Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Tramp is a racist and a bigot. Now you can show me blacks that he lets in the oval office or even that he hires, it doesn't matter, he is a racist bigot.
In your opinion. In my opinion you're a racist bigot. So now what?
Only because I don't give a rip about Israel, you mean?
No, because you want all Jews exterminated.
Just because you are use to the garbage tramp spouts does not make it NOT RACIST.
The media has made it any remark directed against a minorityI grew up in the South during the Civil Rights revolution, and back then the term 'racist' meant that you favored laws and policies that discriminated against individuals because of their race. Therefore, segregation laws and Jim Crow was rightfully viewed as racism, which it was.
Then it began to morph into other things, like policies with disproportionate impact. I noted at the time that the advocates of regarding laws and policies with a disproportionate impact to be all about what favored whites and disadvantaged minorities exclusively. If something had a disproportionate impact against whites and in favor of minorities, well that was OK and everyday Middle Class people began to speak of 'reverse racism', etc which all the talking Heads and Social justice Warriors dismissed with as much condescending scorn as possible. But it still was not 'equal rights' which most felt was the ideal standard for a fair and jkust government.
Now everything is racist if it goes against what our Progressive minority wants done. You want our nations immigration laws enforced; that's racist. You want law and order? That too is racist. You want to verify that only eligible voters can vote, well that is racism, etc, etc.
So what do you think racism is really?
You carry a lot of tard anger which screws with your judgementTramp is a racist and a bigot. Now you can show me blacks that he lets in the oval office or even that he hires, it doesn't matter, he is a racist bigot.
We also give Egypt a similar amount of cash, but no one complains about that.Because they are a lone nation of reason in an unreasonable part of the world...Jews I take individually, Israel I don't care about but I have yet to see why they are not independent and still receive aid of US 3.8 billion bucks a year.
So racism is entirely subjective to the viewer?How can it not be racism if you consider a group of people to be a race?
Look at Hitler, he considered Slavs to be an inferior race. Thus if he discriminated against Slavs, he was racist. It wouldn't necessarily have to have skin color to back it up, although in the modern world it often does.
Yes, but one of them also has considerably more money.Why is R Kelly
R. Kelly is reportedly being held without bail following his arrest on federal sex charges.
and why isn't Jeffrey Epstein behind bars without bail?
Perfect example.
So racism is entirely subjective to the viewer?How can it not be racism if you consider a group of people to be a race?
Look at Hitler, he considered Slavs to be an inferior race. Thus if he discriminated against Slavs, he was racist. It wouldn't necessarily have to have skin color to back it up, although in the modern world it often does.
I don't think that is helping clarify what racism is, though.
Yes, to the viewer's point of view.So racism is entirely subjective to the viewer?How can it not be racism if you consider a group of people to be a race?
Look at Hitler, he considered Slavs to be an inferior race. Thus if he discriminated against Slavs, he was racist. It wouldn't necessarily have to have skin color to back it up, although in the modern world it often does.
I don't think that is helping clarify what racism is, though.
Actually I wouldn't say the viewer's point of view, depending on what you mean by viewer. But if someone dislikes a certain group of people he/she considers a race, that would imply racism.Yes, to the viewer's point of view.So racism is entirely subjective to the viewer?How can it not be racism if you consider a group of people to be a race?
Look at Hitler, he considered Slavs to be an inferior race. Thus if he discriminated against Slavs, he was racist. It wouldn't necessarily have to have skin color to back it up, although in the modern world it often does.
I don't think that is helping clarify what racism is, though.
If you have a simpler idea of what it is, post it for debate.
I grew up in the South during the Civil Rights revolution, and back then the term 'racist' meant that you favored laws and policies that discriminated against individuals because of their race. Therefore, segregation laws and Jim Crow was rightfully viewed as racism, which it was.
Then it began to morph into other things, like policies with disproportionate impact. I noted at the time that the advocates of regarding laws and policies with a disproportionate impact to be all about what favored whites and disadvantaged minorities exclusively. If something had a disproportionate impact against whites and in favor of minorities, well that was OK and everyday Middle Class people began to speak of 'reverse racism', etc which all the talking Heads and Social justice Warriors dismissed with as much condescending scorn as possible. But it still was not 'equal rights' which most felt was the ideal standard for a fair and jkust government.
Now everything is racist if it goes against what our Progressive minority wants done. You want our nations immigration laws enforced; that's racist. You want law and order? That too is racist. You want to verify that only eligible voters can vote, well that is racism, etc, etc.
So what do you think racism is really?
What laws and polices disadvantaged whites over minorities as you claim?
Yep. We actually PAY Egypt and the "Palestinians" to behave themselves. We basically loan Israel money which they use for the most part to buy defensive weapons from us because they are surrounded by rabid sharks.We also give Egypt a similar amount of cash, but no one complains about that.Because they are a lone nation of reason in an unreasonable part of the world...Jews I take individually, Israel I don't care about but I have yet to see why they are not independent and still receive aid of US 3.8 billion bucks a year.
I grew up in the South during the Civil Rights revolution, and back then the term 'racist' meant that you favored laws and policies that discriminated against individuals because of their race. Therefore, segregation laws and Jim Crow was rightfully viewed as racism, which it was.
Then it began to morph into other things, like policies with disproportionate impact. I noted at the time that the advocates of regarding laws and policies with a disproportionate impact to be all about what favored whites and disadvantaged minorities exclusively. If something had a disproportionate impact against whites and in favor of minorities, well that was OK and everyday Middle Class people began to speak of 'reverse racism', etc which all the talking Heads and Social justice Warriors dismissed with as much condescending scorn as possible. But it still was not 'equal rights' which most felt was the ideal standard for a fair and jkust government.
Now everything is racist if it goes against what our Progressive minority wants done. You want our nations immigration laws enforced; that's racist. You want law and order? That too is racist. You want to verify that only eligible voters can vote, well that is racism, etc, etc.
So what do you think racism is really?
What laws and polices disadvantaged whites over minorities as you claim?
Uhhhhh......affirmative action ring a bell dumbshit?
I grew up in the South during the Civil Rights revolution, and back then the term 'racist' meant that you favored laws and policies that discriminated against individuals because of their race. Therefore, segregation laws and Jim Crow was rightfully viewed as racism, which it was.
Then it began to morph into other things, like policies with disproportionate impact. I noted at the time that the advocates of regarding laws and policies with a disproportionate impact to be all about what favored whites and disadvantaged minorities exclusively. If something had a disproportionate impact against whites and in favor of minorities, well that was OK and everyday Middle Class people began to speak of 'reverse racism', etc which all the talking Heads and Social justice Warriors dismissed with as much condescending scorn as possible. But it still was not 'equal rights' which most felt was the ideal standard for a fair and jkust government.
Now everything is racist if it goes against what our Progressive minority wants done. You want our nations immigration laws enforced; that's racist. You want law and order? That too is racist. You want to verify that only eligible voters can vote, well that is racism, etc, etc.
So what do you think racism is really?
What laws and polices disadvantaged whites over minorities as you claim?
Uhhhhh......affirmative action ring a bell dumbshit?
So having 2 positions out of 100 filled by minorities hurts white people?
And I really don't think Jim Crow states had any policies or laws of affirmative action.
