'Duck Dynasty' Under Fire Following Star's Incendiary Anti-Gay Remarks


Free speech is obviously only accepted by liberals when it's speech they can agree with.

Like Bashir saying in a preplanned statement that Palin should be whipped, have her mouth defecated in and her eyes and mouth pissed in.

Apparently to libs that's just fine and dandy.

Since I have been backing Phil through this whole thread, you might want to rethink the broad brush you've chosen.

I don't consider you a liberal. I categorize carefully.

To me you are truly an independent. You follow your own path. A rare breed indeed.

:eusa_angel:

ETA: Many people claim to be independent when they are just wishy washy. You are never wishy washy.

:lol:
 
Last edited:
Free speech is obviously only accepted by liberals when it's speech they can agree with.

Like Bashir saying in a preplanned statement that Palin should be whipped, have her mouth defecated in and her eyes and mouth pissed in.

Apparently to libs that's just fine and dandy.

Since I have been backing Phil through this whole thread, you might want to rethink the broad brush you've chosen.

I don't consider you a liberal. I categorize carefully.

To me you are truly an independent. You follow your own path. A rare breed indeed.

:eusa_angel:

ETA: Many people claim to be independent when they are just wishy washy. You are never wishy washy.

:lol:

See, I never took those tests or anything. I think you may be right - but I'd have to actually try to figure it out. :) Thanks, TD!
 
As the apparent only member of the LGBT community big n bad enough to be open about it (holds up thumb and forefinger threatening to squish the head of anyone who mouths off about it heh) I have to say sexual orientation is in fact a choice. Who you're attracted to is the result of conditioning. No gene short-circuits your free will turning you into an automoton. Who you pursue a relationship with, is the result of you making a choice. Being straight doesn't not prevent you from getting drunk one night and orally copulating another guy. Though impaired, you made a choice.

But sexuality isn't a binary state. Just because you say you're straight, doesn't mean given the right circumstance or opportunity you wouldn't have a gay liason. Or in the case of porn, do gay porn for a ton of money (most gay porn actors are actually straight and only 'gay for pay'.) Consequently, the act of having sex doesn't define your sexuality. And the term sexual orientatio is itself a figure of speech. Until coined, people had sex with whom ever they wanted to. But we just love categorizing things, and since some can't accept the fact that they have it within themselves to have gay sex too, gays must be just gay, and straights must be just straight.

Sorry, no. 1's and 6's on the Kinsey scale will become 2's or 5's in prison 'making due.' Orientation can change instantly because of enviroment and opportunity. But it's always a choice people make.

The question itself is phrased badly. Because some are attracted to blondes, some to their own sex, it's the result of conditioning. But there's no gene that takes away free will.

Gays and straights alike make a choice to pursue those relationships. But they can both make different choices at will. Believing they can't is simply wrong.
 
A&E is privately owned so has every right to censor as they see fit.

Just as Americans have every right to decline to watch but, in addition, have the right to boycott sponsors of A&E programming. Flaw in that is they'd have to watch A&E to know who's advertising.

Phil's comments were not broadcast on A&E. He answered a question from a GQ interviewer...and he has been paraphrased into appearing bigoted when he is definitely NOT!

A&E fucked up...big time! A&E promotes other shows that are far more socially INCORRECT than what Phil said.

Irrelevant.

He represents the network regardless the venue of his speech.

And the network made a decision it considered to be in its best interest.
 
As the apparent only member of the LGBT community big n bad enough to be open about it (holds up thumb and forefinger threatening to squish the head of anyone who mouths off about it heh) I have to say sexual orientation is in fact a choice. Who you're attracted to is the result of conditioning. No gene short-circuits your free will turning you into an automoton. Who you pursue a relationship with, is the result of you making a choice. Being straight doesn't not prevent you from getting drunk one night and orally copulating another guy. Though impaired, you made a choice.

But sexuality isn't a binary state. Just because you say you're straight, doesn't mean given the right circumstance or opportunity you wouldn't have a gay liason. Or in the case of porn, do gay porn for a ton of money (most gay porn actors are actually straight and only 'gay for pay'.) Consequently, the act of having sex doesn't define your sexuality. And the term sexual orientatio is itself a figure of speech. Until coined, people had sex with whom ever they wanted to. But we just love categorizing things, and since some can't accept the fact that they have it within themselves to have gay sex too, gays must be just gay, and straights must be just straight.

Sorry, no. 1's and 6's on the Kinsey scale will become 2's or 5's in prison 'making due.' Orientation can change instantly because of enviroment and opportunity. But it's always a choice people make.

The question itself is phrased badly. Because some are attracted to blondes, some to their own sex, it's the result of conditioning. But there's no gene that takes away free will.

Gays and straights alike make a choice to pursue those relationships. But they can both make different choices at will. Believing they can't is simply wrong.

That's the biggest load of hooie I have heard in a very long time.

Yes, sexuality has a certain degree of fluidity. Everybody is somewhere on the spectrum. You're almost certainly bi. I am straight. My sister is a lesbian. She's not going to be exploring her sexuality any time soon, nor am I.

And I doubt that the bulk of this board will, either. But most will pat you on the back for giving them this ammo you just provided.
 
I am bisexual.

Just because you say something, doesn't mean your choice and actions may say something else down the road. Just because I say I'm bisexual doesn't mean if I have a gay lover I can't say I'm gay. For all intents and purposes, I would be. Just the same as if having a straight lover I might say I'm straight. The terms don't mean anyting because they're not absolute or binding. I can change how I describe myself at will. Just like you and your sister could. If you got really drunk and wanted to see what all the fuss was about one night at a party, you might choose to make-out with another girl. Same thing with your sister.

Curiousity causes people to do many things they didn't think they ever would be it sex, drugs, etc.
 
A&E is privately owned so has every right to censor as they see fit.

Just as Americans have every right to decline to watch but, in addition, have the right to boycott sponsors of A&E programming. Flaw in that is they'd have to watch A&E to know who's advertising.

Phil's comments were not broadcast on A&E. He answered a question from a GQ interviewer...and he has been paraphrased into appearing bigoted when he is definitely NOT!

A&E fucked up...big time! A&E promotes other shows that are far more socially INCORRECT than what Phil said.

Irrelevant.

He represents the network regardless the venue of his speech.

And the network made a decision it considered to be in its best interest.

Oh bite me. Robertson doesn't represent the network. A&E made a business decision that was foolhardy and rash.

Like BD Boop suggested all they had to do was come out and clearly state that Robertson was speaking only on behalf of his own beliefs.

I mean what next? The Pope is against abortion and same sex marriages so are networks not going to carry his Christmas Day message from the Vatican?

Are we really going to try to push PC that far? It wouldn't surprise me.
 
I am straight. In no way, EVER, would "curiosity" send me to the arms of a woman. Just...ewww. And I'm pretty damn sure the majority of men here that are straight would say the same EWWWW and never had an ounce of "curiosity" about another man's anus.
Curiosity? Um Ok. Do you wonder what poop tastes like and act on it?
 
Last edited:
I am bisexual.

Just because you say something, doesn't mean your choice and actions may say something else down the road. Just because I say I'm bisexual doesn't mean if I have a gay lover I can't say I'm gay. For all intents and purposes, I would be. Just the same as if having a straight lover I might say I'm straight. The terms don't mean anyting because they're not absolute or binding. I can change how I describe myself at will. Just like you and your sister could. If you got really drunk and wanted to see what all the fuss was about one night at a party, you might choose to make-out with another girl. Same thing with your sister.

Curiousity causes people to do many things they didn't think they ever would be it sex, drugs, etc.

That does not make one anything other than bi-curious.

I did exactly what you referenced.

My sister has a son.

She is a lesbian, I am straight and since we're both in our mid-50's, we won't be playing any reindeer games, thanks.

How do you explain this?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe58_vd_5g4]Brain scan results - Making of Me: John Barrowman - BBC - YouTube[/ame]

Shouldn't he have a different reading, based on your beliefs?
 
But he doesn't hold those views anymore. That's the point pinhead.

Did that have to be explained? Remember, Reagan thought Social Security was beginning of the end of this country. Yet he ended up supporting it.

The difference is we all knew Obama was lying (again) when he said at the time he thought marriag, e was between a man and a woman. He always supported gay marriage, he just couldnt say it at the time because he didnt want to piss off his other base, religious blacks. They wouldn't have voted for someone else, but they may have stayed home, and that would have been a problem.

You all knew Obama was lying? Just somehow "knew"?

well he was opening his mouth.
 
I learned a couple of things moments ago that set this whole DD crap on it's ear.

First is that the next season has already been shot and will air in a week or two, Phil Robertson of course will still be on it. Secondly, they won't start filming the season after that for another 4-5 months.

Here's what's going to happen. A&E will "suspend" Mr. Robertson for 4-5 months and then claim that he's learned his lesson or some shit and he'll be back in time to film the new season.

Don't doubt me.

For that matter, it wouldn't surprise me if the whole thing were nothing but a publicity stunt. I find it hard to believe that the company would create this show to highlight the crazy things this guy says, then "suspend" him for saying something crazy.

How is quoting scripture in a question about his beliefs crazy?
 
No, I have wondered if all of this isn't a big play for publicity for the show. Look at that guy, who would be surprised he thinks this way? I had heard of this reality tv show vaguely but it's all I'm hearing about this week. Reruns are still playing on A&E but I think I'll pass.
 
phil-robertson-duck-dynasty-618x400.jpg


'Duck Dynasty' family releases statement

Dec. 19, 2013, 10:06 PM EST
By Tim Kenneally
TheWrap

...

In the statement, posted on the Duck Commander website, the family says that it "cannot imagine" going forward with the show if Phil isn't aboard, and that it's "in discussions" with A&E to determine what his suspension means for the future of the show.

In the statement, the family asserted that Phil "would never incite or encourage hate" and that they were "disappointed" in the suspension.

Also on TheWrap: 'Duck Dynasty' Fallout: GLAAD Reeling From Biggest Backlash in Years, Says Rep

They also said that Phil's expression of his faith is his "constitutionally protected right."

Read the full statement below.

"We want to thank all of you for your prayers and support. The family has spent much time in prayer since learning of A&E's decision. We want you to know that first and foremost we are a family rooted in our faith in God and our belief that the Bible is His word. While some of Phil's unfiltered comments to the reporter were coarse, his beliefs are grounded in the teachings of the Bible. Phil is a Godly man who follows what the Bible says are the greatest commandments: 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart' and 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' Phil would never incite or encourage hate.We are disappointed that Phil has been placed on hiatus for expressing his faith, which is his constitutionally protected right. We have had a successful working relationship with A&E but, as a family, we cannot imagine the show going forward without our patriarch at the helm. We are in discussions with A&E to see what that means for the future of 'Duck Dynasty.' Again, thank you for your continued support of our family."

'Duck Dynasty' clan 'cannot imagine' doing show without Phil Robertson - MSN TV News



Petition launched to reinstate 'Duck Dynasty' star

Dec. 19, 2013, 2:30 PM EST
Entertainment Tonight.
...
Petition launched to reinstate 'Duck Dynasty' star - MSN TV News
 
Real Christians are not at all bothered by Duck problems at all.

It is an employer employment issue, not a 1st Amendment issue.

If you disagree then don't watch.

I would say that I am a consumer and therefore have expectations.

Jake I think it may go deeper than that.
I remember when this quote described how people felt about the freedom this country had to offer. It has ceased to apply. How sad to have lost it:

‘I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it,’

And it is another attack on Christianity. Something Christians have come to expect.
 
Last edited:
No, I have wondered if all of this isn't a big play for publicity for the show. Look at that guy, who would be surprised he thinks this way? I had heard of this reality tv show vaguely but it's all I'm hearing about this week. Reruns are still playing on A&E but I think I'll pass.

The man's a Christian. Who follows the Word. Of course he thinks that way.

And as far as the show goes they don't need publicity :lol:

The show has broken several ratings records on both A&E and cable television as a whole; the fourth season premiere drew 11.8 million viewers, the most-watched nonfiction cable telecast in history

Duck Dynasty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top