures, which, again, they cannot make exceptions about if those rules are to be taken seriously by all of the students now and in the future. He wont' get jail time and most likely will not be convicted of a felony. So you are making a big issue out of nothing. The laws are in place because of things bad people have done. All laws are in place because of those who do bad things, but we all have to obey those laws. That's what a civilized society does. If you make a stupid, irresponsible mistake that breaks the law, you pay for it, just like anyone else.
says (in relevant part):JOHNSTON COUNTY SCHOOLS
Section 4000 - STUDENTS
Policy Code: 4200 Code of Student Conduct
35. Possession or Use of a Firearm Possessing, handling, using, transferring or bringing a firearm onto educational property, or to a school-sponsored curricular or extracurricular activity off of educational property.
Consequence(s):
A student who brings a firearm onto school property shall be suspended for 365 calendar days unless the superintendent recommends placement in an alternative program approved by the Board of Education. Expulsion may be recommended if the student is fourteen years of age or older. (G.S. 115C-390.10) .
-- GS_14-269.2§ 14‑269.2. Weapons on campus or other educational property.
(a) The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Educational property. Any school building or bus, school campus, grounds, recreational area, athletic field, or other property owned, used, or operated by any board of education or school board of trustees, or directors for the administration of any school.
* * * *
(1b) School. A public or private school, community college, college, or university.
(2) Student. A person enrolled in a school or a person who has been suspended or expelled within the last five years from a school, whether the person is an adult or a minor.
* * * *
(4) Weapon. Any device enumerated in subsection (b), (b1), or (d) of this section.
(b) It shall be a Class I felony for any person knowingly to possess or carry, whether openly or concealed, any gun, rifle, pistol, or other firearm of any kind on educational property or to a curricular or extracurricular activity sponsored by a school. Unless the conduct is covered under some other provision of law providing greater punishment, any person who willfully discharges a firearm of any kind on educational property is guilty of a Class F felony. However, this subsection does not apply to a BB gun, stun gun, air rifle, or air pistol.
How many thousands of dollars will that set him and his parents back?
And you really think the school has no choice? Seriously? They have moved his suspension all over the board!
This thread is about a school overreacting and the left pretending it is all fair. Felony or misdemeanor, this kid will pay dearly. Of course if he gets jail time, he'll become a Democrat, will never get a good job and live off the state. Win/win for you.
If it is against the law to bring a firearm onto school property, then, yes, the school has no option but to report it to the police. The are obligated to do so. If it costs him a lot of money to defend himself, he will learn not to break the law. As far as his suspension from school and not being allowed to participate in school activities, including graduation ceremonies, I imagine that is following school rules and procedures, which, again, they cannot make exceptions about if those rules are to be taken seriously by all of the students now and in the future. He wont' get jail time and most likely will not be convicted of a felony. So you are making a big issue out of nothing. The laws are in place because of things bad people have done. All laws are in place because of those who do bad things, but we all have to obey those laws. That's what a civilized society does. If you make a stupid, irresponsible mistake that breaks the law, you pay for it, just like anyone else.
Big "if."
Does the "law" there prohibit bringing a gun on to school property?
Or does the law make it illegal to do so KNOWINGLY?
The SCHOOL's policy, says (in relevant part):35. Possession or Use of a Firearm – Possessing, handling, using, transferring or bringing a firearm onto educational property, or to a school-sponsored curricular or extracurricular activity off of educational property.
Consequence(s):
A student who brings a firearm onto school property shall be suspended for 365 calendar days unless the superintendent recommends placement in an alternative program approved by the Board of Education. Expulsion may be recommended if the student is fourteen years of age or older. (G.S. 115C-390.10) .
But the North Carolina LAW seems to REQUIRE that it be "knowingly"
-- GS_14-269.2§ 14‑269.2. Weapons on campus or other educational property.
(a) The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Educational property. – Any school building or bus, school campus, grounds, recreational area, athletic field, or other property owned, used, or operated by any board of education or school board of trustees, or directors for the administration of any school.
* * * *
(1b) School. – A public or private school, community college, college, or university.
(2) Student. – A person enrolled in a school or a person who has been suspended or expelled within the last five years from a school, whether the person is an adult or a minor.
* * * *
(4) Weapon. – Any device enumerated in subsection (b), (b1), or (d) of this section.
(b) It shall be a Class I felony for any person knowingly to possess or carry, whether openly or concealed, any gun, rifle, pistol, or other firearm of any kind on educational property or to a curricular or extracurricular activity sponsored by a school. Unless the conduct is covered under some other provision of law providing greater punishment, any person who willfully discharges a firearm of any kind on educational property is guilty of a Class F felony. However, this subsection does not apply to a BB gun, stun gun, air rifle, or air pistol.
If it is against the law to bring a firearm onto school property, then, yes, the school has no option but to report it to the police. The are obligated to do so. If it costs him a lot of money to defend himself, he will learn not to break the law. As far as his suspension from school and not being allowed to participate in school activities, including graduation ceremonies, I imagine that is following school rules and procedures, which, again, they cannot make exceptions about if those rules are to be taken seriously by all of the students now and in the future. He wont' get jail time and most likely will not be convicted of a felony. So you are making a big issue out of nothing. The laws are in place because of things bad people have done. All laws are in place because of those who do bad things, but we all have to obey those laws. That's what a civilized society does. If you make a stupid, irresponsible mistake that breaks the law, you pay for it, just like anyone else.
Big "if."
Does the "law" there prohibit bringing a gun on to school property?
Or does the law make it illegal to do so KNOWINGLY?
The SCHOOL's policy, says (in relevant part):
But the North Carolina LAW seems to REQUIRE that it be "knowingly"
-- GS_14-269.2§ 14‑269.2. Weapons on campus or other educational property.
(a) The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Educational property. – Any school building or bus, school campus, grounds, recreational area, athletic field, or other property owned, used, or operated by any board of education or school board of trustees, or directors for the administration of any school.
* * * *
(1b) School. – A public or private school, community college, college, or university.
(2) Student. – A person enrolled in a school or a person who has been suspended or expelled within the last five years from a school, whether the person is an adult or a minor.
* * * *
(4) Weapon. – Any device enumerated in subsection (b), (b1), or (d) of this section.
(b) It shall be a Class I felony for any person knowingly to possess or carry, whether openly or concealed, any gun, rifle, pistol, or other firearm of any kind on educational property or to a curricular or extracurricular activity sponsored by a school. Unless the conduct is covered under some other provision of law providing greater punishment, any person who willfully discharges a firearm of any kind on educational property is guilty of a Class F felony. However, this subsection does not apply to a BB gun, stun gun, air rifle, or air pistol.
Of course he did it knowingly. Just because he temporarily forgot it was in the car, that does not mean he didn't know it was there. He knew it was there, he just wasn't thinking. For example, I got on a plane once with my carry on bag full of expensive cosmetics I'd bought while traveling. I knew the law and I knew it wasn't allowed in carry on bags, but I 'forgot' temporarily because I had a lot of other things on my mind. They pulled me aside and opened the bag. The security person was a woman and realized this was very expensive cosmetics (bottles of skin care treatments), so she didn't want to dump it. She allowed me to check the bag in and have it go cargo w/o the extra cost because it was a small bag. But, I got a lecture about what was allowed and what wasn't. I knew what was allowed, I just wasn't thinking. And that's just cosmetics. How can someone forget a gun? Especially considering all the campus shootings in the US. IMO it is pretty hard for something like that to slip one's mind. So, he knew it was there; I knew the cosmetics were there, and the airline would have been within their rights to dump all of it if they chose to.
As far as the school punishment, it looks like that is mandated by the school board, so, again, the principal had no option but to follow the rules.