Not do you think it is followed, or will it ever be followed, or anything like that.
But as an ideological position, do you believe the laws outlined in the Constitution should constrain the government and politicians in what they're able to do?
Do you think if something is explicitly unconstitutional, the government shouldn't be able to do it?
Yes or no?
the constitution is supposed to be read to most broadly allow individual liberties. if it were about "constraining government" there wouldn't be broadly written commerce and general welfare clauses.
don't you mean to ask "if you think something is explicitly unconstitutional, the government shouldn't be able to do it?"
and the answer is no. it's constitutional until the court says its not, after appropriate challenge. no one cares what you, i or the idiot down the street thinks about whether an act is constitutional.