Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
'deserve'? no, of course notThink about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
No, the business doesn't deserve to be attacked.
Does a business that advertises itself as a gun free zone deserve to be attacked?
Of course not.
On the other hand....
If a business advertises itself as a "Gun Free Zone" and puts up signs forbidding customers from bringing guns inside...
...and some whacko barges in, holds up the customers, and then shoots one....
..should that customer (or his next of kin) sue the business for depriving the customer of his right to defend himself and then failing to protect the unarmed customer, resulting in his injury or death?
Obviously the person most at fault is the whacko who pulled the trigger.
But does the business deserve at least some liability for what happened?
If a business forbids customers the right to carry the means to defend themselves, is the business then responsible for defending them instead?
'deserve'? no, of course notThink about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
being an idiot doesn't mean you deserve to be killed.
lose business? yea, fuck you for being retarded.
No, the business doesn't deserve to be attacked.
Maybe in some abstract sense it doesn't, but in the real world it does.
'deserve'? no, of course notThink about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
being an idiot doesn't mean you deserve to be killed.
lose business? yea, fuck you for being retarded.
The law of nature says being an idiot is a reason you deserve to be killed.
The law of reality says your fascist intentions are not tolerated'deserve'? no, of course notThink about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
being an idiot doesn't mean you deserve to be killed.
lose business? yea, fuck you for being retarded.
The law of nature says being an idiot is a reason you deserve to be killed.
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
'deserve'? no, of course notThink about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
being an idiot doesn't mean you deserve to be killed.
lose business? yea, fuck you for being retarded.
The law of nature says being an idiot is a reason you deserve to be killed.
Does a business that advertises itself as a gun free zone deserve to be attacked?
Of course not.
On the other hand....
If a business advertises itself as a "Gun Free Zone" and puts up signs forbidding customers from bringing guns inside...
...and some whacko barges in, holds up the customers, and then shoots one....
..should that customer (or his next of kin) sue the business for depriving the customer of his right to defend himself and then failing to protect the unarmed customer, resulting in his injury or death?
Obviously the person most at fault is the whacko who pulled the trigger.
But does the business deserve at least some liability for what happened?
If a business forbids customers the right to carry the means to defend themselves, is the business then responsible for defending them instead?
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
Criminals don't give a shit about "gun free zones".
Perhaps a better idea would be "myth free zones".