Dictator Lukashenko is the new Hussein

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,621
138
The dictator was appointed by Clinton in 1993, he still sits in his chair and brutally suppresses all opposition.

This is the breeding ground for the global leftist plague of Eurocentrism.

He directly supports the Wagner terrorists. These terrorists are also ultra-nationalists.

Belorussiya (Lithuania) in 1939 occupied eastern Poland. Not only did they not give autonomy to the Poles, they generally hide the fact of the criminal occupation.

The fate of the Poles is unclear. There were genocides in the 40s.

It is likely that the Wagner terrorists intend to exterminate the Belarusian Poles, just as Hussein and his Baath criminal group exterminated the Kurds.

The dictator threatens the entire world democracy.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
He openly called the leader of the terrorist group Wagner his old friend.
 
You seem a bit obsessed with this "Europe" is the plague of the world theme. Worse than Europe is China and worse than China is Washington D.C.
 
The dictator was appointed by Clinton in 1993, he still sits in his chair and brutally suppresses all opposition.

This is the breeding ground for the global leftist plague of Eurocentrism.

He directly supports the Wagner terrorists. These terrorists are also ultra-nationalists.

Belorussiya (Lithuania) in 1939 occupied eastern Poland. Not only did they not give autonomy to the Poles, they generally hide the fact of the criminal occupation.

The fate of the Poles is unclear. There were genocides in the 40s.

It is likely that the Wagner terrorists intend to exterminate the Belarusian Poles, just as Hussein and his Baath criminal group exterminated the Kurds.

The dictator threatens the entire world democracy.
Don't be a derp in the first sentence if you expect people to keep reading. Bill Clinton did not appoint Lukashenko dictator over that country or any other. My candidate for The New Hussein" is the asshole Vlad "The Dickhead" Putin, War Criminal In Chief. It's not that I would ever be a fan of Lukashenko, but the easiest villain to spot, and the squeakiest wheel, needing the most greasing, is Putin, by far. Just sayin...:cool:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
You seem a bit obsessed with this "Europe" is the plague of the world theme. Worse than Europe is China and worse than China is Washington D.C.
China is the same as Europe. The Manchus and Xins seized power there, and occupied the peoples of Tibet, Uighuristan, and so on.

America has nothing to do with it. America serves Eurocentrism only when the left and the Trumpists are in power.

But the real America is Jefferson and Reagan and America is a liberating country
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Don't be a derp in the first sentence if you expect people to keep reading. Bill Clinton did not appoint Lukashenko dictator over that country or any other. My candidate for The New Hussein" is the asshole Vlad "The Dickhead" Putin, War Criminal In Chief. It's not that I would ever be a fan of Lukashenko, but the easiest villain to spot, and the squeakiest wheel, needing the most greasing, is Putin, by far. Just sayin...:cool:
The fact that the Dictator came to power with Clinton is not an accident. Clinton also had connections with Serbian terrorists. Until Bush came, no one touched them.

Putin is not a dictator, but a victim of the dictator Lukashenko, since Lukashenko corrupted the Kremlin and seized the media space in the Russian Federation through Prigogin and his puppets.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Shortly before the terrorist act of Wagner, Putin said something like "neo-imperialists are idiots. Our strength is in diversity." This made all the Nazis very angry.
 
The fact that the Dictator came to power with Clinton is not an accident. Clinton also had connections with Serbian terrorists. Until Bush came, no one touched them.

Putin is not a dictator, but a victim of the dictator Lukashenko, since Lukashenko corrupted the Kremlin and seized the media space in the Russian Federation through Prigogin and his puppets.
Vlad a victim of Lukashenko? :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Vlad a victim of Lukashenko? :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
Yes. Putin began to pursue imperial politics after 2009, when Prigozhin began to seize power and the media space. Prior to that, he was friends with Bush and was a liberal. Especially until 2005. He considered himself a follower of Yeltsin.
 
Yes. Putin began to pursue imperial politics after 2009, when Prigozhin began to seize power and the media space. Prior to that, he was friends with Bush and was a liberal. Especially until 2005. He considered himself a follower of Yeltsin.
Ah, poor Vlad. All his power usurped by the cook. :auiqs.jpg: Yeah, right. Quiet day at the troll farm in St Petersburg is it? Bum a smoke and have another shot of that cheap vodka.:auiqs.jpg:
 
Ah, poor Vlad. All his power usurped by the cook. :auiqs.jpg: Yeah, right. Quiet day at the troll farm in St Petersburg is it? Bum a smoke and have another shot of that cheap vodka

The facts speak for it. Now there is already an open war. Prigozhin demanded the extradition of federal Defense Ministry officials loyal to Putin. His protégé Suroveikin has long been removed from his post, there is information that he was beaten. Since the coup attempt, he has not appeared on public.
 
by the cook
It's just a playful nickname. Prigogin is an oligarch with huge capital and corrupt connections in the Kremlin and especially the FSB.
In addition, he was clearly supported by Lukashenkо and Trump. He could steal from America too.
 
The facts speak for it. Now there is already an open war. Prigozhin demanded the extradition of federal Defense Ministry officials loyal to Putin. His protégé Suroveikin has long been removed from his post, there is information that he was beaten. Since the coup attempt, he has not appeared on public.
Not supplying Prigozhin, when he was the only force on the field making headway in Putin's criminal war on civilians and children was one thing, but from Prigozhins perspective, intentionally attacking his troops and mining Prigozhins troops routes of egress, was too much to put off with, without taking action, to show Putin and his military, they were fking with the wrong guy. If you are a merc, you can't let that sort of thing stand, without an answer. It's bad for business, as well as morale. Hey, you can use your military to fk some of your friends and supporters some of the time. IF a dictator in total control, you can use your military to fk some of your friends a supporters all of the time. Then again, you can fk the wrong ones, and they will come back after you and your incompetent military leads (what's left of them after their many high ranking deaths in a poorly thought out and incompetently executed illegal war) and they might just roll over any resistance killing whole air crews, officers, support personnel and keep on coming while you hide, thinking oh shit, this could be it, while crowds in the Russian town they came through cheer them.
 
Not supplying Prigozhin, when he was the only force on the field making headway in Putin's criminal war on civilians and children was one thing, but from Prigozhins perspective, intentionally attacking his troops and mining Prigozhins troops routes of egress, was too much to put off with, without taking action, to show Putin and his military, they were fking with the wrong guy. If you are a merc, you can't let that sort of thing stand, without an answer. It's bad for business, as well as morale. Hey, you can use your military to fk some of your friends and supporters some of the time. IF a dictator in total control, you can use your military to fk some of your friends a supporters all of the time. Then again, you can fk the wrong ones, and they will come back after you and your incompetent military leads (what's left of them after their many high ranking deaths in a poorly thought out and incompetently executed illegal war) and they might just roll over any resistance killing whole air crews, officers, support personnel and keep on coming while you hide, thinking oh shit, this could be it, while crowds in the Russian town they came through cheer them.
There are a lot of misinterpretations here, but in any case, I don’t see anything here that contradicts what is stated in the topic.

Yes, the feds sent terrorists to hell long before the rebellion, he was ordered to get out of Bakhmut and they tried to destroy him. This is the change in Putin's policy.
 
Ah, poor Vlad. All his power usurped by the cook. :auiqs.jpg: Yeah, right. Quiet day at the troll farm in St Petersburg is it? Bum a smoke and have another shot of that cheap vodka.:auiqs.jpg:
Oh, as long as the Russian troll farm has been mentioned.. Is you as a moderator able to see the location where a poster is?
 
when he was the only force on the field making headway
By the way, this is a pure lie of the Prigogin media. They fought badly, they stood in one place for a year. Their professionalism is rubbish. These are some kind of soft-bodied pigs and alcoholics, they barely move their asses, and they did not have any complex operations. Primitive assault actions are the lot of the cheapest soldiers

In addition, there was artillery. They just load and fire cannons. Peasant war of cannon fodder.
They were professionals not in the war with the Ukrainians, but in the war with old women and children.
 
Oh, as long as the Russian troll farm has been mentioned.. Is you as a moderator able to see the location where a poster is?
He can't see, I'm behind a proxy.
This site is blocked in RF
 
And I never said anything from what they write in the instructions of Prigozhin's trolls.
As far as I know, the troll factory no longer exists. These assets were taken from the terrorists.
 
There are a lot of misinterpretations here, but in any case, I don’t see anything here that contradicts what is stated in the topic.

Yes, the feds sent terrorists to hell long before the rebellion, he was ordered to get out of Bakhmut and they tried to destroy him. This is the change in Putin's policy.
Probably not a change in Putin's long term best interests or his illegal war of aggression, and in the short term, terminally stupid for some of Putin's forces, though he is not known for caring for the good his forces. Not a guy generating or deserving the loyalty of his troops.
 

Forum List

Back
Top