Does anyone else see the hypocrisy?

The Tea Party today is the equivalent of the Loyalists in 1775. Both groups look to the past instead of the future. I don't necessarily question the patriotism of the far right conloons, just their myopia and shortness of stride.
 
The Tea Party today is the equivalent of the Loyalists in 1775. Both groups look to the past instead of the future. I don't necessarily question the patriotism of the far right conloons, just their myopia and shortness of stride.
The Democratic Party today is the equivalent of the Bolsheviks of October 1917. Both groups embrace socialism and centralized power as the cure for all ills. I don't necessarily question the sanity of the far left commies, just their myopia and lack of intellect.
 
I am pro-life. The argument that the liberal pro-choicers go on and on about is that abortion is about choice, (key word). A woman's body is her choice in any decision. Whether she carries a baby to term or not. Choice!! So we are up to speed on that, right? Healthcare reform. So you can go to jail for refusing to purchase healthcare. When one gets sick, they MUST have healthcare to take care of their body. Where does choice fall in here? So choice only works when liberals say it does?

So, you're not pro-choice on abortion, but you want people to have choice on whether they have healthcare coverage...

...that would also make you a hypocrite by your own standard.



And yet, you still can't answer the question from the liberal perspective. Where does "choice" play a part in healthcare? Here's a quick answer, it doesn't. Not everybody is required to get auto insurance. So why should everybody be required to purchase health insurance?

Not everyone drives a car, but everyone can be hit by one, or break a leg, get an infection, etc. etc.
Are RWers so stupid they don't get the difference between an apple and a unicorn?
 
The Tea Party today is the equivalent of the Loyalists in 1775. Both groups look to the past instead of the future. I don't necessarily question the patriotism of the far right conloons, just their myopia and shortness of stride.
The Democratic Party today is the equivalent of the Bolsheviks of October 1917. Both groups embrace socialism and centralized power as the cure for all ills. I don't necessarily question the sanity of the far left commies, just their myopia and lack of intellect.

Yeah, right, CharlieS: the Dems are going around and shooting us in the head. Can you be any more inept in your comparisons?
 
I am pro-life. The argument that the liberal pro-choicers go on and on about is that abortion is about choice, (key word). A woman's body is her choice in any decision. Whether she carries a baby to term or not. Choice!! So we are up to speed on that, right? Healthcare reform. So you can go to jail for refusing to purchase healthcare. When one gets sick, they MUST have healthcare to take care of their body. Where does choice fall in here? So choice only works when liberals say it does?

This is a false analogy: apples and oranges. Move on.

Who is paying you to post here, Jake?
 
No one will be going to jail over lack of health insurance Mr. Tempest-n-A-Teapot...get real.
 
So, you're not pro-choice on abortion, but you want people to have choice on whether they have healthcare coverage...

...that would also make you a hypocrite by your own standard.



And yet, you still can't answer the question from the liberal perspective. Where does "choice" play a part in healthcare? Here's a quick answer, it doesn't. Not everybody is required to get auto insurance. So why should everybody be required to purchase health insurance?

Not everyone drives a car, but everyone can be hit by one, or break a leg, get an infection, etc. etc.
Are RWers so stupid they don't get the difference between an apple and a unicorn?

You stopped making sense after this, "Not everyone drives a car..."
 
If you've actually read the ENTIRE bill, word for word and
you're coming back with that nonsense about jailtime...
then you're a bigger DUNCE than I expected.

dunce.jpg
 
Last edited:
If you've actually read the ENTIRE bill, word for word and you're coming back with that nonsense about jailtime...you're a bigger dunce than I expected.

But you haven't read any of it right? You ran to the doctor today for your free health care, amiright?

Have your premiums dropped 3,000%?
 
I am pro-life. The argument that the liberal pro-choicers go on and on about is that abortion is about choice, (key word). A woman's body is her choice in any decision. Whether she carries a baby to term or not. Choice!! So we are up to speed on that, right? Healthcare reform. So you can go to jail for refusing to purchase healthcare. When one gets sick, they MUST have healthcare to take care of their body. Where does choice fall in here? So choice only works when liberals say it does?

This is a false analogy: apples and oranges. Move on.

Who is paying you to post here, Jake?

Communists, Socialists, the DNC, take your pick, Jake supports them all.
 
I voted for McCain and most of the Republicans on the ticket last time, CharlieS. Thanks for thinking that smart people would pay me to try to bring around the conloon right, but that is not the case.

We the GOP will lose if we continue as the Party of Hate, which we seem to be morphing from the Party of No. If you guys keep this up, the great majority of Americans are going to fear the GOP.

Is that what you conloons want?
 
I am pro-life. The argument that the liberal pro-choicers go on and on about is that abortion is about choice, (key word). A woman's body is her choice in any decision. Whether she carries a baby to term or not. Choice!! So we are up to speed on that, right? Healthcare reform. So you can go to jail for refusing to purchase healthcare. When one gets sick, they MUST have healthcare to take care of their body. Where does choice fall in here? So choice only works when liberals say it does?


Why do you hate woman?
 
My published works have made some money, but, no, I don't get paid for doing this.
Oooooh another Internet Author.
Let me guess you are also a female Russian cosmonaut with multiple PhD's and you just got centerfold coverage in Playboy's "Girrrls (sic) of the Russian Space Corp"
Now I understand from whence you come.
 
Not at all, CharlesS. Some of us here have made some money for our published works. That should not threaten you in the slightest, I don't think. If it makes you feel better, my compensated writing does not appear in opinion columns anywhere. This is just "fun" for me as it appears for you as well.
 
And yet, you still can't answer the question from the liberal perspective. Where does "choice" play a part in healthcare? Here's a quick answer, it doesn't. Not everybody is required to get auto insurance. So why should everybody be required to purchase health insurance?

Not everyone drives a car, but everyone can be hit by one, or break a leg, get an infection, etc. etc.
Are RWers so stupid they don't get the difference between an apple and a unicorn?

You stopped making sense after this, "Not everyone drives a car..."

CF, I always make sense, and lots of cents. So continue to spend you life posting idiotgrams, It's time for my quarterly vacation. We are off to Arizona for Spring Training, and then East to New Mexico, or North to the North Rim or West to Death Valley - it all depends on the weather and my wifes interest at the moment.
Now, it is obvious not everyone drives a car, so what point were you hoping to make?
 

Forum List

Back
Top