Discovery The Most Evil Men and Women in History-Pizarro & Biggest ever discovery of sacrificed chil

[Litwin]

Yes, you can't stand it when whites aren't deplored, it's just your heavy indoctrination; we understand.

Bull. Shit.

Admit that the Spaniards behaved no better than the "savages" they overran or you are a complete hypocrite.

"
Admit that the Spaniards behaved no better than the "savages" did they do to Indians something similar, in such massive Aztecs numbers?

We were no better, really.

Who was the last person to be hanged drawn and quartered?
David Tyrie

1782: David Tyrie, the last hanged, drawn, and quartered. On this date in 1782, a crowd contemporaries pegged at 100,000 mobbed the gruesome public execution of David Tyrie — the last man hanged, drawn, and quartered in British history.

To be hanged, drawn and quartered was from 1352 a statutory penalty in England for men convicted of high treason, although the ritual was first recorded during the reign of King Henry III(1216–1272). A convicted traitor was fastened to a hurdle, or wooden panel, and drawn by horse to the place of execution, where he was then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded, and quartered (chopped into four pieces). The traitor's remains were often displayed in prominent places across the country, such as London Bridge. For reasons of public decency, women convicted of high treason were instead burned at the stake.

So, you think England drew and quartered millions? lol

No, only for high treason. But the Aztecs didn't eat the hearts of millions of their enemies, either. C'mon. Notice where the priest is. He is at the top of the temple. It is a ritual.

do prefer to live under Castilian rule or under this one?

" Many reputable scholars today put the number between 20,000 and 250,000 per year for the whole Aztec Empire."

Feeding the gods: Hundreds of skulls reveal massive scale of human sacrifice in Aztec capital

 

[Agit8r]

Here in modern times, we just sacrifice children to the gun lobby.

 

[Manonthestreet]

You can't use today's morality to judge the conduct of pre-historic civilizations or vice versa. God only knows what the Aztecs or Mayans would have thought of the Atomic Bomb.

Everyone loves their children above all else. When a child was sacrificed, it was giving the gods the most precious thing they owned. Same as when God told Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, and Abraham said "Okay."

and than came Jesus , and has changed the old order , the same did the great Spanish war - generals

So the Aztecs should be grateful for the Spanish "intervention," right? All hail the white man or something?

They weren't evil, unless you're saying Abraham was evil. He would have sacrificed Isaac for his God, same as the Aztecs. Many of the other faiths in the Middle East were still practicing sacrifice after Abraham; they became Christians, too.

The Spanish who came in and murdered and enslaved the Aztecs and destroyed their culture, all for GOLD, are up for my nomination of evil, though.

Pretty sure Aztecs were murdering slavers on large scale too.

 

[Vastator]

Here in modern times, we just sacrifice children to the gun lobby.

Nonsense. Feminism, and so called "women's rights" have killed more children in the last ten years; than all the children killed otherwise in the last hundred.

 

[Shrimpbox]

History buffs, why quibble about who killed more, the Spanish or the natives, when smallpox practically eliminated the native population. It has been suggested that all of South America had a large in the millions, native population which was wiped out by the scourge of smallpox.

 

[Agit8r]

Here in modern times, we just sacrifice children to the gun lobby.

Nonsense. Feminism, and so called "women's rights" have killed more children in the last ten years; than all the children killed otherwise in the last hundred.

that old argument, huh.
Godwin's Law Review: The Dangers of Contraception
Godwin's Law Review: Gender Roles

 

[Vastator]

Here in modern times, we just sacrifice children to the gun lobby.

Nonsense. Feminism, and so called "women's rights" have killed more children in the last ten years; than all the children killed otherwise in the last hundred.

that old argument, huh.

Yeah. That one...

 

[Litwin]

You can't use today's morality to judge the conduct of pre-historic civilizations or vice versa. God only knows what the Aztecs or Mayans would have thought of the Atomic Bomb.

Everyone loves their children above all else. When a child was sacrificed, it was giving the gods the most precious thing they owned. Same as when God told Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, and Abraham said "Okay."

and than came Jesus , and has changed the old order , the same did the great Spanish war - generals

So the Aztecs should be grateful for the Spanish "intervention," right? All hail the white man or something?

They weren't evil, unless you're saying Abraham was evil. He would have sacrificed Isaac for his God, same as the Aztecs. Many of the other faiths in the Middle East were still practicing sacrifice after Abraham; they became Christians, too.

The Spanish who came in and murdered and enslaved the Aztecs and destroyed their culture, all for GOLD, are up for my nomination of evil, though.

Pretty sure Aztecs were murdering slavers on large scale too.

slavers , solders, anyone who they could catch

 

[Picaro]

Bull. Shit.

Admit that the Spaniards behaved no better than the "savages" they overran or you are a complete hypocrite.

"
Admit that the Spaniards behaved no better than the "savages" did they do to Indians something similar, in such massive Aztecs numbers?

We were no better, really.

Who was the last person to be hanged drawn and quartered?
David Tyrie

1782: David Tyrie, the last hanged, drawn, and quartered. On this date in 1782, a crowd contemporaries pegged at 100,000 mobbed the gruesome public execution of David Tyrie — the last man hanged, drawn, and quartered in British history.

To be hanged, drawn and quartered was from 1352 a statutory penalty in England for men convicted of high treason, although the ritual was first recorded during the reign of King Henry III(1216–1272). A convicted traitor was fastened to a hurdle, or wooden panel, and drawn by horse to the place of execution, where he was then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded, and quartered (chopped into four pieces). The traitor's remains were often displayed in prominent places across the country, such as London Bridge. For reasons of public decency, women convicted of high treason were instead burned at the stake.

So, you think England drew and quartered millions? lol

No, only for high treason. But the Aztecs didn't eat the hearts of millions of their enemies, either. C'mon. Notice where the priest is. He is at the top of the temple. It is a ritual.

do prefer to live under Castilian rule or under this one?

" Many reputable scholars today put the number between 20,000 and 250,000 per year for the whole Aztec Empire."

Feeding the gods: Hundreds of skulls reveal massive scale of human sacrifice in Aztec capital

The reason we have such brainwashed people like OldLady is due to academic corruption; lots of 1960's commies ended up in universities, colleges, and K1-K!2 teaching and administration jobs and of course a lot of barely literate 'Affirmative Action' mediocrities who didn't mind being told what to teach by faggot radicals and whitey hating racists.

Zinns of Omission


One of the big achievements of Zinn’s book was his utter discrediting of Christopher Columbus. Once regarded as a hero, Columbus is now commonly viewed as having initiated the genocidal destruction of a peaceful paradise. In her first chapter, by going carefully through Zinn’s account of the great navigator, Grabar demonstrates that it is based not on original sources but is heavily dependent on, indeed almost copied straight out of, the work of an earlier Columbus-basher, Hans Koning, who, for ideological reasons, engaged in extremely selective quotation and in wholesale misrepresentation. Ultimately, Grabar shows convincingly that Zinn, in his effort to smear the discoverer of America and to depict American Indians as noble savages, repeatedly ignores historical context, suppresses inconvenient facts, cites exceedingly dubious statistics, and so on. In short, Grabar thoroughly discredits Zinn’s discrediting of the Admiral of the Ocean Sea.

As Zinn progresses beyond Columbus to the British settlement of North America, he routinely deplores relatively minor anti-Indian actions by colonists while defending or ignoring huge, brutal massacres by Indians – whom he insists, against all evidence but in accordance with the historical revisionism of know-nothing Sixties radicals, on portraying as gentle and innocent, indeed, as proto-Communists who lived in hippie-type communes and had no concept of private ownership or gender inequality. In short, Zinn transforms violent warriors into flower children. In one instance, he accuses early Virginia settlers of wanting to “exterminate” local tribes when in fact the latter sought to wipe out the former. Of course, in the encounters between natives and settlers there were misdeeds on both sides, but Zinn reduces the entire history of colonization as a simple matter of genocidal whites constantly going to war against peace-loving Indians. Nor does Zinn just make virtual saints out of the Indians of the Caribbean and North America; he also whitewashes the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas. Though he does, surprisingly, mention the Aztecs’ “ritual killing of thousands of people as sacrifices to the gods,” he claims that these bloodthirsty savages nonetheless exhibited “a certain innocence.” Neat trick!

... and on, spawning numerous copycats whose work was never actually criticized, since it followed the PC narratives set out by the usual vermin. 'Academic objectivity' disappeared from American education, and science as well, from the 1970's on. He's also the main 'source' for all the Jap and Nazi Pity Parties both the right and left wingers are fond of here. They all parrot Zinn verbatim.


Zinn manages even to make America’s role in World War II look perfidious. Here, as Grabar says quite rightly, he “hits a new low,” drawing moral equivalence between the US and Nazi Germany, painting Japan as America’s victim, and attributing America’s participation in the war entirely to “imperialist” motives. As for the Cold War era, Zinn dismisses Americans’ fear of Soviet Communism as “hysteria” and describes Americans’ demonstrably legitimate concern about Communist influence in Washington and Hollywood as “paranoid.” He even depicts the Marshall Plan – another unique act of American virtue – as a nefarious effort to prepare “the European capitalist countries for all-out war against the USSR and the People’s Democracies of Eastern Europe.”

Anyway, on it goes. Castro’s Cuba is great; Ho Chi Minh was a hero. Then there’s Grabar’s illuminating account of Zinn’s life. Not only was he almost certainly a card-carrying member of the Communist Party; he also belonged to several CPUSA front groups. Teaching in the late 1950s at the historically black Spelman College, which was “emphatically Christian,” he sought to turn it into a “school for protest.” In 1960, he co-founded the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, one of the major radical groups of that decade; years later, he co-founded the New Party, which Grabar identifies as “the socialist party that helped Barack Obama win his Illinois Senate seat.” Other groups with which he was associated included ACORN, the Democratic Socialists of America, a “Marxist-Maoist collective” called STORM, and International ANSWER.

Such is the source of most left wing and right wing 'Truth', according to assorted racist leftists and dope addled deviants.

 

[Votto]

You can't use today's morality to judge the conduct of pre-historic civilizations or vice versa. God only knows what the Aztecs or Mayans would have thought of the Atomic Bomb.

Everyone loves their children above all else. When a child was sacrificed, it was giving the gods the most precious thing they owned. Same as when God told Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, and Abraham said "Okay."

Ever wonder about that?

Ancient religions at that time routinely sacrificed their children to the gods. And for what? For victory at war, better crops, fertility, etc. In other words, they sacrificed their children for material gain which was far more valuable to them than their whiny kids.

Conversely, Abraham only wanted one thing in the whole world, which was a son. Then God gave him one and then asked him to do the unthinkable. Abraham did not question the request primarily because it was standard procedure for the culture at large, however, it was the last thing he wanted to do. God then stopped him from doing so sending Abraham and the rest of the world that he was different than the pagan gods, and thank God for that because today most all religions are Bible based.

But this can be compared to abortion today. Most women on average kill their offspring for material gain, just like in the days of old, because children are such a financial drain and require a lot of time investment.

So Abraham being asked to sacrifice his son back then would be comparable to God asking Sarah to abort her child today.

 

[Picaro]

Here in modern times, we just sacrifice children to the gun lobby.

Yes. Trump lets us send trucks to the border detention centers and load them up with children, which we then take home and use for target practice, or sometimes we just beat them to death like baby seals.

But you know this already , from DU and Daily Kos and AOC.

 

[bripat9643]

Biggest ever discovery of sacrificed children is uncovered in Peru as 227 victims aged four to 14 who were killed 'to stop bad weather' are discovered, all facing the sea

Peru discovers 227 sacrificed children who were killed 'to appease El Nino phenomenon' | Daily Mail Online

meanwhile
"The Most Evil Men and Women in History - Pizarro"

something is very , very wrong with this hippy (commie) & Discovery program narrative, don't you think so?

------------------------------ I only watched a bit , maybe 5 minutes but the gist seemed to be to elevate the 'natives' while down grading Pizzaro and other Spaniards / Euros . Its a common theme in my opinion and wasn't taught in my schools in the 50s and 60s Litwin .

Pizzaro was a vicious ruthless piece of shit. It would be difficult to downgrade him.

 

[pismoe]

Biggest ever discovery of sacrificed children is uncovered in Peru as 227 victims aged four to 14 who were killed 'to stop bad weather' are discovered, all facing the sea

Peru discovers 227 sacrificed children who were killed 'to appease El Nino phenomenon' | Daily Mail Online

meanwhile
"The Most Evil Men and Women in History - Pizarro"

something is very , very wrong with this hippy (commie) & Discovery program narrative, don't you think so?

------------------------------ I only watched a bit , maybe 5 minutes but the gist seemed to be to elevate the 'natives' while down grading Pizzaro and other Spaniards / Euros . Its a common theme in my opinion and wasn't taught in my schools in the 50s and 60s Litwin .

Pizzaro was a vicious ruthless piece of shit. It would be difficult to downgrade him.

-------------------------------- Pizzaro was a go getter and he got things done no matter if you loved him or hated him . He and his men were always busy as an Industrious sorts and he and his invading men were way outnumbered by the natives . In fact many tribes allied with the Spanish invaders because they hated their native overlords that spent their time murdering them in Sacrifices for 'mo' rain , corn , squash and frijoles .

 

[pismoe]

and was this on the NEW and improved Propaganda show called DISCOVERY where everything is being rethought , rewritten and reported as a way to elevate the Natives over the Spanish invaders eh ??

 

[OldLady]

You can't use today's morality to judge the conduct of pre-historic civilizations or vice versa. God only knows what the Aztecs or Mayans would have thought of the Atomic Bomb.

Everyone loves their children above all else. When a child was sacrificed, it was giving the gods the most precious thing they owned. Same as when God told Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, and Abraham said "Okay."

Ever wonder about that?

Ancient religions at that time routinely sacrificed their children to the gods. And for what? For victory at war, better crops, fertility, etc. In other words, they sacrificed their children for material gain which was far more valuable to them than their whiny kids.

Conversely, Abraham only wanted one thing in the whole world, which was a son. Then God gave him one and then asked him to do the unthinkable. Abraham did not question the request primarily because it was standard procedure for the culture at large, however, it was the last thing he wanted to do. God then stopped him from doing so sending Abraham and the rest of the world that he was different than the pagan gods, and thank God for that because today most all religions are Bible based.

But this can be compared to abortion today. Most women on average kill their offspring for material gain, just like in the days of old, because children are such a financial drain and require a lot of time investment.

So Abraham being asked to sacrifice his son back then would be comparable to God asking Sarah to abort her child today.

An aborted fetus is NOTHING like an 11 year old child. Are you out of your mind?

 

[Litwin]

"
Admit that the Spaniards behaved no better than the "savages" did they do to Indians something similar, in such massive Aztecs numbers?

We were no better, really.

Who was the last person to be hanged drawn and quartered?
David Tyrie

1782: David Tyrie, the last hanged, drawn, and quartered. On this date in 1782, a crowd contemporaries pegged at 100,000 mobbed the gruesome public execution of David Tyrie — the last man hanged, drawn, and quartered in British history.

To be hanged, drawn and quartered was from 1352 a statutory penalty in England for men convicted of high treason, although the ritual was first recorded during the reign of King Henry III(1216–1272). A convicted traitor was fastened to a hurdle, or wooden panel, and drawn by horse to the place of execution, where he was then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded, and quartered (chopped into four pieces). The traitor's remains were often displayed in prominent places across the country, such as London Bridge. For reasons of public decency, women convicted of high treason were instead burned at the stake.

So, you think England drew and quartered millions? lol

No, only for high treason. But the Aztecs didn't eat the hearts of millions of their enemies, either. C'mon. Notice where the priest is. He is at the top of the temple. It is a ritual.

do prefer to live under Castilian rule or under this one?

" Many reputable scholars today put the number between 20,000 and 250,000 per year for the whole Aztec Empire."

Feeding the gods: Hundreds of skulls reveal massive scale of human sacrifice in Aztec capital

The reason we have such brainwashed people like OldLady is due to academic corruption; lots of 1960's commies ended up in universities, colleges, and K1-K!2 teaching and administration jobs and of course a lot of barely literate 'Affirmative Action' mediocrities who didn't mind being told what to teach by faggot radicals and whitey hating racists.

Zinns of Omission


One of the big achievements of Zinn’s book was his utter discrediting of Christopher Columbus. Once regarded as a hero, Columbus is now commonly viewed as having initiated the genocidal destruction of a peaceful paradise. In her first chapter, by going carefully through Zinn’s account of the great navigator, Grabar demonstrates that it is based not on original sources but is heavily dependent on, indeed almost copied straight out of, the work of an earlier Columbus-basher, Hans Koning, who, for ideological reasons, engaged in extremely selective quotation and in wholesale misrepresentation. Ultimately, Grabar shows convincingly that Zinn, in his effort to smear the discoverer of America and to depict American Indians as noble savages, repeatedly ignores historical context, suppresses inconvenient facts, cites exceedingly dubious statistics, and so on. In short, Grabar thoroughly discredits Zinn’s discrediting of the Admiral of the Ocean Sea.

As Zinn progresses beyond Columbus to the British settlement of North America, he routinely deplores relatively minor anti-Indian actions by colonists while defending or ignoring huge, brutal massacres by Indians – whom he insists, against all evidence but in accordance with the historical revisionism of know-nothing Sixties radicals, on portraying as gentle and innocent, indeed, as proto-Communists who lived in hippie-type communes and had no concept of private ownership or gender inequality. In short, Zinn transforms violent warriors into flower children. In one instance, he accuses early Virginia settlers of wanting to “exterminate” local tribes when in fact the latter sought to wipe out the former. Of course, in the encounters between natives and settlers there were misdeeds on both sides, but Zinn reduces the entire history of colonization as a simple matter of genocidal whites constantly going to war against peace-loving Indians. Nor does Zinn just make virtual saints out of the Indians of the Caribbean and North America; he also whitewashes the Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas. Though he does, surprisingly, mention the Aztecs’ “ritual killing of thousands of people as sacrifices to the gods,” he claims that these bloodthirsty savages nonetheless exhibited “a certain innocence.” Neat trick!

... and on, spawning numerous copycats whose work was never actually criticized, since it followed the PC narratives set out by the usual vermin. 'Academic objectivity' disappeared from American education, and science as well, from the 1970's on. He's also the main 'source' for all the Jap and Nazi Pity Parties both the right and left wingers are fond of here. They all parrot Zinn verbatim.


Zinn manages even to make America’s role in World War II look perfidious. Here, as Grabar says quite rightly, he “hits a new low,” drawing moral equivalence between the US and Nazi Germany, painting Japan as America’s victim, and attributing America’s participation in the war entirely to “imperialist” motives. As for the Cold War era, Zinn dismisses Americans’ fear of Soviet Communism as “hysteria” and describes Americans’ demonstrably legitimate concern about Communist influence in Washington and Hollywood as “paranoid.” He even depicts the Marshall Plan – another unique act of American virtue – as a nefarious effort to prepare “the European capitalist countries for all-out war against the USSR and the People’s Democracies of Eastern Europe.”

Anyway, on it goes. Castro’s Cuba is great; Ho Chi Minh was a hero. Then there’s Grabar’s illuminating account of Zinn’s life. Not only was he almost certainly a card-carrying member of the Communist Party; he also belonged to several CPUSA front groups. Teaching in the late 1950s at the historically black Spelman College, which was “emphatically Christian,” he sought to turn it into a “school for protest.” In 1960, he co-founded the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, one of the major radical groups of that decade; years later, he co-founded the New Party, which Grabar identifies as “the socialist party that helped Barack Obama win his Illinois Senate seat.” Other groups with which he was associated included ACORN, the Democratic Socialists of America, a “Marxist-Maoist collective” called STORM, and International ANSWER.

Such is the source of most left wing and right wing 'Truth', according to assorted racist leftists and dope addled deviants.

"as proto-Communists who lived in hippie-type communes and had no concept of private ownership or gender inequality. In short, Zinn transforms violent warriors into flower children." this is so SO true, "violent warriors into flower children" i feel sorry for Indians actually, its just pure perversion

 

[Litwin]

Biggest ever discovery of sacrificed children is uncovered in Peru as 227 victims aged four to 14 who were killed 'to stop bad weather' are discovered, all facing the sea

Peru discovers 227 sacrificed children who were killed 'to appease El Nino phenomenon' | Daily Mail Online

meanwhile
"The Most Evil Men and Women in History - Pizarro"

something is very , very wrong with this hippy (commie) & Discovery program narrative, don't you think so?

------------------------------ I only watched a bit , maybe 5 minutes but the gist seemed to be to elevate the 'natives' while down grading Pizzaro and other Spaniards / Euros . Its a common theme in my opinion and wasn't taught in my schools in the 50s and 60s Litwin .

Pizzaro was a vicious ruthless piece of shit. It would be difficult to downgrade him.

no, he was a successful general. we talk here about XVI c you know about it ?

 

[bripat9643]

Biggest ever discovery of sacrificed children is uncovered in Peru as 227 victims aged four to 14 who were killed 'to stop bad weather' are discovered, all facing the sea

Peru discovers 227 sacrificed children who were killed 'to appease El Nino phenomenon' | Daily Mail Online

meanwhile
"The Most Evil Men and Women in History - Pizarro"

something is very , very wrong with this hippy (commie) & Discovery program narrative, don't you think so?

------------------------------ I only watched a bit , maybe 5 minutes but the gist seemed to be to elevate the 'natives' while down grading Pizzaro and other Spaniards / Euros . Its a common theme in my opinion and wasn't taught in my schools in the 50s and 60s Litwin .

Pizzaro was a vicious ruthless piece of shit. It would be difficult to downgrade him.

no, he was a successful general. we talk here about XVI c you know about it ?

He was a butcher.

 

[bripat9643]

Biggest ever discovery of sacrificed children is uncovered in Peru as 227 victims aged four to 14 who were killed 'to stop bad weather' are discovered, all facing the sea

Peru discovers 227 sacrificed children who were killed 'to appease El Nino phenomenon' | Daily Mail Online

meanwhile
"The Most Evil Men and Women in History - Pizarro"

something is very , very wrong with this hippy (commie) & Discovery program narrative, don't you think so?

------------------------------ I only watched a bit , maybe 5 minutes but the gist seemed to be to elevate the 'natives' while down grading Pizzaro and other Spaniards / Euros . Its a common theme in my opinion and wasn't taught in my schools in the 50s and 60s Litwin .

Pizzaro was a vicious ruthless piece of shit. It would be difficult to downgrade him.

-------------------------------- Pizzaro was a go getter and he got things done no matter if you loved him or hated him . He and his men were always busy as an Industrious sorts and he and his invading men were way outnumbered by the natives . In fact many tribes allied with the Spanish invaders because they hated their native overlords that spent their time murdering them in Sacrifices for 'mo' rain , corn , squash and frijoles .

Hitler also "got things done."

 

[Litwin]

Biggest ever discovery of sacrificed children is uncovered in Peru as 227 victims aged four to 14 who were killed 'to stop bad weather' are discovered, all facing the sea

Peru discovers 227 sacrificed children who were killed 'to appease El Nino phenomenon' | Daily Mail Online

meanwhile
"The Most Evil Men and Women in History - Pizarro"

something is very , very wrong with this hippy (commie) & Discovery program narrative, don't you think so?

------------------------------ I only watched a bit , maybe 5 minutes but the gist seemed to be to elevate the 'natives' while down grading Pizzaro and other Spaniards / Euros . Its a common theme in my opinion and wasn't taught in my schools in the 50s and 60s Litwin .

Pizzaro was a vicious ruthless piece of shit. It would be difficult to downgrade him.

no, he was a successful general. we talk here about XVI c you know about it ?

He was a butcher.

like any other war - lord , general in XVI c including your Holland generals.

some examples

Babur - Wikiquote

https://en.wikiquote.org › wiki › Babur
Babur was the first Mughal Emperor and founder of the Mughal Empire. ..... He was particularly fond of raising higher and higher towers of Hindu heads cut off ...

The sack of Constantinople in 1453 (Part 3) – Roger Pearse

https://www.roger-pearse.com › weblog › 2015/09/18 › the-sack-of-consta...
Sep 18, 2015 - In The sack of Constantinople in 1453, I quoted a very vivid description of the sack ... When the orgy of killing had spent itself, rape took its place. .... His only son, John, a fifteen-year-old boy, was killed by the Sultan himself for ...

Fall of Constantinople - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Fall_of_Constantinople
The Fall of Constantinople was the capture of the capital city of the Byzantine Empire by an ..... :283 Most of the Greek women were raped and enslaved. ... The oldest boy, renamed to Murad, became a personal favourite of Mehmed and served ...