Do you want Obama to send troops to fight ISIS?

Samuel Nixon

Active Member
May 20, 2015
89
13
31
Nearly two-thirds of voters say U.S. allies losing fight against Islamic State - Washington Times

A lot has been said about isis and it seems we the people of the United States are united with the point on the future of isis.
It is clear that they must be killed (no variants).

To solve the problem we train Iraqis troops to do all the dirty job (doesn't work cause muslims sympathize muslims, even the most radical ones) and at the moment we are not officially involved into a War with isis.

What do you think, should we send our troops to fight isis or should we wait for something?

What is more important - lives of our soldiers or lives of the innocent refusing to negotiate with terrorists?
 
Nearly two-thirds of voters say U.S. allies losing fight against Islamic State - Washington Times

A lot has been said about isis and it seems we the people of the United States are united with the point on the future of isis.
It is clear that they must be killed (no variants).

To solve the problem we train Iraqis troops to do all the dirty job (doesn't work cause muslims sympathize muslims, even the most radical ones) and at the moment we are not officially involved into a War with isis.

What do you think, should we send our troops to fight isis or should we wait for something?

What is more important - lives of our soldiers or lives of the innocent refusing to negotiate with terrorists?
If they attack us, then use everything we have to wipe them out in a hurry. If they attack someone else, then let someone else sacrifice their men and women to fight them. We've sacrifices way to many of our soldiers with absolutely nothing to show for it. After spending almost 25 years fighting terrorists, all we have to show for it is many dead, many disabled, and astronomical debt. When is enough going to be enough? Either we fight war as war, or stay home.
 
then they should be defeated based mainly on principle , we owned it , it was getting much better until 'you know who' pulled out all the troops . Anyway , yeah , best do it now or the cowards and dummys that elected mrobama will just have to kiss 'Islamic state' azzez sometime in the future Samuel.
 
Of course not. We have an obastard as presidunce.

Not a single American toenail should be under this obamanation in combat.
 
kinda agree , mrobama will never allow the war to be fought correctly !!
 
course Islamic state and other enemies will just grow stronger in the time period that his regime is still in power .
 
course Islamic state and other enemies will just grow stronger in the time period that his regime is still in power .
So they will. Do we have them grow stronger with or without dead Americans ?

Rather than let obama send our military to their deaths, keep them for when we have a better commander.
 
Nearly two-thirds of voters say U.S. allies losing fight against Islamic State - Washington Times

A lot has been said about isis and it seems we the people of the United States are united with the point on the future of isis.
It is clear that they must be killed (no variants).

To solve the problem we train Iraqis troops to do all the dirty job (doesn't work cause muslims sympathize muslims, even the most radical ones) and at the moment we are not officially involved into a War with isis.

What do you think, should we send our troops to fight isis or should we wait for something?

What is more important - lives of our soldiers or lives of the innocent refusing to negotiate with terrorists?

No. Let them kill iran.
 
I say let the troops decide. They deserve better. Im sick of seeing them be sent to wars by civilian turds in Washington who wont take care of them once they return.
 
Well the ROEs from what I've read limit the Shia troops from fighting in Sunni zones because of 1600.

:lmao: I want to cry. They are apparently worried at the WH that by sending in better Shia fighters into a Sunni zone that sectarian violence could break out.

Not worried about ISIS. Worried about sectarian violence. You can't make this shit up.
 
Right now we have a DoD that's bragging about 8-10 air strikes per day when early in Iraq we were doing hundreds of them per day


What's up with your lunatic Generals by the way. Bad enough you got that crazy mother fucker with NATO now you have assholes like this one going"Iraqis ran away".
 
Doesn't really matter Obama has made it very clear he will not send in ground troops no matter what.

Why would he? Iraqis won't even fight.


Well thats a flat out lie.

Really? ISIS has lots of great US weapons from Iraqis throwing them down and running away.

US weapons were provided by the CIA via the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood with Qatar, Turkey and SA's help.

Want the New York Times link lib?

NOW in this battle all they did was pull back. Do you understand war? At all douche bag?

They didn't run away and that General should face a firing squad for saying they did so. That's Obama politics talking.
 
Right now we have a DoD that's bragging about 8-10 air strikes per day when early in Iraq we were doing hundreds of them per day


What's up with your lunatic Generals by the way. Bad enough you got that crazy mother fucker with NATO now you have assholes like this one going"Iraqis ran away".

They did run away.

Prove it bitch. Give me a link apart from the fuck faced Obama dick sucking General.
 

Forum List

Back
Top