Do NOT Discriminate Against Straight Men

Status
Not open for further replies.
definition said:
Is that what you have left? Personal insults? You can't actually construct a coherrent argument to defeat my analysis so you go with the churlish behavior. I know, you can't help it, most conservatives suffer of impulse control disorders. But, I do believe there's treatment for that. A little Zoloft and Risperadal maybe?

if you honestly believe two males performing sexual acts on each other, consenting or otherwise, does not constitue homosexual behavior then....yes we must restort to making fun of you....
 
definition said:
Cameron is a conservative and conservatives do not usually posses the intellectual capacity to draw distinctions and recognize nuances.
Yeh, looks like I was f*cking prophetic.
 
definition said:
.....Of, relating to, or having a sexual orientation to persons of the same sex.

Main Entry: ori·en·ta·tion
Pronunciation: "Or-E-&n-'tA-sh&n, "or-, -"en-
2 : a usually general or lasting direction of thought, inclination, or interest

As far as you're bisexual definition, I'm sorry, but I will still stand firm on the fact that IF you engage in any kind of sexual activity with somone of the same sex, you are a homosexual. You may not choose to continue this behavior for a variety of reasons but it still reveals a skewed behavioral/thinking pattern.
 
Joz said:
Does an actor who commits a murder on screen make him a murderer? Or the actor who cheats in a movie make him an adulterer?
But there is a responsibility, that I think is taken all too lightly, of the influence they wield.
Poor comparison. The murder is not actually occuring. The homosexual act is. You're comparing a real situation with a simulated situation. Perhaps what you meant was that the actors/actresses didn't get any enjoyment from the act?
 
definition said:
Then you must admit that, in the very least, rape is in a grey area that doesn't fully conform to the notion of sexual conduct and therefore, we cannot properly decipher a person's sexual orientation based solely on the sex of his rape victims.
No.
 
Joz said:
I'll reiterate,

A man who sticks his peter in another man is a homosexual.
How long do you have to go without committing a homosexual act to no longer be considered a homosexual? Are you a homo for life? If you make out with your girlfriend in college out of drunken curiousity, are you a dyke at 70 years old even if you never touched another woman since?
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Poor comparison. The murder is not actually occuring. The homosexual act is. You're comparing a real situation with a simulated situation. Perhaps what you meant was that the actors/actresses didn't get any enjoyment from the act?

Perhaps you're a dillweed?
 
manu1959 said:
if you honestly believe two males performing sexual acts on each other, consenting or otherwise, does not constitue homosexual behavior then....yes we must restort to making fun of you....
Did I ever say that it doesn't constitute homosexual behavior? No. I never said that. You need a reading comprehansion lesson. I said that the mere fact that one engages in homosexual activity does not make that person of a homosexual orientation.

Male-male pedophillia is not homosexual behavior. It is rape. One can't determine the sexual orientation of a rapist based on the gender of his rape victims. Homosexual behavior involves consent of both partners. A child can't consent. It is therefore not homosexual behavior. Furthermore, one cannot draw conclusions about one's adult sexual orientation based ontheir pedophillic behavior. That has been proven by the fact that 98% of men who molest boys have adult heterosexual orientations.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
How long do you have to go without committing a homosexual act to no longer be considered a homosexual? Are you a homo for life? If you make out with your girlfriend in college out of drunken curiousity, are you a dyke at 70 years old even if you never touched another woman since?

WOw. Clay, you're truly a though provoking genius.
 
definition said:
Did I ever say that it doesn't constitute homosexual behavior? No. I never said that. You need a reading comprehansion lesson. I said that the mere fact that one engages in homosexual activity does not make that person of a homosexual orientation.

Male-male pedophillia is not homosexual behavior. It is rape. One can't determine the sexual orientation of a rapist based on the gender of his rape victims. Homosexual behavior involves consent of both partners. A child can't consent. It is therefore not homosexual behavior. Furthermore, one cannot draw conclusions about one's adult sexual orientation based ontheir pedophillic behavior. That has been proven by the fact that 98% of men who molest boys have adult heterosexual orientations.

What about a consenting man boy relationship that is not coercive? Is that homosexual? Of course not. That might make gays look bad, and we can't have that. You're such a brainless hack.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
Poor comparison.
I didn't think so.
The murder is not actually occuring. The homosexual act is. You're comparing a real situation with a simulated situation. Perhaps what you meant was that the actors/actresses didn't get any enjoyment from the act?
Are you referring to so called movie magic you see on the big screen or are you referring to porn?
 
rtwngAvngr said:
Perhaps you're a dillweed?
If you want me to delve again into the numerous personality flaws you posess, just PM me. I'm sick of hijacking every thread to call you out every time you've regained enough self-confidence to toss some third grader insult my way.
 
Joz said:
I didn't think so.

Are you referring to so called movie magic you see on the big screen or are you referring to porn?
Movies. Hollywood movies. There are plenty of homosexual acts in movies performed by heterosexual actors. Unless you're insinuating they're all just an illusion.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
If you want me to delve again into the numerous personality flaws you posess, just PM me. I'm sick of hijacking every thread to call you out every time you've regained enough self-confidence to toss some third grader insult my way.

You've never effectively called me out. I'm just astounded by your ability to nearly always prove yourself foolish.
 
The ClayTaurus said:
How long do you have to go without committing a homosexual act to no longer be considered a homosexual? Are you a homo for life? If you make out with your girlfriend in college out of drunken curiousity, are you a dyke at 70 years old even if you never touched another woman since?
I love that, "Oh I was drunk" excuse. Covers a multitude of unacceptable behaviors.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
You've never effectively called me out. I'm just astounded by your ability to nearly always prove yourself foolish.
Effective is subjective. I rhymed that for you, oh proprietor of prose.
 
rtwngAvngr said:
What about a consenting man boy relationship that is not coercive? Is that homosexual? Of course not. That might make gays look bad, and we can't have that. You're such a brainless hack.

A consenting man/boy relationship? Unless the boy is at least 16 or 17 years old then there really is no consent. If he's 16 or 17 that wouldn't be pedophillia, so it wouldn't count towrds the "discussion" we're having.

Brainless hack? You all can't understand the difference between an adult sexual orientation and a pedophliic sexual orientation, and I'm the brainless hack? No I don't think so. When you recognize the fact that pedophillia has nothing to do with ANY adult sexual orientation let me know. And here's a hint: adult sexual orientations do NOT include attractions to children.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top