Donald Trump Gag Order Upheld

[Marener]

I asked you if the Steele dossier was ever verified You know exactly what I meant

No. Tell me what you meant. Unless you’re too afraid to speak clearly.

 

[WEATHER53]

Laws can’t overrule the constitution.

Not all acts are addressed in the constitution

 

[eagle1462010]

No. Tell me what you meant. Unless you’re too afraid to speak clearly.

Yawn. You know what I meant. Steele.

 

[Marener]

Not all acts are addressed in the constitution

Speech is addressed in the constitution

 

[Road Runner]

Has anybody noticed that Spaz always seems to vanish when I call him out on his bullshit? The last thing that I did was prove he's delusional and he left pages ago.

 

[TNHarley]

According to who?

The constitution.

 

[Marener]

The constitution.

No. According to your interpretation of the constitution.

The courts disagree.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Let me know what any of that has to do with a gag order in a court of law. Right, you can’t, so stop wasting time with your nonsense

Cheer up, it's an injection of humour

 

[TNHarley]

No. According to your interpretation of the constitution.

The courts disagree.

Oh yeah? So where does it say that then?

 

[Marener]

Oh yeah? So where does it say that then?

Loading…

storage.courtlistener.com

 

[TNHarley]

Loading…

storage.courtlistener.com

So you have nothing. lolz

 

[Marener]

So you have nothing. lolz

So you are illiterate.

 

[TNHarley]

So you are illiterate.

Im not fucking reading that. I read the first three pages and it didnt even mention the constitution. So I assume you did, so you can point me to the relevant parts, right?

 

[Marener]

Im not fucking reading that. I read the first three pages and it didnt even mention the constitution. So I assume you did, so you can point me to the relevant parts, right?

So when you say that I “have nothing”, the truth is that you don’t have the foggiest idea what I have because you’re too goddamn lazy to read the decision.

 

[TNHarley]

So when you say that I “have nothing”, the truth is that you don’t have the foggiest idea what I have because you’re too goddamn lazy to read the decision.

So you found the link and read it in 6 minutes?
And cant point out the relevant part. Mkay

 

[Marener]

So you found the link and read it in 6 minutes?
And cant point out the relevant part. Mkay

I read it a few days ago when the decision came out.

What part of the constitution says you can’t yell fire in a crowded theatre?

 

[TNHarley]

I read it a few days ago when the decision came out.

What part of the constitution says you can’t yell fire in a crowded theatre?

So now we move away from your link. Mkay

 

[Marener]

So now we move away from your link. Mkay

I’m trying to dumb it down for you.

The court decision rests on SCOTUS precedent where they balance the right to free speech with the right to a fair trial.

 

[TNHarley]

I’m trying to dumb it down for you.

The court decision rests on SCOTUS precedent where they balance the right to free speech with the right to a fair trial.

I understand that.
Where does a judge get the authority from the constitution to decide which right is more important?

 

[Marener]

I understand that.
Where does a judge get the authority from the constitution to decide which right is more important?

That’s the purpose of the judiciary. To decide these things.