Do you have a problem with children and parents being detained in separate facilities?

[sparky]

It's inhumane treatment and notice employers of illegals still aren't being punished.

It's inhumane to leave kids with abusive parents who took their children with them on their criminal endeavors and endangered their lives going across the desert. Cut the spin

But not via political sanction.....

Iraq Sanctions Kill Children, U.N. Reports
~S~

 

[jon_berzerk]

Do you have a problem with children and parents being detained in separate facilities?

no it is against the law to house children in Adult facilities

 

[sparky]

(I’d pretend I didn’t see this post if I were you)

too late...

6 Illegal Interview Questions to Avoid

exhibit #1 of 'effed up laws'

~S~

 

[Thinker101]

It's inhumane treatment and notice employers of illegals still aren't being punished.

You keep parroting that. You might want to enlighten yourself a bit. You’re kinda making an ass out of yourself bud.
Here in Mexifornia employers are forbidden to ask for proof of citizenship. Tell me, how do you propose to punish an employer for hiring an illegal wetback when he/she isn’t privy to the cockroaches place of origin?
(I’d pretend I didn’t see this post if I were you)

California’s New E-Verify Law - Get It Right or Pay the Price | Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives

 

[Norman]

What are these people doing on our side of the border, is an even better question. Doesn't Mexico have cages of their own to put their criminals into?

 

[leftwinger]

When an American citizen is arrested for a crime. He is separated from his family and put in jail.

So why should illegals who have committed a criminal act by sneaking across our border be treated any different? ....

Many are here trying to get refugee status.

You got a lot of land. Put up tents-porta-potties.

 

[Kondor3]

I don't like it. I think it's inhumane and unnecessary in the vast majority of cases. If one of the immigrant parents has committed a serious crime, then, yes, segregate him or her from their kids. Otherwise, we need to keep parents and kids together if the parents' only crime was trying to enter America illegally to build a better life.

It doesn't matter one little bit if they snuck into (or overstayed in) the US to build a better life, or to hone their hopscotch skills, or whatever.

They're here illegally... they go... they've committed a crime... and criminal processing requires the separation of suspects from non-suspects.

Don't want that to happen to your brats? Don't bring them here, and don't step onto (or overstay on) US soil without our prior express consent.

We owe them nothing.

Nothing.

But we DO send a message with this approach.

That message being: "You are no longer welcome here. Violate our borders and sovereignty and break our laws at your very great peril."

As word spreads south of the border we will begin to see less and less of this.

Which is, of course, the entire point of the exercise.

Payback's a bitch, isn't it, LibTards?

You should have cut a deal while you still could.

 

[BrokeLoser]

(I’d pretend I didn’t see this post if I were you)

too late...

6 Illegal Interview Questions to Avoid

exhibit #1 of 'effed up laws'

~S~

It's inhumane treatment and notice employers of illegals still aren't being punished.

You keep parroting that. You might want to enlighten yourself a bit. You’re kinda making an ass out of yourself bud.
Here in Mexifornia employers are forbidden to ask for proof of citizenship. Tell me, how do you propose to punish an employer for hiring an illegal wetback when he/she isn’t privy to the cockroaches place of origin?
(I’d pretend I didn’t see this post if I were you)

California’s New E-Verify Law - Get It Right or Pay the Price | Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives

Exactly fellas.
I love it when filthy Liberals start with the “make employers pay” bunch of bullshit in a feeble attempt to deflect blame.
JoeB131 and jasonnfree are a couple illegal wetback lovers that parrot that shit daily. They act like they have no idea that Mexicrats have designated wetbacks as a protected class.
FOOLS!

 

[WillowTree]

It's inhumane treatment and notice employers of illegals still aren't being punished.

So do ewe think people in jail should take their children with them?

 

[Moonglow]

When an American citizen is arrested for a crime. He is separated from his family and put in jail.

So why should illegals who have committed a criminal act by sneaking across our border be treated any different? ....

Many are here trying to get refugee status.

You got a lot of land. Put up tents-porta-potties.

I can't afford the neon sign, you better wampum big skins to make it happen. Did you injuns ever get back yer land the whites illegally took, no...

 

[sparky]

Doesn't Mexico have cages of their own to put their criminals into?

Mexico is one big cage with crappy boaders

~S~

 

[sparky]

So do ewe think people in jail should take their children with them?

Tax paid family picnic.....?

~S~

 

[Care4all]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

 

[Moonglow]

Doesn't Mexico have cages of their own to put their criminals into?

Mexico is one big cage with crappy boaders

~S~

How much do the boarders pay to let?

 

[Moonglow]

It's inhumane treatment and notice employers of illegals still aren't being punished.

So do ewe think people in jail should take their children with them?

Sure why not?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

No, they shouldn't be trying to come in illegally, refugee, illegal, whatever you want to call them.

 

[Care4all]

these ARE NOT MEXICANS simply crossing illegally, these are people from South America or Central America, seeking refugee status....they are crossing near the gate or thru the gate, turning themselves in, and seeking Asylum help.

 

[Moonglow]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

No, they shouldn't be trying to come in illegally, refugee, illegal, whatever you want to call them.

What is yer family's excuse then?

 

[Norman]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

Yes... yes... the famous rapefugees card.

How many of those people are actually refugees? I bet the overwhelming minority. Having a shitty country does unfortunately not qualify one for the refugee status. They should just live with what they have created, and not try to spread the crap elsewhere.

 

[Moonglow]

YES....when it is simply for a MISDEMEANOR charge, if they do not qualify for REFUGEE status after it has been reviewed.

They should not be treated like they are being charged with a felony. like the people trying to cross the border illegally a second time, AFTER their first time and their refugee status was DENIED and they were shipped back home once before.

91% of these separations f parents from their children are for people who may be charged with a MISDEMEANOR,only 9% with a felony...

for goodness sake! We don't take children from their parents for an alleged misdemeanor charge....that's is NOT JUSTICE.

And that is not how the laws were written, Congress gave mercy for first time crossers seeking refugee status by making the illegal crossing for them a misdemeanor, and then came down hard with a felony for second time crossers who had already been given leniency/mercy and a chance to see if they did qualify for Refugee Asylum....

What Sessions is doing, is making the first time crosser and misdemeanor charge, EQUAL TO the felony charge, when Congress clearly separated the two circumstances.... sessions is DEFYING the law and the spirit of the law.

The parents shouldnt be engaging in illegal activities. Perhaps, the parents should consider how they put their children at risk before they endeavor in this illegal activity.

Hello?

they are seeking refugee status. If they do qualify, it is NOT a crime at all.

And if it is a crime, it is a misdemeanor....a misdemeanor!!! For goodness sake....NOT A FELONY.... and it used to be simply a "civil offense" like a parking ticket....

And NO, people coming here from Honduras or ElSalvador seeking refugee asylum status should NOT be separated from their kids... they are not even charged with the misdemeanor, until they have been denied the Refugee status, if they do qualify for refugee status, there is no charge at all. The kids should not be taken from their parents under those circumstances...PERIOD.

Yes... yes... the famous rapefugees card.

How many of those people are actually refugees? I bet the overwhelming minority. Having a shitty country does unfortunately not qualify one for the refugee status. They should just live with what they have created, and not try to spread the crap elsewhere.

Again the Europeans for three hundred years dumped their problems on North, South and Central America and they killed to take that which was not theirs and you bitch about the poor people who come here now..