luchitociencia
VIP Member
- Nov 10, 2019
- 1,390
- 280
- 80
His post about the history of Einstein was the most hilarious 3rd grade term paper I have seen in a long time.
Oh, that is nothing.
If you want I can tell you about how Einstein was fired from the Manhattan project after he returned documents with formulas which weren't more than brutalities to the square. That was funny.
Right away he tried working for the Navy making projects doing conventional bombs. Again, his project was found a great fantasy and he was out returning back kicking empty cans on the streets again.
Finally got a job as a "consultant", but his "masters" (Einstein was the puppet) got smarted at this time. They moved him to Princeton. So, from Washington DC an agent was to travel to Princeton providing material to be solved and/or reviewed by him. But in reality poor Albert never did the job, The other scientists over that University, were the ones reviewing the material and told Einstein what to answer. They were careful to keep maintaining the idea that their deluded guy was a genius.
In reality Einstein was just a poor retarded man with the mind of a child. He described himself with the same words I just have described him.
When we talk about Nobel Prize, even the one he won because his photoelectric. Look, the one who reviewed and tested it, he said that yes, the results of the formulas were corroborated with the results of the tests, BUT that the procedure of the formulas was not only confused but contradictory, still the result was satisfactory.
Today, find online the "original" photoelectric documents.. Those are copies, and when you review those, they are ordered and no confusion or contradiction is found, because those are not the originals but those have been EDITED.
There were some comments in the past, of scientists who had the opportunity to check copies of the originals, and they agreed with the opinion given in 1921, that the papers of Einstein weren't a great thing.
The correlation of events indicate that after the validation of Relativity and the disapproval of it by the rest of the scientific community, here is when England pushed the giving of a Nobel Prize for him, to settled him as a strong scientists with lots of credit.
Photoelectric and Relativity were asked for the Nobel Prize and it took two years for being considered for review. The Swedish definitively rejected relativity as science, while the photoelectric was hard to win the prize because the confused procedure shown in the papers. The givers of the Nobel Prize practically were forced to choose one of them.
The members of the Academy knew about the fraud of Eddington and they also knew Eddington was behind of the giving of Nobel Prize for Einstein.
These two (Eddington and Einstein) coupled together to make relativity a success. This is also noticed at his time to talk when he received the Nobel Prize, he never mentioned a single word of photoelectric but he talked a lot solely about relativity. Of course he had the choice and right to do so. But the later words of a member of the same Academy saying that relativity was not science but poor philosophy, that ended the first part of the story of such a relativistic fantasy.
It is all written in historical records by many sources, from the letter firing Einstein out of the Manhattan Project up to his last days.
In reality, knowing about all that mess is really funny.
More funny is seeing you defending a good for nothing theory, but such is your will, so... enjoy it.
Last edited: