- Moderator
- #41
No you saw it. His diplomacy is war.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Booooooosh!What line was this? did Ghaddafi threaten America?
He blew up Americans decades ago and was supposed to be killed then.
Now he was killing his own people.
They cried out to America inviting them to do something about it.
Let me know when all the above were factors for any previous action of this nature in recent history.
Thanks.
You are correct Ghaddafi is a scumbag, however the US re-established diplomatic relations with Ghaddafi years ago.
Ghaddafi came to the table with the US, he gave up his WMD program, renounced terrorism, helped the US track Al Qaeda agents in his country, paid reparations to victims of the Lockerbie bombing and we dropped the sanctions on him and re-opened a US embassy in Libya. It sounds to me like Ghaddafi played ball and did what we expected of him.
Perfect.
Half the Obama-haters are complaining that he acted too slowly in Libya,
the other half complaining that he acted too quickly.
Classic ODS!!!
You never heard it under Dubya!
You say that every. single. time.LoLing @ the Far RW reactionary howl of "hypocrites!"
Fact: The people of the nation actually BEGGED America to intervene.
Fact: Khadaffi should have been killed decades ago for killing Americans, but the then Republican administration dropped the ball...as usual.
So go ahead Far RWers...bend over backwards and perform magic tricks to defend this world renowned evil dictator.
CLASSIC!
of course they did and they're the only ones who ever did that, and that's why we were compelled to help them.
the kurds didn't in iraq....oh, wait. well those people in darfur didn....um, hold on, the ones in the suda..... oh, wait..never mind
you're a bigger fuckwit than i thought, and i truly didn't think that was possible.
Perfect.
Half the Obama-haters are complaining that he acted too slowly in Libya,
the other half complaining that he acted too quickly.
Classic ODS!!!
Perfect.
Half the Obama-haters are complaining that he acted too slowly in Libya,
the other half complaining that he acted too quickly.
Classic ODS!!!
Or there's some of us who take anti-war seriously, unlike all those dems who pretended to be during the Bush years.
I'm against the warmongering in Iraq/Libya/Afghanistan, I don't let political parties influence my principles.
Perfect.
Half the Obama-haters are complaining that he acted too slowly in Libya,
the other half complaining that he acted too quickly.
Classic ODS!!!
Or there's some of us who take anti-war seriously, unlike all those dems who pretended to be during the Bush years.
I'm against the warmongering in Iraq/Libya/Afghanistan, I don't let political parties influence my principles.
I opposed the Iraq war, I opposed the escalation in Afghanistan, I opposed the attack on Libya.
Perfect.
Half the Obama-haters are complaining that he acted too slowly in Libya,
the other half complaining that he acted too quickly.
Classic ODS!!!
Or there's some of us who take anti-war seriously, unlike all those dems who pretended to be during the Bush years.
I'm against the warmongering in Iraq/Libya/Afghanistan, I don't let political parties influence my principles.
I opposed the Iraq war, I opposed the escalation in Afghanistan, I opposed the attack on Libya.
Bomb first,ask questions later. That's this President's policy on the Libyan War. They didn't even know who the Rebels were. Turns out they're loaded with Al Qaeda Terrorists. This is just another stupid Foreign Intervention. Blow Back will be coming our way on this one at some point. Very sad stuff.
Bomb first,ask questions later. That's this President's policy on the Libyan War. They didn't even know who the Rebels were. Turns out they're loaded with Al Qaeda Terrorists. This is just another stupid Foreign Intervention. Blow Back will be coming our way on this one at some point. Very sad stuff.
Perfect.
Half the Obama-haters are complaining that he acted too slowly in Libya,
the other half complaining that he acted too quickly.
Classic ODS!!!
Or there's some of us who take anti-war seriously, unlike all those dems who pretended to be during the Bush years.
I'm against the warmongering in Iraq/Libya/Afghanistan, I don't let political parties influence my principles.
Perfect.
Half the Obama-haters are complaining that he acted too slowly in Libya,
the other half complaining that he acted too quickly.
Classic ODS!!!
Or there's some of us who take anti-war seriously, unlike all those dems who pretended to be during the Bush years.
I'm against the warmongering in Iraq/Libya/Afghanistan, I don't let political parties influence my principles.
OK... whatever
Perfect.
Half the Obama-haters are complaining that he acted too slowly in Libya,
the other half complaining that he acted too quickly.
Classic ODS!!!
Or there's some of us who take anti-war seriously, unlike all those dems who pretended to be during the Bush years.
I'm against the warmongering in Iraq/Libya/Afghanistan, I don't let political parties influence my principles.
I opposed the Iraq war, I opposed the escalation in Afghanistan, I opposed the attack on Libya.
Or there's some of us who take anti-war seriously, unlike all those dems who pretended to be during the Bush years.
I'm against the warmongering in Iraq/Libya/Afghanistan, I don't let political parties influence my principles.
I opposed the Iraq war, I opposed the escalation in Afghanistan, I opposed the attack on Libya.
And now that you saw how a man who campaigned against military action, blasted Bush for his military action, and is quite obviously a man who does not see military action as a tactic .....actually USE military action as a first resort....
perhaps now you can say to yourself...
maybe, just maybe, the men and women that have access to intel and other classified information are more likely better qualiufied to determine if military action is reuqired than I am.