Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
I understand your delusion is that only Heartland Institute related folks are trustworthy and above reproach..Scientist are all sell outs and fraudulent ...sure sure ...Consensus? Consensus of who, and how many of the actual number of the total? Total of the minute number of those they poll is not a total concensus. It is a manipulated consensus, just as the data is manipulated. I know you know this, therefore you must be one of the ones that benefits from the manipulations.The problem is Scientific American and Scientist disagree with you...you can disagree with me all you want the problem is you all disagree with Science...If I am you all I would write a paper destroying Scientific consensus OK go ahead do it ..LOLThat's the same anti-science thinking that kept the Flat Earth Society in business for so long
Keep posting your "Lord Mockton" and your Anthony Watt LOL
About that consensus on global warming: 9136 agree, one disagrees.
By Ashutosh Jogalekar|January 10, 2014
|
103
The consensus about global warming among scientists (Image: James Powell)
I just want to highlight this illuminating infographic by James Powell in which, based on more than 2000 peer-reviewed publications, he counts the number of authors from November, 2012 to December, 2013 who explicitly deny global warming (that is, who propose a fundamentally different reason for temperature rise than anthropogenic CO2). The number is exactly one. In addition Powell also has helpful links to the abstracts and main text bodies of the relevant papers.
Not even a single fact... just adhominems and conjecture... Given the empirical evidence one could assert, with fairly high confidence, that Depotoo is correct in his assumption...