Did You Know There Are Muslim ‘No-Go’ Zones In The USA

[Freewill]

Now is the time to chime in that they were rabble rousing and shouldn't be there in the first place.

 

[Coyote]

The libturds claim it couldn't happen here. Time to wake up folks: It has already happened here. I have worked in Dearborn, and it's just as this article describes. When you walk into Walmart you see women with scarves over their head everywhere.

Did You Know There Are Muslim 8216 No-Go 8217 Zones In The USA Truth Uncensored

​

BULLSHIT


The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto

Should we also view with suspicion the Jewish Zones in the US?

The interesting thing about these so-called "no-go" zones is that they are not unique to Muslims. They're nothing more than areas of a city where poverty, violence and crime create zones that are essentially lawless or controlled by criminal gangs who enforce their own law. It's not new - think of Chicago's gangster era. The ethnicity of the gangs varies according to district and immigrant communities which often reside in the poorest areas are more susceptable.

So true Coyote-----there are dangerous gang infested
places in cities. -----drug gangs, used to be alcohol gangs,
"protection gangs", prostitution control gangs, and now there are muslim gangs. Muslim gangs infest some cities.

I despise thuggery

BULLSHIT


The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto

Should we also view with suspicion the Jewish Zones in the US?

The interesting thing about these so-called "no-go" zones is that they are not unique to Muslims. They're nothing more than areas of a city where poverty, violence and crime create zones that are essentially lawless or controlled by criminal gangs who enforce their own law. It's not new - think of Chicago's gangster era. The ethnicity of the gangs varies according to district and immigrant communities which often reside in the poorest areas are more susceptable.

I'm honestly not comfortable with this whole discussion on no go zones because I don't believe they exist. Not in this country. France truly does have no go zones where the police, in true French tradition, don't respond to calls because it's too dangerous.

There's nothing like that here. There's no part of ANY city were the cops will not go and the worst parts of cities are subject to increased patrols and surveillance. Though it hasn't always been true, today there is a strong ethic governing every police department to exert jurisdiction in every part of the city and not be pushed back by the criminal element. Mayors lose election when their cities are ridden with crime while others, like Giuliana in New York, are celebrated when they are tough on crime and the police feel empowered to enforce the law. So in an electoral "survival of the fittest" bad mayors who fear to enforce the law don't last.

And the same goes for police chiefs. They're selected based on their philosophy of law enforcement (and politics of course). But the point is, strong chiefs rise to the top, those who will not tolerate a police force being timid and not protecting the city's inhabitants.

So my challenge is, if somebody believes there's a real "no go zone" in America, tell me where it is, where the media has picked up on the fact that the police refuse to answer calls, patrol the streets, and enforce the law in certain sectors of a city. I put out that challenge defiantly, fully confident that no such place exists.

A fire starts with a single spark.

Dearborn No-Go Zone: Where Islam Rules and Christians Are Stoned

As Daniel Pipes has noted, the most accurate name for such places isDar al-Islam, meaning a place governed by Islamic law (sharia). In this case, the No Go Zone, perhaps America’s first, is located in the 45% Muslim city of Dearborn, Michigan. The pattern of behavior seen on this video at the Arab Festival and in Dearborn was spontaneous in one sense, but also follows a plan, one that is well-known to the intelligence and security services of the Western world.

Danel Pipes is a hate monger/

Christians weren't "stoned". There was an altercation at a large festival, involving a handful of people who reacted badly as well as rude and aggressive behavior on the side of the so-called victims.

Only Daniel Pipes and his ilk can take an incident like that out of proportion and context to try to spread his hate.

The article I provided you was not written by Daniel Pipes. He was quoted once that i saw with this remark, about France, "As Daniel Pipes has noted, the most accurate name for such places is Dar al-Islam, meaning a place governed by Islamic law (sharia)."

That does not sound all that hateful to me.

It does if they don't exist. As in the post you replied to - where in Dearbornn are these purported no-go zones?

So my challenge is, if somebody believes there's a real "no go zone" in America, tell me where it is, where the media has picked up on the fact that the police refuse to answer calls, patrol the streets, and enforce the law in certain sectors of a city. I put out that challenge defiantly, fully confident that no such place exists.

 

[Coyote]

Now is the time to chime in that they were rabble rousing and shouldn't be there in the first place.

You have a video that shows disjointed imagery from what appears to be a festival with a few people getting pissed off at rude behavior and a misleading title claiming "Christians stoned".

Do you have any credible sources, preferrably not youtube?

 

[Freewill]

Now is the time to chime in that they were rabble rousing and shouldn't be there in the first place.

You have a video that shows disjointed imagery from what appears to be a festival with a few people getting pissed off at rude behavior and a misleading title claiming "Christians stoned".

Do you have any credible sources, preferrably not youtube?

Here is where I got the link to utube for the video, Dearborn No-Go Zone Where Islam Rules and Christians Are Stoned

Here is something else I found:

CHRISTIANS WIN BIG LAWSUIT AGAINST MUSLIM THUGS IN DEARBORN, MICHIGAN!

 

[Coyote]

Now is the time to chime in that they were rabble rousing and shouldn't be there in the first place.

You have a video that shows disjointed imagery from what appears to be a festival with a few people getting pissed off at rude behavior and a misleading title claiming "Christians stoned".

Do you have any credible sources, preferrably not youtube?

Here is where I got the link to utube for the video, Dearborn No-Go Zone Where Islam Rules and Christians Are Stoned

Here is something else I found:

CHRISTIANS WIN BIG LAWSUIT AGAINST MUSLIM THUGS IN DEARBORN, MICHIGAN!

You ought to choose better sources. The lawsuit wasn't against "Muslim thugs": Federal court rules against city s Arab Fest leaflet restrictions - News - Press and Guide The incident in question was over Dearborn's 2009 law restricting of leafleting at a festival and the lawsuite was on how that restriction, and subsequent arrest for violating the restriction violated the man's free speech.

No tell me about these Dearborn "no go zones" hopefully without the aid of anti-Islamic propaganda videos.

 

[irosie91]

The libturds claim it couldn't happen here. Time to wake up folks: It has already happened here. I have worked in Dearborn, and it's just as this article describes. When you walk into Walmart you see women with scarves over their head everywhere.

Did You Know There Are Muslim 8216 No-Go 8217 Zones In The USA Truth Uncensored

​

BULLSHIT


The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto

Should we also view with suspicion the Jewish Zones in the US?

The interesting thing about these so-called "no-go" zones is that they are not unique to Muslims. They're nothing more than areas of a city where poverty, violence and crime create zones that are essentially lawless or controlled by criminal gangs who enforce their own law. It's not new - think of Chicago's gangster era. The ethnicity of the gangs varies according to district and immigrant communities which often reside in the poorest areas are more susceptable.

So true Coyote-----there are dangerous gang infested
places in cities. -----drug gangs, used to be alcohol gangs,
"protection gangs", prostitution control gangs, and now there are muslim gangs. Muslim gangs infest some cities.

I despise thuggery

BULLSHIT


The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto

Should we also view with suspicion the Jewish Zones in the US?

The interesting thing about these so-called "no-go" zones is that they are not unique to Muslims. They're nothing more than areas of a city where poverty, violence and crime create zones that are essentially lawless or controlled by criminal gangs who enforce their own law. It's not new - think of Chicago's gangster era. The ethnicity of the gangs varies according to district and immigrant communities which often reside in the poorest areas are more susceptable.

I'm honestly not comfortable with this whole discussion on no go zones because I don't believe they exist. Not in this country. France truly does have no go zones where the police, in true French tradition, don't respond to calls because it's too dangerous.

There's nothing like that here. There's no part of ANY city were the cops will not go and the worst parts of cities are subject to increased patrols and surveillance. Though it hasn't always been true, today there is a strong ethic governing every police department to exert jurisdiction in every part of the city and not be pushed back by the criminal element. Mayors lose election when their cities are ridden with crime while others, like Giuliana in New York, are celebrated when they are tough on crime and the police feel empowered to enforce the law. So in an electoral "survival of the fittest" bad mayors who fear to enforce the law don't last.

And the same goes for police chiefs. They're selected based on their philosophy of law enforcement (and politics of course). But the point is, strong chiefs rise to the top, those who will not tolerate a police force being timid and not protecting the city's inhabitants.

So my challenge is, if somebody believes there's a real "no go zone" in America, tell me where it is, where the media has picked up on the fact that the police refuse to answer calls, patrol the streets, and enforce the law in certain sectors of a city. I put out that challenge defiantly, fully confident that no such place exists.

A fire starts with a single spark.

Dearborn No-Go Zone: Where Islam Rules and Christians Are Stoned

As Daniel Pipes has noted, the most accurate name for such places isDar al-Islam, meaning a place governed by Islamic law (sharia). In this case, the No Go Zone, perhaps America’s first, is located in the 45% Muslim city of Dearborn, Michigan. The pattern of behavior seen on this video at the Arab Festival and in Dearborn was spontaneous in one sense, but also follows a plan, one that is well-known to the intelligence and security services of the Western world.

Danel Pipes is a hate monger/

Christians weren't "stoned". There was an altercation at a large festival, involving a handful of people who reacted badly as well as rude and aggressive behavior on the side of the so-called victims.

Only Daniel Pipes and his ilk can take an incident like that out of proportion and context to try to spread his hate.

The article I provided you was not written by Daniel Pipes. He was quoted once that i saw with this remark, about France, "As Daniel Pipes has noted, the most accurate name for such places is Dar al-Islam, meaning a place governed by Islamic law (sharia)."

That does not sound all that hateful to me.

I have never read anything written by daniel pipes that can be construed as "hateful" -----Coyote called me a "LIAR" for recounting the facts about the DHIMMI ORPHAN law ----from which my own mother-in-law escaped in the 1930s----the same law is now being used to enslave YAZIDI girls
in Iraq in the CALIPHATE -----they are also being enslaved
under the military laws of islam. North sudan still holds Christian slaves-----based on the same shariah shit law.
Of course ----when Daniel Pipes mentions those laws coyote calls him "hateful"

 

[irosie91]

BULLSHIT


The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto

Should we also view with suspicion the Jewish Zones in the US?

The interesting thing about these so-called "no-go" zones is that they are not unique to Muslims. They're nothing more than areas of a city where poverty, violence and crime create zones that are essentially lawless or controlled by criminal gangs who enforce their own law. It's not new - think of Chicago's gangster era. The ethnicity of the gangs varies according to district and immigrant communities which often reside in the poorest areas are more susceptable.

So true Coyote-----there are dangerous gang infested
places in cities. -----drug gangs, used to be alcohol gangs,
"protection gangs", prostitution control gangs, and now there are muslim gangs. Muslim gangs infest some cities.

I despise thuggery

The interesting thing about these so-called "no-go" zones is that they are not unique to Muslims. They're nothing more than areas of a city where poverty, violence and crime create zones that are essentially lawless or controlled by criminal gangs who enforce their own law. It's not new - think of Chicago's gangster era. The ethnicity of the gangs varies according to district and immigrant communities which often reside in the poorest areas are more susceptable.

I'm honestly not comfortable with this whole discussion on no go zones because I don't believe they exist. Not in this country. France truly does have no go zones where the police, in true French tradition, don't respond to calls because it's too dangerous.

There's nothing like that here. There's no part of ANY city were the cops will not go and the worst parts of cities are subject to increased patrols and surveillance. Though it hasn't always been true, today there is a strong ethic governing every police department to exert jurisdiction in every part of the city and not be pushed back by the criminal element. Mayors lose election when their cities are ridden with crime while others, like Giuliana in New York, are celebrated when they are tough on crime and the police feel empowered to enforce the law. So in an electoral "survival of the fittest" bad mayors who fear to enforce the law don't last.

And the same goes for police chiefs. They're selected based on their philosophy of law enforcement (and politics of course). But the point is, strong chiefs rise to the top, those who will not tolerate a police force being timid and not protecting the city's inhabitants.

So my challenge is, if somebody believes there's a real "no go zone" in America, tell me where it is, where the media has picked up on the fact that the police refuse to answer calls, patrol the streets, and enforce the law in certain sectors of a city. I put out that challenge defiantly, fully confident that no such place exists.

A fire starts with a single spark.

Dearborn No-Go Zone: Where Islam Rules and Christians Are Stoned

As Daniel Pipes has noted, the most accurate name for such places isDar al-Islam, meaning a place governed by Islamic law (sharia). In this case, the No Go Zone, perhaps America’s first, is located in the 45% Muslim city of Dearborn, Michigan. The pattern of behavior seen on this video at the Arab Festival and in Dearborn was spontaneous in one sense, but also follows a plan, one that is well-known to the intelligence and security services of the Western world.

Danel Pipes is a hate monger/

Christians weren't "stoned". There was an altercation at a large festival, involving a handful of people who reacted badly as well as rude and aggressive behavior on the side of the so-called victims.

Only Daniel Pipes and his ilk can take an incident like that out of proportion and context to try to spread his hate.

The article I provided you was not written by Daniel Pipes. He was quoted once that i saw with this remark, about France, "As Daniel Pipes has noted, the most accurate name for such places is Dar al-Islam, meaning a place governed by Islamic law (sharia)."

That does not sound all that hateful to me.

It does if they don't exist. As in the post you replied to - where in Dearbornn are these purported no-go zones?

So my challenge is, if somebody believes there's a real "no go zone" in America, tell me where it is, where the media has picked up on the fact that the police refuse to answer calls, patrol the streets, and enforce the law in certain sectors of a city. I put out that challenge defiantly, fully confident that no such place exists.

the real story------I have worked closely with cops-----
in conversation which are strictly privileged. There are
places in my city to which cops do not go----- if at all possible<<< that is it------I do not
violate privileged communication.
I did ask----"how do you stop the media
from candid reporting"--the answer was
"the press depends on us for information---
they need our cooperation and they get
it only in exchange for theirs. If a reporter
reports the presence or nature of crime that
we do not want reported-----that ends his
relationship with us."
Lots of crime details are held back to avoid
"copy cat" and for various other reasons related
to controlling crime-----BY THE COPS-----
the people on the street may know---the
people in the local hospital may know----
and from those sources the reporters
get to know too-----but it does not make
the papers. Sorry-----it is true

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The interesting thing about these so-called "no-go" zones is that they are not unique to Muslims. They're nothing more than areas of a city where poverty, violence and crime create zones that are essentially lawless or controlled by criminal gangs who enforce their own law. It's not new - think of Chicago's gangster era. The ethnicity of the gangs varies according to district and immigrant communities which often reside in the poorest areas are more susceptable.

So true Coyote-----there are dangerous gang infested
places in cities. -----drug gangs, used to be alcohol gangs,
"protection gangs", prostitution control gangs, and now there are muslim gangs. Muslim gangs infest some cities.

I despise thuggery

I'm honestly not comfortable with this whole discussion on no go zones because I don't believe they exist. Not in this country. France truly does have no go zones where the police, in true French tradition, don't respond to calls because it's too dangerous.

There's nothing like that here. There's no part of ANY city were the cops will not go and the worst parts of cities are subject to increased patrols and surveillance. Though it hasn't always been true, today there is a strong ethic governing every police department to exert jurisdiction in every part of the city and not be pushed back by the criminal element. Mayors lose election when their cities are ridden with crime while others, like Giuliana in New York, are celebrated when they are tough on crime and the police feel empowered to enforce the law. So in an electoral "survival of the fittest" bad mayors who fear to enforce the law don't last.

And the same goes for police chiefs. They're selected based on their philosophy of law enforcement (and politics of course). But the point is, strong chiefs rise to the top, those who will not tolerate a police force being timid and not protecting the city's inhabitants.

So my challenge is, if somebody believes there's a real "no go zone" in America, tell me where it is, where the media has picked up on the fact that the police refuse to answer calls, patrol the streets, and enforce the law in certain sectors of a city. I put out that challenge defiantly, fully confident that no such place exists.

A fire starts with a single spark.

Dearborn No-Go Zone: Where Islam Rules and Christians Are Stoned

As Daniel Pipes has noted, the most accurate name for such places isDar al-Islam, meaning a place governed by Islamic law (sharia). In this case, the No Go Zone, perhaps America’s first, is located in the 45% Muslim city of Dearborn, Michigan. The pattern of behavior seen on this video at the Arab Festival and in Dearborn was spontaneous in one sense, but also follows a plan, one that is well-known to the intelligence and security services of the Western world.

Danel Pipes is a hate monger/

Christians weren't "stoned". There was an altercation at a large festival, involving a handful of people who reacted badly as well as rude and aggressive behavior on the side of the so-called victims.

Only Daniel Pipes and his ilk can take an incident like that out of proportion and context to try to spread his hate.

The article I provided you was not written by Daniel Pipes. He was quoted once that i saw with this remark, about France, "As Daniel Pipes has noted, the most accurate name for such places is Dar al-Islam, meaning a place governed by Islamic law (sharia)."

That does not sound all that hateful to me.

It does if they don't exist. As in the post you replied to - where in Dearbornn are these purported no-go zones?

So my challenge is, if somebody believes there's a real "no go zone" in America, tell me where it is, where the media has picked up on the fact that the police refuse to answer calls, patrol the streets, and enforce the law in certain sectors of a city. I put out that challenge defiantly, fully confident that no such place exists.

the real story------I have worked closely with cops-----
in conversation which are strictly privileged. There are
places in my city to which cops do not go----- if at all possible<<< that is it------I do not
violate privileged communication.
I did ask----"how do you stop the media
from candid reporting"--the answer was
"the press depends on us for information---
they need our cooperation and they get
it only in exchange for theirs. If a reporter
reports the presence or nature of crime that
we do not want reported-----that ends his
relationship with us."
Lots of crime details are held back to avoid
"copy cat" and for various other reasons related
to controlling crime-----BY THE COPS-----
the people on the street may know---the
people in the local hospital may know----
and from those sources the reporters
get to know too-----but it does not make
the papers. Sorry-----it is true

Now we're just delving into the absurd. Claiming you talked to a cop saying he was nervous going into certain areas is a far cry from "no go zones". You're being asked for real proof and this is the best you can come up with?

By the way, did you notice this thread was moved from politics to conspiracy theories? There's a reason for that.

 

[irosie91]

So true Coyote-----there are dangerous gang infested
places in cities. -----drug gangs, used to be alcohol gangs,
"protection gangs", prostitution control gangs, and now there are muslim gangs. Muslim gangs infest some cities.

I despise thuggery

A fire starts with a single spark.

Dearborn No-Go Zone: Where Islam Rules and Christians Are Stoned

As Daniel Pipes has noted, the most accurate name for such places isDar al-Islam, meaning a place governed by Islamic law (sharia). In this case, the No Go Zone, perhaps America’s first, is located in the 45% Muslim city of Dearborn, Michigan. The pattern of behavior seen on this video at the Arab Festival and in Dearborn was spontaneous in one sense, but also follows a plan, one that is well-known to the intelligence and security services of the Western world.

Danel Pipes is a hate monger/

Christians weren't "stoned". There was an altercation at a large festival, involving a handful of people who reacted badly as well as rude and aggressive behavior on the side of the so-called victims.

Only Daniel Pipes and his ilk can take an incident like that out of proportion and context to try to spread his hate.

The article I provided you was not written by Daniel Pipes. He was quoted once that i saw with this remark, about France, "As Daniel Pipes has noted, the most accurate name for such places is Dar al-Islam, meaning a place governed by Islamic law (sharia)."

That does not sound all that hateful to me.

It does if they don't exist. As in the post you replied to - where in Dearbornn are these purported no-go zones?

So my challenge is, if somebody believes there's a real "no go zone" in America, tell me where it is, where the media has picked up on the fact that the police refuse to answer calls, patrol the streets, and enforce the law in certain sectors of a city. I put out that challenge defiantly, fully confident that no such place exists.

the real story------I have worked closely with cops-----
in conversation which are strictly privileged. There are
places in my city to which cops do not go----- if at all possible<<< that is it------I do not
violate privileged communication.
I did ask----"how do you stop the media
from candid reporting"--the answer was
"the press depends on us for information---
they need our cooperation and they get
it only in exchange for theirs. If a reporter
reports the presence or nature of crime that
we do not want reported-----that ends his
relationship with us."
Lots of crime details are held back to avoid
"copy cat" and for various other reasons related
to controlling crime-----BY THE COPS-----
the people on the street may know---the
people in the local hospital may know----
and from those sources the reporters
get to know too-----but it does not make
the papers. Sorry-----it is true

Now we're just delving into the absurd. Claiming you talked to a cop saying he was nervous going into certain areas is a far cry from "no go zones". You're being asked for real proof and this is the best you can come up with?

By the way, did you notice this thread was moved from politics to conspiracy theories? There's a reason for that.

fine with me------what do you call a "no-go" zone? I believe that most people understand that there are no
official designations thereof------but persons on the street
and cops know where they are. If I did not work closely
with the cops------and the results of some violent crime---
I would not know about what I call "no-go" places
in my city---------places where people like me-------should
not "GO" (fret not-----I did anyway)-----another story----
I was once rescued from the place by a kind resident thereof
who commented-----WHAT ARE YOU DOING HERE-??---
DO YOU REALIZE THAT DOZENS OF PEOPLE ALREADY
KNOW YOU ARE HERE

gee------I kinds always consider myself kinda invisible---
too unimportant for anyone to care

 

[kyzr]

Yep.

Dearborn No-Go Zone Where Islam Rules and Christians Are Stoned

This shit has to stop now. ( ! ) (<--Mohammed)

 

[The VOR]

Yep.

Dearborn No-Go Zone Where Islam Rules and Christians Are Stoned

This shit has to stop now. ( ! ) (<--Mohammed)

I nominate you to go there and stop it! Now!

What a minute! This story is total nutter bullshit.

Nevermind, you can just stay right where you are in mommy's basement typing more idiotic garbage.

 

[pillars]

I've been to Dearborn. Stayed in a hotel there for several days and ate some delicious middle eastern food. Zero problems.

Dearborn is a hellalot safer than any other part of Detroit, tbh.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

South side of Chicago comes to mind

 

[pillars]

Opalocka, FL (in Dade County)
Camden, NJ (All of it)

 

[Mr. H.]

Anywhere within 100 ft. of the ex.

 

[Skylar]

Nope. The whole 'no go zone' narrative just utterly unraveled. It started with a fox commentator who babbled about towns in England. England laughed their ass off at the ignorant fool, and he later apologized admitting he didn't know what he was talking about.

A satire website took up the schtick with dearborn, and quite a few conservatives bought it. It too turned out to be complete bullshit.

Which brings us back to a festival in 2012 where some Christians showed up to intentionally stir shit, and a few young muslims took the bait. Whoop'dy freaking doo.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Are there "no-go zones" in America?

No, there are not.

 

[Skylar]

Though an interesting topic....would be the satire websites. Take a look at 'National Report'. if you dig a bit, you'll find some obviously satirical articles. But others aren't satire. They're straight up lies. Let me give you an example:

t was announced Thursday afternoon that the New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady had been caught using several controversial substances marketed to enhance a player’s performance on and off the field.

Throughout the 2014 season, the National Football League continued to crack down on all recreational and performance enhancing substances and even updated their policies surrounding the testing of players.

According to inside sources, Brady’s recent behavior on the field is what set off the initial investigation. Brady found himself under extreme public criticism mid December 2014 after repeatedly using the F-Word on the field during a televised game. Several parents raised concern with his behavior and were very vocal regarding their dissatisfaction with Brady’s choice of language. Brady ruffled even more feathers after announcing that he will not refrain from using profanity on the field.

Brady was also the center of attention after his performance during the September 29th, 2014 Monday night match up against the Kansas City Chiefs. Brady’s performance was so poor throughout the game that he was benched for rookie player Jimmy Garoppolo. ESPN 2 commentator Dave Garmin made the following comment regarding Brady’s performance, “It was so bizarre, it was if Tom wasn’t even in his own body, he appeared extremely disoriented.”

According to NFL officials, Brady’s strings of bizarre incidents throughout the season were enough to justify an investigation per the new NFL guidelines. The results of the investigation have come to a shock to NFL fans and casual spectators alike; however those close to Brady have said they are not the least bit surprised by the results of the investigation.

- See more at: Tom Brady Caught Juicing Questionable for Saturday s Game Against Ravens National Report

That's not satire. That's just someone making shit up. There's a difference.

I think there is a market for made up bullshit to get people of a particular political persuasion riled up by meeting their expectations. Folks that hate Brady will eat this up, even thought its completely fabricated.

Just like the folks that believe in this 'muslim nogo' bullshit ate up the "Dearborn impliments Sharia' article. I don't think its accidental. When you look at an Onion article, the article always pushes credulity. They always blink by the end. But National Report and others don't. They'll give you a perfect circle of bullshit from beginning to end and make it look like news.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The Bundy ranch.

 

[AceRothstein]

South side of Chicago comes to mind

It can be quite dangerous in spots but it isn't a no go zone or close to it. Cabrini-Green and the Taylor Homes back in the 80's and early 90's were certainly no go zones. Chicago is much safer now than it was 20 years ago.