Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No. Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked. I'm already seeing some childish responses on the subject.
Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked due to the positions the establishment has on guns. So knock it off.
Does a business that advertises itself as a gun free zone deserve to be attacked?
Of course not.
On the other hand....
If a business advertises itself as a "Gun Free Zone" and puts up signs forbidding customers from bringing guns inside...
...and some whacko barges in, holds up the customers, and then shoots one....
..should that customer (or his next of kin) sue the business for depriving the customer of his right to defend himself and then failing to protect the unarmed customer, resulting in his injury or death?
Obviously the person most at fault is the whacko who pulled the trigger.
But does the business deserve at least some liability for what happened?
If a business forbids customers the right to carry the means to defend themselves, is the business then responsible for defending them instead?
We have a customer that has a worker with a part-time job as a CCW instructor. He told me one such case already happened. A man was attacked in the parking lot of a business with one of those signs, and the court ruled in favor of the complainant. I didn't look the case up or anything like that, so I'm assuming this guy knows what he's talking about.[/QUOTE
My second uncle cousin's daughter's aunt's good friend who isn't quite right in the head said that as well.
So with your dumb ass logic, if a person is attacked in a pro gun zone they should blame that. Your extreme idiocy is not helping gun rights advocates.No. Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked. I'm already seeing some childish responses on the subject.
Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked due to the positions the establishment has on guns. So knock it off.
Agreed. Nobody should be attacked for any reason. But if a person is attacked in a gun-free zone, they have to blame themselves at least a little. I don't do business with places that have those signs on the window. That's not to say if I see one of those signs, I'm going to turn around and go home. But I know I won't go back to that business.
So with your dumb ass logic, if a person is attacked in a pro gun zone they should blame that. Your extreme idiocy is not helping gun rights advocates.No. Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked. I'm already seeing some childish responses on the subject.
Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked due to the positions the establishment has on guns. So knock it off.
Agreed. Nobody should be attacked for any reason. But if a person is attacked in a gun-free zone, they have to blame themselves at least a little. I don't do business with places that have those signs on the window. That's not to say if I see one of those signs, I'm going to turn around and go home. But I know I won't go back to that business.
Your position is the same in reverse as someone that would blame a gun friendly zone or allowing carry for a gun crime. You would be better served promoting resposible gun ownership and reasonable carry laws (cant carry everywhere you want). Insisting guns be allowed everywhere is just going to piss people off and portray gun rights advocates as unreasonable.So with your dumb ass logic, if a person is attacked in a pro gun zone they should blame that. Your extreme idiocy is not helping gun rights advocates.No. Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked. I'm already seeing some childish responses on the subject.
Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked due to the positions the establishment has on guns. So knock it off.
Agreed. Nobody should be attacked for any reason. But if a person is attacked in a gun-free zone, they have to blame themselves at least a little. I don't do business with places that have those signs on the window. That's not to say if I see one of those signs, I'm going to turn around and go home. But I know I won't go back to that business.
Idiocy is doing business that has a "WELCOME" sign to criminals. Most people with common sense understand that a criminal will commit crime in the easiest area to do so. Given a choice, a criminal will not elect to pick a place where they may end up injured or dead. They would rather commit crimes in places where everybody is a victim.
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
Criminals don't give a shit about "gun free zones".
Perhaps a better idea would be "myth free zones".
Your position is the same in reverse as someone that would blame a gun friendly zone or allowing carry for a gun crime. You would be better served promoting resposible gun ownership and reasonable carry laws (cant carry everywhere you want). Insisting guns be allowed everywhere is just going to piss people off and portray gun rights advocates as unreasonable.So with your dumb ass logic, if a person is attacked in a pro gun zone they should blame that. Your extreme idiocy is not helping gun rights advocates.No. Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked. I'm already seeing some childish responses on the subject.
Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked due to the positions the establishment has on guns. So knock it off.
Agreed. Nobody should be attacked for any reason. But if a person is attacked in a gun-free zone, they have to blame themselves at least a little. I don't do business with places that have those signs on the window. That's not to say if I see one of those signs, I'm going to turn around and go home. But I know I won't go back to that business.
Idiocy is doing business that has a "WELCOME" sign to criminals. Most people with common sense understand that a criminal will commit crime in the easiest area to do so. Given a choice, a criminal will not elect to pick a place where they may end up injured or dead. They would rather commit crimes in places where everybody is a victim.
No, the business doesn't deserve to be attacked.
Maybe in some abstract sense it doesn't, but in the real world it does.
No, not in any world.
The law of reality says your fascist intentions are not tolerated'deserve'? no, of course notThink about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
being an idiot doesn't mean you deserve to be killed.
lose business? yea, fuck you for being retarded.
The law of nature says being an idiot is a reason you deserve to be killed.
'deserve'? no, of course notThink about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
being an idiot doesn't mean you deserve to be killed.
lose business? yea, fuck you for being retarded.
The law of nature says being an idiot is a reason you deserve to be killed.
You know that you are an idiot, don't you?
Isn't it, though?'deserve'? no, of course notThink about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
being an idiot doesn't mean you deserve to be killed.
lose business? yea, fuck you for being retarded.
The law of nature says being an idiot is a reason you deserve to be killed.
You know that you are an idiot, don't you?
It's funny that you don't What a huge idiot you are.
Idiot.Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
Insurance companies should make them take those dumbass "shoot me I'll stand here like an idiot" signs down.
Learn how to put together a grammatically correct sentence you frothing-at-the-mouth, uneducated, bitter old man.'deserve'? no, of course notThink about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
being an idiot doesn't mean you deserve to be killed.
lose business? yea, fuck you for being retarded.
The law of nature says being an idiot is a reason you deserve to be killed.
You know that you are an idiot, don't you?
It's funny that you don't What a huge idiot you are.
Think about it. If you're a criminal looking for a place to rob, or a terrorist looking for a "soft" target, who do you think they're going to go after? A gun free sign is just asking for trouble. Isn't it?
Your position is the same in reverse as someone that would blame a gun friendly zone or allowing carry for a gun crime. You would be better served promoting resposible gun ownership and reasonable carry laws (cant carry everywhere you want). Insisting guns be allowed everywhere is just going to piss people off and portray gun rights advocates as unreasonable.So with your dumb ass logic, if a person is attacked in a pro gun zone they should blame that. Your extreme idiocy is not helping gun rights advocates.No. Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked. I'm already seeing some childish responses on the subject.
Nobody in that restaurant should be attacked due to the positions the establishment has on guns. So knock it off.
Agreed. Nobody should be attacked for any reason. But if a person is attacked in a gun-free zone, they have to blame themselves at least a little. I don't do business with places that have those signs on the window. That's not to say if I see one of those signs, I'm going to turn around and go home. But I know I won't go back to that business.
Idiocy is doing business that has a "WELCOME" sign to criminals. Most people with common sense understand that a criminal will commit crime in the easiest area to do so. Given a choice, a criminal will not elect to pick a place where they may end up injured or dead. They would rather commit crimes in places where everybody is a victim.
