NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Apparently the birthers have a new toy.
Are you trying to say all the leaks are lies?
Are you trying to remind us that you can't read and think at the same time?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Apparently the birthers have a new toy.
Are you trying to say all the leaks are lies?
Fax and modem noises? That's actually pretty good. If only you had turned that suggestion in to a numbered item and linked to something that would have been perfect.
Had you contributed an actual thought in any of your posts....I sincerely doubt that the word 'perfect' would have entered the discussion.
Sadly you probably don't realize that folks you deal with in your real life recognize the jejune nature of your blather as well.
I don't think you have any clue what 'real life' entails.
Apparently the birthers have a new toy.
Did you just appear in the hope that I would inadvertently use the word 'think' in connection with your post???
Not likely.
The OP is gibberish. The OP is the kind of thing that causes USMB conservatives to spend suspiciously long times in the bathroom with their laptops.
Is there even one conservative here rational enough to acknowledge the simple fact that the specifics of these so-called leaks are not of a nature that even help the President poltically?
Therefore he had NO MOTIVE to leak the classified information.
Leaking information on assassination plots? Before that was even discussed as a leak, it was being used by left AND right to attack the President;
how would leaking information about that help the President?
either the NY Times is wrong or Obama is.....take your pick
Why can't they both be wrong at the same time? It is not like that has never happened before.
Apparently the birthers have a new toy.
Are you trying to say all the leaks are lies?
Are you trying to remind us that you can't read and think at the same time?
Is there even one conservative here rational enough to acknowledge the simple fact that the specifics of these so-called leaks are not of a nature that even help the President poltically?
Therefore he had NO MOTIVE to leak the classified information.
Leaking information on assassination plots? Before that was even discussed as a leak, it was being used by left AND right to attack the President;
how would leaking information about that help the President?
either the NY Times is wrong or Obama is.....take your pick
Why can't they both be wrong at the same time? It is not like that has never happened before.
and how does that work?
obama is wrong and there ARE classified leaks and the NY Times is wrong that the information came from "top admin. officials"?
Is there even one conservative here rational enough to acknowledge the simple fact that the specifics of these so-called leaks are not of a nature that even help the President poltically?
Therefore he had NO MOTIVE to leak the classified information.
Leaking information on assassination plots? Before that was even discussed as a leak, it was being used by left AND right to attack the President;
how would leaking information about that help the President?
"...the simple fact that the specifics of these so-called leaks are not of a nature that even help the President poltically?"
When I read your post, I shook my head so rapidly, you could blend paint colors in my mouth .
You never learned to question, to look at the underpinings of your less-than-intuitive understanding of geopolitical world views.
There is only one guaranteed cure for your problems: the next time youre playing Donkey Kong, practice bomb disposal at the same time.
Had you contributed an actual thought in any of your posts....I sincerely doubt that the word 'perfect' would have entered the discussion.
Sadly you probably don't realize that folks you deal with in your real life recognize the jejune nature of your blather as well.
I don't think you have any clue what 'real life' entails.
Your post would be essentially true if it ended after the first three words.
Is there even one conservative here rational enough to acknowledge the simple fact that the specifics of these so-called leaks are not of a nature that even help the President poltically?
Therefore he had NO MOTIVE to leak the classified information.
Leaking information on assassination plots? Before that was even discussed as a leak, it was being used by left AND right to attack the President;
how would leaking information about that help the President?
"...the simple fact that the specifics of these so-called leaks are not of a nature that even help the President poltically?"
When I read your post, I shook my head so rapidly, you could blend paint colors in my mouth….
You never learned to question, to look at the underpinings of your less-than-intuitive understanding of geopolitical world views.
There is only one guaranteed cure for your problems: the next time you’re playing Donkey Kong, practice bomb disposal at the same time.
You don't seem to understand that the motive for leaking was supposedly to gain politically.
The material supposedly leaked doesn't help the administration, so the motive isn't there.
The idea that the administration would conspire to leak classified information, thus running the risk of being caught leaking classified information,
when the information leaked served no good purpose,
is absurd.
The material supposedly leaked doesn't help the administration, so the motive isn't there.
I don't think you have any clue what 'real life' entails.
Your post would be essentially true if it ended after the first three words.
Accusing your adversity of your own greatest weakness. That's a classic tactic.
We don't know who is leaking this stuff so I won't accuse the Whitehouse that said this is major stuff getting leaked that only high ranking people would or should know about so it does make you wonder.
Your post would be essentially true if it ended after the first three words.
Accusing your adversity of your own greatest weakness. That's a classic tactic.
My greatest weakness is typing, spelling, and grammar.
Is there even one conservative here rational enough to acknowledge the simple fact that the specifics of these so-called leaks are not of a nature that even help the President poltically?
Therefore he had NO MOTIVE to leak the classified information.
Leaking information on assassination plots? Before that was even discussed as a leak, it was being used by left AND right to attack the President;
how would leaking information about that help the President?
"...the simple fact that the specifics of these so-called leaks are not of a nature that even help the President poltically?"
When I read your post, I shook my head so rapidly, you could blend paint colors in my mouth .
You never learned to question, to look at the underpinings of your less-than-intuitive understanding of geopolitical world views.
There is only one guaranteed cure for your problems: the next time youre playing Donkey Kong, practice bomb disposal at the same time.
You don't seem to understand that the motive for leaking was supposedly to gain politically.
The material supposedly leaked doesn't help the administration, so the motive isn't there.
The idea that the administration would conspire to leak classified information, thus running the risk of being caught leaking classified information,
when the information leaked served no good purpose,
is absurd.
Accusing your adversity of your own greatest weakness. That's a classic tactic.
My greatest weakness is typing, spelling, and grammar.
And your punishment....
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnS49c9KZw8&feature=fvwrel]Comfy Chair - YouTube[/ame]
Is there even one conservative here rational enough to acknowledge the simple fact that the specifics of these so-called leaks are not of a nature that even help the President poltically?
Therefore he had NO MOTIVE to leak the classified information.
Leaking information on assassination plots? Before that was even discussed as a leak, it was being used by left AND right to attack the President;
how would leaking information about that help the President?
"...the simple fact that the specifics of these so-called leaks are not of a nature that even help the President poltically?"
When I read your post, I shook my head so rapidly, you could blend paint colors in my mouth .
You never learned to question, to look at the underpinings of your less-than-intuitive understanding of geopolitical world views.
There is only one guaranteed cure for your problems: the next time youre playing Donkey Kong, practice bomb disposal at the same time.
You don't seem to understand that the motive for leaking was supposedly to gain politically.
The material supposedly leaked doesn't help the administration, so the motive isn't there.
The idea that the administration would conspire to leak classified information, thus running the risk of being caught leaking classified information,
when the information leaked served no good purpose,
is absurd.