Do Deviants with Purple Dildos have access to your children?

[JakeStarkey]

Health and sex ed does belong in the public curriculum

 

[RodISHI]

Teaching young children about various sexual practices being all fine and dandy is not a mentality or physically healthy practice. The so called sex education programs along with adult content continually being foisted into the realm of public access has created a generation of sexualized teens who grow up to be confused adults

They are in schools to learn skills that will serve them in their future roles in their adult lives not to be indoctrinated for they will become a mentally unstable sexual conquest early on.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I know you believe your comment that "The so called sex education programs along with adult content continually being foisted into the realm of public access has created a generation of sexualized teens who grow up to be confused adults."

I think you are overstating the problem and manipulating the evidence.

However, it's your right, so you and yours get on the school board.

 

[RodISHI]

We have a decent school board here and I do not live in the same town as my grands still in school but I see the tragic events unfolding throughout as idiots work to socially engineer children with their weird and off the wall ideas. Since the state/government determined it owns everyone's children for the sake of educational products (commerce) and it will be the one who determines what the school curriculum will consist of, sex education is a portion they removed as being the parents responsibility. In that the whole has become more screwed up both mentally and physiologically.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Most American may consider your ideas "weird and off the wall", Rodishi. No, the state and government does not think "it owns everyone's children", but since We the People support public education, then its representatives manage the school system.

Your grandchildren can be put into private schools instead.

 

[RodISHI]

Most American may consider your ideas "weird and off the wall", Rodishi. No, the state and government does not think "it owns everyone's children", but since We the People support public education, then its representatives manage the school system.

Your grandchildren can be put into private schools instead.

People obviously are not satisfied with the current public education system in many areas. There are not private schools in all areas and some states are still not conducive to families teaching their own children outside of the public school system. Plus some people cannot afford private schools. There are people right on this board that are claiming rights over and above the rights of the parents and there are people like that in the public school systems and in government. There are even documents that came out in the Obama Administration that eluded to owning the children in the nation- I will see if I can find those.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Let' make that more accurate: some "People obviously are not satisfied with the current public education in many areas." Most people are satisfied, or there would be changes. Work for change.

 

[RodISHI]

The people have been working "for change" and not the type Obama gave them. That is why they elected Donald Trump as president and a majority of Republican legislators.

 

[JakeStarkey]

^^ Fallacy of confirmation bias.

ELEVEN MILLION MORE voted against him.

And those school districts voters in the Red States have pushed against the small minority of far right Christian dominionists for decades, winning almost every strugge.

 

[RodISHI]

No fallacy to it when you look at the voting records and erroneous votes in populated areas like Southern California and the district Chicago is in. That discussion is for another thread though which I already posted on the board. A few metropolitan areas with massive amounts of illegal votes registered do not get to dictate to the rest of the country.

Sex education of children has nothing to do with religion. That is a fallacy on your part as you already have your own personal bias and erroneous misconceptions about other people's faith and beliefs. People worldwide managed to procreate effectively and efficiently for thousands of years without government involvement.

 

[JakeStarkey]

There are no problems with the votes and records in larger populations any more than small populations in school districts.

Rodishi has her own confirmation "bias and erroneous misconceptions about other people's [sic] faith and beliefs," and why they vote that way they do.

 

[RodISHI]

California parents are not all happy with the new programming.
https://www.christianheadlines.com/...a-sex-ed-class-spurs-parental-rights-law.html
https://www.christianheadlines.com/...a-sex-ed-class-spurs-parental-rights-law.html
Controversial California Sex-Ed Class Spurs Parental Rights Law ...
https://www.christianheadlines.com/.../controversial-california-sex-ed-class-spurs-pare...
Apr 21, 2015 - A controversial sex-education program at a California high school has ... Like most states, California already allows parents to opt-out their ...
[PDF]Question & Answer Guide On California's Parental Opt-Out Statutes:
www.casafeschools.org/OptOutQA.pdf
instruction, and/or “opt out” of controversial aspects of the curriculum. California's education laws are complex, and both parents and school administrators are ... their families' beliefs or practices concerning sex, family life, morality, or religion.
Cupertino Schools: New sex-ed curriculum fails to pass after parent ...
www.mercurynews.com/.../cupertino-schools-new-sex-ed-curriculum-fails-to-pass-aft...
Mar 29, 2017 - The new curriculum is being proposed as a result of the California Healthy Youth Act ... Many parents said they agree that sex education is important and ... so they can opt out of certain lessons while not missing out on others.
Palo Alto parents join fight against new sex-ed curriculum
www.mercurynews.com/.../palo-alto-parents-join-fight-against-new-sex-ed-curriculu...
Apr 20, 2017 - Palo Alto parents protesting a new sex-education curriculum, spoke out at a Palo ... The California Healthy Youth Act, which took effect January 2016, ... Ji signed the opt-out form for her child and advised her to turn in the form ...
Complaints about sex education classes escalate - The San Diego ...
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/.../education/sd-me-sex-education-20170517-story.h...
May 18, 2017 - More than 1000 people have complained that a new sex education curriculum in ... to the California Healthy Youth Act, which went into effect in January. ... She also said parents can have their children opt out of the classes.
Transgender Agenda & Schools -- Some Won't Even Let Parents Opt ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../transgender-agenda-schools-some-wont-even-let-parents-...
Sep 4, 2017 - California requires schools to let parents opt their children out of sex education, which excludes 'gender identity,' however, according to the ...
Palo Alto parents protest new sex ed curriculum | News | Palo Alto ...
https://www.paloaltoonline.com/.../palo-alto-parents-protest-new-sex-ed-curriculum
Apr 14, 2017 - The California Healthy Youth Act states that sex education must be "integrated, .... The principals also notified parents of their right to opt out.
California school board won't let kids opt out of transgender lessons ...
https://www.lifesitenews.com/.../california-school-board-wont-let-kids-opt-out-of-tran...
Sep 19, 2017 - California law requires parental notice and opt-out for sex education. And while the five-member board approved a policy to notify parents for ...
Frequently Asked Questions - California Department of Education
Frequently Asked Questions - Comprehensive Sexual Health & HIV/AIDS Instruction (CA Dept of Education)
Apr 3, 2017 - How many schools provide comprehensive sexual health education, even though .... Do parents and/or guardians need to be informed if their child is to receive ... Does the law permit the use of outside speakers to deliver sex ...
California's New Sex Education Requirements | California Healthline
California’s New Sex Education Requirements
Mar 2, 2016 - “Over 90 percent of schools were teaching some sex education, but because it ... Parents or guardians must be notified that their child will receive this instruction and be ... The law allows them to opt out with a written request.
[PDF]Uneven Progress: Sex Education in California Public Schools
https://www.aclunc.org/sites/default/files/uneven_progress_full_report.pdf
by S Combellick - ‎2011 - ‎Cited by 3 - ‎Related articles
emphasis on evidence-based, medically accurate sex education. ... However, as findings from this study show, many schools are out of compliance with ..... “Opt-in” policies, in which parents must write or sign a letter in order for their child to.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Then get to work.

 

[evenflow1969]

Then get to work.

Highly doubtfull that the school was pushing porn on kids! It boils down to this, the internet gives kids access to porn period. I do not care what you try to do with filters there is always a way around them. All you have to do is create an IE5 web browser of your own with vb and you can get around any filter. I am absolutely sure that kids were veiwing porn at school, they have smart phones if you have unlimited data you do not even need to sign on to their hot spot. Smart phone with unlimited data means unlimited porn for any child that has one. This is what kills me about 5 year olds having smart phones. When my son was thirteen I took the family to the zoo and my son kept disappearing, came to find out he was on one of these hook up sites that tell you when some one is near and you can go meet them. Little fucker had his smart phone taken away and a flip phone the next day. As far as the school is copncerned of course they are going to give you the run around they know that the oinly way to keep porn out of the school is no internet access and smart phone checked at the door. Our society would not put up with this, we won't even allow the paddle at the school. We would say the school is not staying with the times by eliminating the internet not to mention the whole no phone thing there are many parents that would argue safety. Some times I wonder if the Amish are not on to something.

 

[RodISHI]

Then get to work.

Highly doubtfull that the school was pushing porn on kids! It boils down to this, the internet gives kids access to porn period. I do not care what you try to do with filters there is always a way around them. All you have to do is create an IE5 web browser of your own with vb and you can get around any filter. I am absolutely sure that kids were veiwing porn at school, they have smart phones if you have unlimited data you do not even need to sign on to their hot spot. Smart phone with unlimited data means unlimited porn for any child that has one. This is what kills me about 5 year olds having smart phones. When my son was thirteen I took the family to the zoo and my son kept disappearing, came to find out he was on one of these hook up sites that tell you when some one is near and you can go meet them. Little fucker had his smart phone taken away and a flip phone the next day. As far as the school is copncerned of course they are going to give you the run around they know that the oinly way to keep porn out of the school is no internet access and smart phone checked at the door. Our society would not put up with this, we won't even allow the paddle at the school. We would say the school is not staying with the times by eliminating the internet not to mention the whole no phone thing there are many parents that would argue safety. Some times I wonder if the Amish are not on to something.

Thank you. I live close to a lot of Amish folks and I can assure they have their fair share of problems also but many of their children generally have a much better life than children in the mainstream.

The problem with a one size all approach in anything when it comes to humans and their children is one size does not fit all. Children do not mature at the same time. Even with adults some are more mature than others but as a society we should do a better job of protecting our children instead of subjecting their minds with content that even most stable adults would avoid.

 

[RodISHI]

It doesn't take any religion of any kind to know that teaching children porn and sexual deviance as being normal and fine and dandy is not healthy for them.

Jakey, if people want their own children to be satiated with information that belongs in a red light district then they can take them into those areas and by all means share whatever they think is appropriate for them (again if it is their own children) if it legal. Everyone pays taxes in one form or another that supports the public school system but not everyone is a parent of the children that attend those public schools and not all have the best interest of the children's futures in mind first and foremost. You seem to be willing to discriminate against the children of the poor by filling their heads with licentious behaviors as being normal rather than allowing them to mature enough to grow up and have healthy mental capabilities to avoid the challenges and issues that comes along with adult type promiscuity that has flooded those in the 'blow jobs are not really sex generation' that BJ Bill helped get started.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Those who refuse to provide public health and sex education are the enablers of poorly prepared students who reach adulthood.

Schools overwhelmingly reject the opponents of good public education and invite them to use private schools.

 

[RodISHI]

Those who believe that they have a right to dictate that others may have access to other peoples children to sexualize them should be fully neutralized so they can never be around other peoples children.

 

[flacaltenn]

Those who refuse to provide public health and sex education are the enablers of poorly prepared students who reach adulthood.

Schools overwhelmingly reject the opponents of good public education and invite them to use private schools.

You're definition of "good public education" is completely bogus when the less and less academics are featured in the curriculum. It's now a form of Sunday School featuring left-leaning values, ethics and mangled history.

OF COURSE public systems REJECT objections from kids and parents. They don't HAVE to listen. THEY are intellectually superior and MORALLY "working god's mission" for their political persuasion.

No children pre-puberty need this kind of preaching. It's NOT sex-ed. It's frightening and childhood killing.
Stick to education, so they don't fall behind in academics. Like they do now...

 

[JakeStarkey]

The anti sex and health-ed opposition here is making false arguments and sensationalizing the issue.

Leave the pros to do their job, and have the concerned parents get involved at the schools.