Diversity is a Weakness, Not a Strength

[beagle9]

True diversity, when people of different races and gender work together and it seems so normal nobody gives it a second thought.

. The word diversity has been used as a hammer by those seeking political power in this country, and the wanting to change the country big time into what they see it fit for. The pushing of diversity has been a created code that allows them to musle in to areas (by way of government force), and to change those areas or minds by government force. The problem is that it has moved beyond the eraddication of racism, and on to now being used to erradicate cultures, characters, religious views, time honored traditions, and etc.

 

[Vastator]

For perspective, understand that the OP believes that discriminating on the basis of race should be a right.

It is a right. In fact it is one of the most natural “rights” discussed on this forum; as it is a right that cannot be taken away from you. It can only be penalized.

I guess that makes rape and murder rights.

lol, see how these conservatives think?????

Wrong. Rape and murder are crimes. Holding personal preferences, or biases, is not. Congratulations on the weak retort. It suits you.

 

[Crixus]

For perspective, understand that the OP believes that discriminating on the basis of race should be a right.

It is a right. In fact it is one of the most natural “rights” discussed on this forum; as it is a right that cannot be taken away from you. It can only be penalized.

I guess that makes rape and murder rights.

lol, see how these conservatives think?????

There's a major difference that rape, and murder are actual violent acts, unlike racist opinions.

Hitler had some racist ideas. I think those lead to violent acts.

 

[beagle9]

For perspective, understand that the OP believes that discriminating on the basis of race should be a right.

It is a right. In fact it is one of the most natural “rights” discussed on this forum; as it is a right that cannot be taken away from you. It can only be penalized.

I guess that makes rape and murder rights.

lol, see how these conservatives think?????

There's a major difference that rape, and murder are actual violent acts, unlike racist opinions.

. It can be said however that extreme racist opinions can then lead to violence or influence the acts of violence to be carried out by the weak minded in society. This can be the case on any side of the isle's that are found in any society.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

For perspective, understand that the OP believes that discriminating on the basis of race should be a right.

It is a right. In fact it is one of the most natural “rights” discussed on this forum; as it is a right that cannot be taken away from you. It can only be penalized.

I guess that makes rape and murder rights.

lol, see how these conservatives think?????

There's a major difference that rape, and murder are actual violent acts, unlike racist opinions.

Hitler had some racist ideas. I think those lead to violent acts.

Hitler killed mostly White Christians, about 20 - 30 million in Russia alone, another 3 million in Poland, and some else where.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

For perspective, understand that the OP believes that discriminating on the basis of race should be a right.

It is a right. In fact it is one of the most natural “rights” discussed on this forum; as it is a right that cannot be taken away from you. It can only be penalized.

I guess that makes rape and murder rights.

lol, see how these conservatives think?????

There's a major difference that rape, and murder are actual violent acts, unlike racist opinions.

. It can be said however that extreme racist opinions can then lead to violence or influence the acts of violence to be carried out by the weak minded in society. This can be the case on any side of the isle's found in any society.

Any ideology can lead to violence, there's even been environmentalists who've killed for the environment.

 

[beagle9]

For perspective, understand that the OP believes that discriminating on the basis of race should be a right.

It is a right. In fact it is one of the most natural “rights” discussed on this forum; as it is a right that cannot be taken away from you. It can only be penalized.

I guess that makes rape and murder rights.

lol, see how these conservatives think?????

There's a major difference that rape, and murder are actual violent acts, unlike racist opinions.

Hitler had some racist ideas. I think those lead to violent acts.

Hitler killed mostly White Christians, about 20 - 30 million in Russia alone, another 3 million in Poland, and some else where.

. Didn't Hitler consider himself a Christian or a follower of the religion by mouth, but not by his actions ?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

It is a right. In fact it is one of the most natural “rights” discussed on this forum; as it is a right that cannot be taken away from you. It can only be penalized.

I guess that makes rape and murder rights.

lol, see how these conservatives think?????

There's a major difference that rape, and murder are actual violent acts, unlike racist opinions.

Hitler had some racist ideas. I think those lead to violent acts.

Hitler killed mostly White Christians, about 20 - 30 million in Russia alone, another 3 million in Poland, and some else where.

. Didn't Hitler consider himself a Christian or a follower of the religion by mouth, but not by his actions ?

According to Albert Speer, Hitler preferred Islam over Christianity.

 

[beagle9]

For perspective, understand that the OP believes that discriminating on the basis of race should be a right.

It is a right. In fact it is one of the most natural “rights” discussed on this forum; as it is a right that cannot be taken away from you. It can only be penalized.

I guess that makes rape and murder rights.

lol, see how these conservatives think?????

There's a major difference that rape, and murder are actual violent acts, unlike racist opinions.

. It can be said however that extreme racist opinions can then lead to violence or influence the acts of violence to be carried out by the weak minded in society. This can be the case on any side of the isle's found in any society.

Any ideology can lead to violence, there's even been environmentalists who've killed for the environment.

. A consensus such as exist in the Constitution we uphold, and the Bible in which we have read allowed us to make corrections, keep the violence within at bay, and make this republic work over time (of course not without incident). The errosion of these two beliefs in the nation, has since placed us into uncharted waters, and this is where storms, rogue waves and danger lurks a top every wave bejng navigated while in the storm.

 

[beagle9]

I guess that makes rape and murder rights.

lol, see how these conservatives think?????

There's a major difference that rape, and murder are actual violent acts, unlike racist opinions.

Hitler had some racist ideas. I think those lead to violent acts.

Hitler killed mostly White Christians, about 20 - 30 million in Russia alone, another 3 million in Poland, and some else where.

. Didn't Hitler consider himself a Christian or a follower of the religion by mouth, but not by his actions ?

According to Albert Speer, Hitler preferred Islam over Christianity.

. Christianity wasn't violent enough for him eh ?

 

[bripat9643]

Systematically protecting and preserving white supremacy is the answer?

Only a piece of shit like you would call limiting immigration "protecting white supremacy." That's how we know the term doesn't mean anything.

 

[bripat9643]

How the fuck do you explain our love and support for Ben Carson, Condi Rice, Walter E. Williams, Clarence Thomas, etc?

`
Because they represent token Republicans. You can also add ex-sheriff David Clarke to that list.

You represent the mentally retarded.

 

[bripat9643]

For perspective, understand that the OP believes that discriminating on the basis of race should be a right.

It does no such thing, moron.

 

[Crixus]

There's a major difference that rape, and murder are actual violent acts, unlike racist opinions.

Hitler had some racist ideas. I think those lead to violent acts.

Hitler killed mostly White Christians, about 20 - 30 million in Russia alone, another 3 million in Poland, and some else where.

. Didn't Hitler consider himself a Christian or a follower of the religion by mouth, but not by his actions ?

According to Albert Speer, Hitler preferred Islam over Christianity.

. Christianity wasn't violent enough for him eh ?

Not typically. And it wasn't right for his time or his situation. People like hitler prefer them selves over anything. Really ain't a way to liken his actions to those of any theology.

 

[beagle9]

How the fuck do you explain our love and support for Ben Carson, Condi Rice, Walter E. Williams, Clarence Thomas, etc?

`
Because they represent token Republicans. You can also add ex-sheriff David Clarke to that list.

You represent the mentally retarded.

. She represents a racist mentality.

 

[jillian]

The snowflakes have been bleating aobut the wonders of "diversity" ever since I can remember. However, it's actually a big lie, in the Goebbels sense of the term. Here's an interesting article that explains why it's bullshit. We don't benefit from immigration. We are positively harmed by it.

Diversity is a Weakness, Not a Strength​

"Diversity is a strength” is one of those Orwellian maxims that’s just generally accepted as truth by most Americans despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Granted, if you’re talking about a DIVERSITY OF IDEAS, you can certainly come up with some situations where it’s a strength. For example, in the movie World War Z, Israel is saved (at least temporarily) by having a “tenth man” whose job is to forcefully argue for the alternative viewpoint to a situation where everyone agrees. So instead of laughing off the idea that Israel might face a zombie invasion, Israelis realized there was merit to it and was prepared in time to protect the country. Back in the real world, the NFL certainly could have used someone pointing out the potential long-term downsides of allowing players disrespect the flag when just Colin Kaepernick was doing it. Donald Trump might benefit from a diversity of opinions when he’s about to tweet about Rosie O’Donnell or Mark Cuban at 4 AM. The Democrat Party could certainly use the input of a few random white factory workers from flyover country about the latest rhetoric and proposals they’re about to pitch.

On the other hand, even when diversity of thought is useful, it’s only in limited doses. The New York Yankees don’t want players who think the Boston Red Sox should win the pennant. A Republican President doesn’t want a Democrat in his Cabinet who will undermine him at every opportunity. Our military doesn’t want soldiers hoping the other side will defeat us in a war.


All that being said, when most people talk about “diversity,” they don’t mean a diversity of ideas. They believe a Hispanic guy, a black guy, a transsexual and a woman bring something to the table just by virtue of their race or gender.

This is seldom true.

For example, it is true that a group of white economists working on tax policy could benefit from having Thomas Sowell come out of retirement to join their ranks, but that’s because he’s Thomas freakin’ Sowell, not because he’s black. An all-Hispanic baseball team would benefit from adding Mike Trout to its roster, but it’s because he can play, not because of his white perspective. An all-female start-up would be lucky to get Bill Gates on board, not because he can mansplain things to them, but because he has lots of friends with infinite amounts of money who might invest if he’s on board.

In fact, diversity is often a huge minus. The new black employee may claim you discriminated against him, even if he’s fired for legitimate reasons. The woman may sue for sexual harassment after seeing a swimsuit calendar on some random guy’s wall. The Satanist you hire may call it religious discrimination if you don’t offer him a goat to sacrifice to Lucifer on Halloween.

Diversity can work just fine, but only if there’s strong pressure on people to assimilate to the existing culture. That’s why our very diverse military functions so well. However, we don’t have those conditions in America as a whole. Instead, we have liberals promoting tribalism and grievance mongering non-stop. In other words, every racial, sexual and religious difference is used as a way to split people further apart. Many of the same people who claim diversity is a strength will also tell you white people can’t understand the concerns of black Americans, men are oppressing women and women who don’t want to share a bathroom with a transsexual man are bigots.​

diversity is "weakness" only if you're a disgusting racist uneducated trailer park white supremacist.

 

[bripat9643]

For perspective, understand that the OP believes that discriminating on the basis of race should be a right.

It is a right. In fact it is one of the most natural “rights” discussed on this forum; as it is a right that cannot be taken away from you. It can only be penalized.

I guess that makes rape and murder rights.

lol, see how these conservatives think?????

You just demonstrated, once again, that you have no conception of what a right is.

 

[bripat9643]

The snowflakes have been bleating aobut the wonders of "diversity" ever since I can remember. However, it's actually a big lie, in the Goebbels sense of the term. Here's an interesting article that explains why it's bullshit. We don't benefit from immigration. We are positively harmed by it.

Diversity is a Weakness, Not a Strength​

"Diversity is a strength” is one of those Orwellian maxims that’s just generally accepted as truth by most Americans despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Granted, if you’re talking about a DIVERSITY OF IDEAS, you can certainly come up with some situations where it’s a strength. For example, in the movie World War Z, Israel is saved (at least temporarily) by having a “tenth man” whose job is to forcefully argue for the alternative viewpoint to a situation where everyone agrees. So instead of laughing off the idea that Israel might face a zombie invasion, Israelis realized there was merit to it and was prepared in time to protect the country. Back in the real world, the NFL certainly could have used someone pointing out the potential long-term downsides of allowing players disrespect the flag when just Colin Kaepernick was doing it. Donald Trump might benefit from a diversity of opinions when he’s about to tweet about Rosie O’Donnell or Mark Cuban at 4 AM. The Democrat Party could certainly use the input of a few random white factory workers from flyover country about the latest rhetoric and proposals they’re about to pitch.

On the other hand, even when diversity of thought is useful, it’s only in limited doses. The New York Yankees don’t want players who think the Boston Red Sox should win the pennant. A Republican President doesn’t want a Democrat in his Cabinet who will undermine him at every opportunity. Our military doesn’t want soldiers hoping the other side will defeat us in a war.


All that being said, when most people talk about “diversity,” they don’t mean a diversity of ideas. They believe a Hispanic guy, a black guy, a transsexual and a woman bring something to the table just by virtue of their race or gender.

This is seldom true.

For example, it is true that a group of white economists working on tax policy could benefit from having Thomas Sowell come out of retirement to join their ranks, but that’s because he’s Thomas freakin’ Sowell, not because he’s black. An all-Hispanic baseball team would benefit from adding Mike Trout to its roster, but it’s because he can play, not because of his white perspective. An all-female start-up would be lucky to get Bill Gates on board, not because he can mansplain things to them, but because he has lots of friends with infinite amounts of money who might invest if he’s on board.

In fact, diversity is often a huge minus. The new black employee may claim you discriminated against him, even if he’s fired for legitimate reasons. The woman may sue for sexual harassment after seeing a swimsuit calendar on some random guy’s wall. The Satanist you hire may call it religious discrimination if you don’t offer him a goat to sacrifice to Lucifer on Halloween.

Diversity can work just fine, but only if there’s strong pressure on people to assimilate to the existing culture. That’s why our very diverse military functions so well. However, we don’t have those conditions in America as a whole. Instead, we have liberals promoting tribalism and grievance mongering non-stop. In other words, every racial, sexual and religious difference is used as a way to split people further apart. Many of the same people who claim diversity is a strength will also tell you white people can’t understand the concerns of black Americans, men are oppressing women and women who don’t want to share a bathroom with a transsexual man are bigots.​

diversity is "weakness" only if you're a disgusting racist uneducated trailer park white supremacist.

It's obviously a weakness, period. The NFL knee bending is obvious proof of that. In that case so-called "diversity" is causing civil strife. How does that benefit anyone?

 

[jillian]

The snowflakes have been bleating aobut the wonders of "diversity" ever since I can remember. However, it's actually a big lie, in the Goebbels sense of the term. Here's an interesting article that explains why it's bullshit. We don't benefit from immigration. We are positively harmed by it.

Diversity is a Weakness, Not a Strength​

"Diversity is a strength” is one of those Orwellian maxims that’s just generally accepted as truth by most Americans despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Granted, if you’re talking about a DIVERSITY OF IDEAS, you can certainly come up with some situations where it’s a strength. For example, in the movie World War Z, Israel is saved (at least temporarily) by having a “tenth man” whose job is to forcefully argue for the alternative viewpoint to a situation where everyone agrees. So instead of laughing off the idea that Israel might face a zombie invasion, Israelis realized there was merit to it and was prepared in time to protect the country. Back in the real world, the NFL certainly could have used someone pointing out the potential long-term downsides of allowing players disrespect the flag when just Colin Kaepernick was doing it. Donald Trump might benefit from a diversity of opinions when he’s about to tweet about Rosie O’Donnell or Mark Cuban at 4 AM. The Democrat Party could certainly use the input of a few random white factory workers from flyover country about the latest rhetoric and proposals they’re about to pitch.

On the other hand, even when diversity of thought is useful, it’s only in limited doses. The New York Yankees don’t want players who think the Boston Red Sox should win the pennant. A Republican President doesn’t want a Democrat in his Cabinet who will undermine him at every opportunity. Our military doesn’t want soldiers hoping the other side will defeat us in a war.


All that being said, when most people talk about “diversity,” they don’t mean a diversity of ideas. They believe a Hispanic guy, a black guy, a transsexual and a woman bring something to the table just by virtue of their race or gender.

This is seldom true.

For example, it is true that a group of white economists working on tax policy could benefit from having Thomas Sowell come out of retirement to join their ranks, but that’s because he’s Thomas freakin’ Sowell, not because he’s black. An all-Hispanic baseball team would benefit from adding Mike Trout to its roster, but it’s because he can play, not because of his white perspective. An all-female start-up would be lucky to get Bill Gates on board, not because he can mansplain things to them, but because he has lots of friends with infinite amounts of money who might invest if he’s on board.

In fact, diversity is often a huge minus. The new black employee may claim you discriminated against him, even if he’s fired for legitimate reasons. The woman may sue for sexual harassment after seeing a swimsuit calendar on some random guy’s wall. The Satanist you hire may call it religious discrimination if you don’t offer him a goat to sacrifice to Lucifer on Halloween.

Diversity can work just fine, but only if there’s strong pressure on people to assimilate to the existing culture. That’s why our very diverse military functions so well. However, we don’t have those conditions in America as a whole. Instead, we have liberals promoting tribalism and grievance mongering non-stop. In other words, every racial, sexual and religious difference is used as a way to split people further apart. Many of the same people who claim diversity is a strength will also tell you white people can’t understand the concerns of black Americans, men are oppressing women and women who don’t want to share a bathroom with a transsexual man are bigots.​

diversity is "weakness" only if you're a disgusting racist uneducated trailer park white supremacist.

It's obviously a weakness, period. The NFL knee bending is obvious proof of that. In that case so-called "diversity" is causing civil strife. How does that benefit anyone?

only to someone who never grew up or lived around anyone who wasn't a white supremacist.

 

[beagle9]

The snowflakes have been bleating aobut the wonders of "diversity" ever since I can remember. However, it's actually a big lie, in the Goebbels sense of the term. Here's an interesting article that explains why it's bullshit. We don't benefit from immigration. We are positively harmed by it.

Diversity is a Weakness, Not a Strength​

"Diversity is a strength” is one of those Orwellian maxims that’s just generally accepted as truth by most Americans despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Granted, if you’re talking about a DIVERSITY OF IDEAS, you can certainly come up with some situations where it’s a strength. For example, in the movie World War Z, Israel is saved (at least temporarily) by having a “tenth man” whose job is to forcefully argue for the alternative viewpoint to a situation where everyone agrees. So instead of laughing off the idea that Israel might face a zombie invasion, Israelis realized there was merit to it and was prepared in time to protect the country. Back in the real world, the NFL certainly could have used someone pointing out the potential long-term downsides of allowing players disrespect the flag when just Colin Kaepernick was doing it. Donald Trump might benefit from a diversity of opinions when he’s about to tweet about Rosie O’Donnell or Mark Cuban at 4 AM. The Democrat Party could certainly use the input of a few random white factory workers from flyover country about the latest rhetoric and proposals they’re about to pitch.

On the other hand, even when diversity of thought is useful, it’s only in limited doses. The New York Yankees don’t want players who think the Boston Red Sox should win the pennant. A Republican President doesn’t want a Democrat in his Cabinet who will undermine him at every opportunity. Our military doesn’t want soldiers hoping the other side will defeat us in a war.


All that being said, when most people talk about “diversity,” they don’t mean a diversity of ideas. They believe a Hispanic guy, a black guy, a transsexual and a woman bring something to the table just by virtue of their race or gender.

This is seldom true.

For example, it is true that a group of white economists working on tax policy could benefit from having Thomas Sowell come out of retirement to join their ranks, but that’s because he’s Thomas freakin’ Sowell, not because he’s black. An all-Hispanic baseball team would benefit from adding Mike Trout to its roster, but it’s because he can play, not because of his white perspective. An all-female start-up would be lucky to get Bill Gates on board, not because he can mansplain things to them, but because he has lots of friends with infinite amounts of money who might invest if he’s on board.

In fact, diversity is often a huge minus. The new black employee may claim you discriminated against him, even if he’s fired for legitimate reasons. The woman may sue for sexual harassment after seeing a swimsuit calendar on some random guy’s wall. The Satanist you hire may call it religious discrimination if you don’t offer him a goat to sacrifice to Lucifer on Halloween.

Diversity can work just fine, but only if there’s strong pressure on people to assimilate to the existing culture. That’s why our very diverse military functions so well. However, we don’t have those conditions in America as a whole. Instead, we have liberals promoting tribalism and grievance mongering non-stop. In other words, every racial, sexual and religious difference is used as a way to split people further apart. Many of the same people who claim diversity is a strength will also tell you white people can’t understand the concerns of black Americans, men are oppressing women and women who don’t want to share a bathroom with a transsexual man are bigots.​

diversity is "weakness" only if you're a disgusting racist uneducated trailer park white supremacist.

. Do you think that diversity has only one interpretation or trigger ?? The very word has wiggle room to do multiple operations under the title.